PPT-Computational Hermeneutics: Using Computers for the Logical Analysis of (Philosophical)

Using Computers for the Logical Analysis of Philosophical NL Arguments CLAR 2018 2 nd Chinese Conference on Logic and Argumentation David Fuenmayor Free Universit y Berlin davidfuenmayor. Beyond . the . Basics. Module 5. Strengthening Ethical Arguments. Learning Objectives. Develop clear and understandable ethical arguments by deconstructing their rationale.. Make ethical arguments more compelling by adding supporting information to ensure the rationale is normative, logical, and credible.. http://. uoregon.edu/~moursund/dave/index.htm. “Computational . thinking is a fundamental skill for everybody, not just for computer scientists. To reading, writing, and arithmetic, we should add computational thinking to every child’s analytical ability. Introduction and Activities. What is a logical fallacy?. A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true. Logical fallacies are often used to strengthen an argument, but if the reader detects them the argument can backfire, and damage the writer’s credibility . Jumps . Logical Operators. The different logical operators found in Java. Rational Operators. The different . rational . operators found in Java. . Jumps . A jump is also known as a branch . A jump is when you program skips certain steps to move on to another block of code . Seminal work: Language, Truth and Logic. This was published when he was 26. . He was the most outspoken proponent of Logical Positivism.. Attended Eton and was fairly precocious.. Scholarship to Christ Church, Oxford to study classics.. Presuppositions. Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics. God does not know the future and can change His mind.. And the Lord . regretted. that he had made man on the earth, and it . grieved. him to his heart. . Articulating Your Opinions. PURPOSE OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL CHAIR . To provide an opportunity for each student to express his/her opinion about a debatable. t. opic.. 2. To think critically about an issue and the arguments for/against it. . Basic Debate Workshop. Your Turn!. What comes to mind when you think of debate?. What is Debate?. A debate is a formalized argument. It provides a structure for different parties to exchange thoughts and discussion on an issue. . Thirteen Questions That Provide . A Topical. Introduction To Philosophy. Chapter 2. How Did Philosophy Develop?. By . Glenn Rogers, Ph.D.. Copyright. ©. 2013. Glenn Rogers. No Part of this material may be copied in any form . PHIL 2000. 1. st. Term 2016. Instructor. Dr. Michael Johnson. You can call me . Michael. If you must, . Dr. Johnson. About Me. From San Antonio, TX, U.S.A.. Undergraduate degree (B.A. philosophy): University of Texas- Austin (2003).. Transpersonal Research Colloquium (TRC) 2016 United Kingdom. Professor Emerita, Rosemarie Anderson, Ph.D.. Sofia University, Palo Alto, CA USA. rosemarie.anderson@sofia.edu. www.rosemarie.anderson.com. Authors: Kyu . Han . Koh et. al.. Presented . by : . Ali Anwar. ABOUT ME. B.Sc. Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan. M.Sc. Computer Engineering. , University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, . ANALYZING ARGUMENTS. Arguments can be analyzed, once recognized, by paraphrasing them or by . diagramming them. . . Paraphrasing . involves setting forth the argument in a clear and precise form. . Excercises. . SYFTET. Göteborgs universitet ska skapa en modern, lättanvänd och . effektiv webbmiljö med fokus på användarnas förväntningar.. 1. ETT UNIVERSITET – EN GEMENSAM WEBB. Innehåll som är intressant för de prioriterade målgrupperna samlas på ett ställe till exempel:.