I nternational Consensus 2015 Aliya Khan MD FRCPC FACP FACE Clinical Professor of Medicine McMaster University for the International ONJ Task Force ONJ Task Force multidisciplinary international taskforce sponsored by ID: 786060
Download The PPT/PDF document "Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) International Consensus 2015
Aliya Khan MD, FRCPC, FACP, FACE
Clinical Professor of Medicine
McMaster University
for the International ONJ Task Force
Slide2ONJ Task Force : multidisciplinary international taskforce sponsored by : American Society of Bone and Mineral Research
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Canadian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Canadian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Oral Medicine
European Calcified Tissue Society
International Bone and Mineral Society
International Society of Clinical Densitometry
International Osteoporosis Foundation
International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
International Society of Oral Oncology
Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Osteoporosis Canada
Pan Arab Osteoporosis Society
The Endocrine Society
Slide3Key questions formalized addressing diagnosis and management of ONJ in osteoporosis and oncology patient populations Authors::
Khan AA
1
, Morrison A
2
, Hanley DA
3
,
Felsenberg
D
4
, McCauley LK
5
,
O’Ryan
F
6
, Reid IR
7
, Ruggiero S
8
, Taguchi A
9
,
Tetradis
S
10
, Watts NB
11
, Brandi ML
12
, Peters E
13
, Guise T
14
,
Eastell
R
15
, Cheung AM
16
, Morin S
17
,
Masri
B
18
, Cooper C
19
, Morgan S
20
,
Obermayer-Pietsch
B
21
,
Langdahl
BL
22
, Al
Dabagh
R
23
, Davison KS
24
,
Kendler
D
25
,
Sándor
GK
26
,
Josse
, RG
28
,
Bhandari
, M
29
, El
Rabbany
, M
30
,
Pierroz
, DD
31
,
Sulimani
, R
32
, ,Saunders, DP
33
, Brown JP
34
,
Compston
0
on behalf of the International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
Slide4Systematic review 2003-2014Pubmed
and EMBASE searched = 886 citations identified
Title and abstract review – 292 not relevant to questions
594 citations full papers acquired
Remove not
english
– 34 citations removed
560 citations
Remove reviews and proceedings – 5 citations removed
555 citations
Expert reviewers’ additions – 55 citations added
610 papers for full
review
Papers reviewed , graded based on level of evidence
Slide5ONJ- agreed upon definition and diagnosis
accumulation of
dead
alveolar or palatal bone that is exposed to the oral
cavity
persisted for at least 8
weeks
absence
of
local malignancy or head &
neck irradiation ~ expected majority of lesions would have healed
Diagnosis –
Hx
and Exam- remain
most sensitive diagnostic
tools
exposed
bone in the oral cavity
>= 8 weeks
consistent diagnostic hallmark of ONJ
Slide6Osteonecrosis of the jaw: possible pathophysiological mechanisms
Suppression of bone turnover
Infection/inflammation
Inhibition of angiogenesis
Immunomodulatory
effects
Slide7Questions:1. How common is ONJ? Osteoporosis and Oncology 2 Who develops ONJ?
risk factors and co- morbidity
3. Can ONJ be prevented ?
Role of drug interruption
Slide8Incidence in osteoporosis :
ONJ 1
ST
reported with BP use 2003
Marx 2003
Data available largely case series, retrospective observational, retrospective cohort, very limited prospective data evaluating true incidence in osteoporosis patients
estimated incidence
~0.1% to
<1/100,000 person years
exposure
Ruggiero 2004, Marx 2005, Farrugia 2006,Felsenberg 2006, Pazianas 2007, Mavrokokki 2007,Lyles 2007,Cartsos 2008,Fellows 2009,Hong 2009, Grbic 2010 ,Lo 2010, Urade 2011 ,
Baillargeon
2011, Khan 2011,Vestergaard 2012,Cummings 2009, Yamazaki 2012,Malden 2012, Bone 2013,
Lapi
2013, Taylor 2013 , Ulmer 2014
Slide9Zoledronate RCT 5mg annualHORIZON PFT 7765
Zol
-case
DM with dental
abcess
; PBO
-I case prednisone
Both resolved with antibiotics and debridement
4 additional clinical trials with 5 mg
zoledronate
reviewed
HORIZON RFT 2127 pts 1.9 yrs Zol vs pboGIO 833pts 1 yr Zol 5mg vs
Ris
5 mg –no ONJ
Male 302
pts
2
yr
Zol
5mg
vs
ALN 70mg/week – no ONJ
Prevention OPS 581
pts
2
yr
Zol
vs
pbo
–no ONJ
Adverse event database searched 60
MedRA
terms- no spontaneous cases
Incidence adjudicated ONJ in 5,903 treated
zol
in 5 trials
<1 in 14,200 patient treatment
yrs
Grbic
2010 et al JADA
Slide10HORIZON PFT 7756 pts-3889 zolZol
at 6 months mean
sCTX
0.04-0.18ng/ml- low end of
premen
range
sCTX
<= 0.15
ng
/ml in 78.5% at 6 months, 47% at 24 months, 39.1% at 36 months
considered moderate or high risk based on Marx et al criteria predicting ONJ riskONJ patient on zoledronate –did not have sCTXONJ patient on pbo – sCTX not suppressed 0.27-0.37 ng/ml – would have been considered low risk based on Marx BP Rx commonly lowers
sCTX
<0.15ng/ml
Risk ONJ rare – CTX not predictor of ONJ risk
Slide11Dmab in FREEDOM -8 casesPatient
#
;
Drug
Exposure;Outcome
1--11
th
dose (5.5
yrs
)
;Healed2--11th dose (5.5 yrs);Healed3--12
th
dose (6
yrs
)
;
Healed
4
--
12
th
dose (6
yrs
)
;
Healed
5
--
3
rd
dose (1.5
yrs
)
;
Healed
6
--
4
th
dose (2
yrs
)
;
Healed
In the long-term treatment group (patients 1-4), 2 of the 4 patients have continued on
denosumab
, while 2 discontinued.
In the cross-over group (patient 5 & 6), 1 patient has continued on
denosumab
, and 1 patient discontinued
.
YEAR 7 :1 additional case long term , 1 in cross over
Slide12Dmab :post marketing safetyestimated exposure 1,960,405 patient-years or 2,427,475 patients. 47 cases adjudicated –AAOMS criteria
All patients at least >=1 other risk factors :
concurrent GC use, concurrent chemotherapy, prior BP use, invasive dental procedures, older age
1/3 resolution, 1/3 were ongoing , remainder unknown
Geller M et al ASBMR 2014FR0388
Slide13Estimated frequency of ONJ in OPS Felsenberg -2006 - -0.001%
Lo 2010 Kaiser Permanente database- 0.05-0.21%
Sedghizadeh
2009 institutional retrospective-4%
Mavrokokki
2007 Survey Australia – 0.01-0.04%
Khan 2011 Survey oral surgeons Canada – 0.001%
Ulmer 2014 Survey Sweden Oral
Surg
+dental .067%
Incidence very low in osteoporosis patients
Recognize exists and need to know how to predict and minimize risk
Slide14Incidence in oncology patients
frequency -
high
dose BP/
Dmab
for cancer related skeletal disease is ~1-15%
-
Quality- prospective ,retrospective studies , case series
Additional drugs – GC, chemotherapy,
antiangiogenic drugs, radiotherapy, poor oral hygieneMore intensive osteoclast inhibition Tosi 2005,Cafro 2005,Pozzi 2005Abu-Id 2008,Durie 2005, Wilkinson 2007, Jadu 2007,Cartsos 2008,Khan 2009, Christodoulou 2009, Dimoupoulos 2009, Vahtesevanos 2009
,Stopeck 2010, Coleman 2011,
Saad
2012, Smith 2012, Tennis 2012,
Scagliotti
2012,
Amadori
2013, Rathbone 2013 ,Barrett-Lee 2014
In cancer patients incidence- related to dose & duration of
Rx
Slide15Slide16-1st large prospective evaluation of ONJ in oncology patients -Preplanned analysis
Incidence of ONJ obtained prospectively in
5723
pts
with metastatic bone disease
Enrolled in 3 registration trials comparing
Dmab
120mg
vs
Zol 4mg monthly efficacy, safety identical design with pooling of data – solid tumour or myelomaoral exams q6 months 89 adjudicated cases of ONJ37 (1.3%) zol;52 (1.8%) Dmab p=0.13 nsMedian time of exposure 14 months both groups36 month studyLipton 2012
Slide17ONJ :Dmab vs Zol
ONJ resolution
Dmab
40.4%
Zol
29.7
%
32 patients resolution – 25 D/C blind Rx, 7 continued Rx
SRE 35.2%
vs
ONJ 1.6%
Benefit of Rx outweighed risk of ONJ by factor 17Saad 2012
Slide18Other risk factors in oncology patients: prospective evaluationMajority of patients with ONJ had associated oral event – tooth extraction (~2/3 of pts) , coinciding oral infection(~1/2) or risk factors for ONJ –
Corticosteroid use (73% with ONJ
vs
62.3% without)
Antiangiogenic
use (15.7% with ONJ
vs
8% without)
Anemia(
Hb
<10g/
dL)44.9% with ONJ v 40.9% without Diabetes (22.5% with ONJ vs 15.5% without) Saad 2012
Slide19risk factors in oncology patients
IV BPS (
dose,duration
)
Dmab
dental
extraction
chemotherapy
periodontal
diseaseOral BPGCDMDentureSmokingHyperthyroidismDialysisAntiangiogenics Age
Slide20Khan AA et al in submission
Slide21Risk factors in OPS –oral BP 2nd prevention of fracture
Italian Claims database –Nested case control
55yrs
+ with an osteoporotic fracture
Total
cohort
>
age 55 was 65,220
during
followup
61 cases ONJ identified (median 2.7 yrs)each case matched for age, sex randomly to 20 controls from
cohort-
- 1120 controls
BP users 46 (24.8-85.5
)/100,000 person
yrs
BP use OR 2.8 (CI 1.3-5.9)
vs
nonusers
longer
exposure
oral BP associated with
inc.
ONJ
risk
Lapi
2013
Slide22Osteoporosis : risk factors SuppurationDental extraction Oral BP usedenosumab
Slide23ONJ incidence with/ without invasive oral procedures and events – Watts et al FR0387Invasive oral procedures /events- implants, extraction, tooth loss, scaling, root planing
during extension of FREEDOM
At year 3 of extension- recorded OPE recorded and q6months
78% women
particpated
8 cases ONJ-7/1500 with OPE,1/2036 no OPE
ONJ incidence 0.4% in women reporting OPE
ONJ incidence 0.05% in women not reporting OPE
Exposure adjusted incidence ONJ 4.2/10,000
pt
/yrs
Slide24Antiangiogenics Case reports suggest combination of AA +BP or Dmab more likely to be associated with ONJ
Several Studies and case reports of ONJ without concomitant BP
Currently insufficient evidence to confirm a causal association with ONJ
Data suggests concurrent Rx with BP may increase risk of ONJ
Further data is needed
Bevacizumab
:
Estilo
2008,
Greuter
2008, Serra 2009, Guarneri 2010.
Hopp 2011, Katsenos 2012Sunitinib: Koch 2011, Fleissig 2012
Slide25Interruption of drug therapy-considerations Long term skeletal retention of BP
No data confirming decreased ONJ risk by with holding BP
Bone injury associated with increased uptake of BP locally-scanning
Post invasive oral surgery may be increased deposition BP locally
osteoporosis
patient at low
risk of ONJ
not necessary to interrupt Rx if required for skeletal health
Slide26Prevention :Data obtained in oncology and osteoporosis pop’n
Case series, case control, cohort (level 3-5)
Dental exam, good oral hygiene, treatment periodontal disease, antibiotic prophylaxis
perioperatively
for dental surgery in oncology
pts
Fewer cases of ONJ in preventive oral care
Kunchar
2008,
Montefusco 2008, Regev 2008, Lodi 2010, Ripamonti 2009, Bonacina 2011, Ferlito
2011,
Bantis
2011,Francini 2011,
Schubert 2012
,
Mozzati
2012,Vandone 2012,
Scoletta
2013
Slide27Prevention Strategies :Identify and Rx dental disease prior to initiation of high dose anti-
resorptive
therapy if possible Grade C ( level 3 evidence + consensus)
Optimize and emphasize oral hygiene: Grade C
Weigh risks for ONJ, risk fragility fracture, SRE
I
n high risk for ONJ including cancer patients receiving oncology doses BP or
Dmab
consideration should be given to withholding anti-
resorptive
therapy following extensive oral surgery until surgical site heals with mature mucosal
coverge–Grade D In low risk for ONJ – no need to interrupt therapy
Slide28All cancer patients need dental exam and appropriate preventive dental care prior to starting Dmab or BP Maintain good oral hygiene Grade CAvoid invasive dental procedures if possible
Need further studies to establish guidelines for prevention and effective treatment of ONJ