/
BEYOND THE APEC YEAR The Role of the Judiciary in Papua New Guinea’s Democratic Project BEYOND THE APEC YEAR The Role of the Judiciary in Papua New Guinea’s Democratic Project

BEYOND THE APEC YEAR The Role of the Judiciary in Papua New Guinea’s Democratic Project - PowerPoint Presentation

danika-pritchard
danika-pritchard . @danika-pritchard
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-30

BEYOND THE APEC YEAR The Role of the Judiciary in Papua New Guinea’s Democratic Project - PPT Presentation

PNG Update 2018 UPNG Bal Kama PhD Candidate College of Law Australian National University Sessional Lecturer Faculty of Business Government and Law University of Canberra b alkamaanueduau ID: 704207

environment courts role years courts environment years role law political institutional justice judicial petition cases court operating highly public

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "BEYOND THE APEC YEAR The Role of the Jud..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

BEYOND THE APEC YEARThe Role of the Judiciary in Papua New Guinea’s Democratic ProjectPNG Update 2018, UPNG

Bal Kama

PhD Candidate, College of Law| Australian National University

Sessional Lecturer| Faculty of Business, Government and Law| University of Canberra

b

al.kama@anu.edu.au

|

Twitter

@BalKama5 Slide2

OutlineWhat is the environment in which the courts are operating?

Key

court cases in the last five years

How has the role of the courts been defined within this environment

?

Some

reflection

on:

Election petition cases

Judicial intervention in royalty payments to landowners

ConclusionSlide3

What is the socio-political environment in which the courts are operating?Social environmentR

esource

-

rich, culturally diverse and resilient

Fragmented, highly litigious environment – frustrations, disputes and institutional inefficiencies constantly collide to produce both positive and negative outcomes for justice Political environmentVisionary and assertive leadershipPredatory political culture undermines institutions of good governanceSlide4

Some observations in the last five years:A weak parliament and an assertive executive (‘rubber stamp parliament’)Institutional weakness

(‘sleeping at the wheel’)

Highly complicated corruption allegations

levelled against public

office holdersInstitutional interferences/lack of independenceSlide5

2. Five key court cases in the last five years i

. Constitutional Crisis

2011-2012

Direct confrontation between arms of governmentii. Manus Island Detention Centre – Australia-PNGWeaknesses in parliamentBelden Namah in defence of the Constitutioniii. UBS Loan: Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, Ombudsman Commission and Public ProsecutorInstitutional lethargyiv. 30 months grace period: Ila Geno

A citizen’s response to institutional

weaknessesv. High level corruption

a

llegations & Task Force Sweep (

2014-2017)

Were they exonerated?Slide6

3. How has the role of the courts been defined within this political environment? “The courts tend to be formalistic and legalistic…

they sacrifice

the spirit for the letter of the

Constitution

… often introduced unnecessary rigidities. We cannot afford to have our courts take a narrowly legalistic approach if the law is to be justly applied. (CPC Report, 1974, Chap 8]Liberal and expansive functionInterventionist and transformative roleSlide7

Falling for ‘catchwords’?Doctrine of separation of powers, rule of law, innocent until proven guilty etc are becoming “new catchword[s] in Papua New Guinea.”

ESP

Case

2011, Deputy Chief Justice Gibbs Salika at [212]. “courts may unwittingly be protecting those with something to hide…rather than the interest of the people.” (Justice David Canings in (2008) N3526) Slide8

4. Some reflectionElection petition casesCompetency hearing – are the mandatory requirements for a petition (s 208) too rigid, at the expense of substantive allegations?Landowners (resource) royalty payments & Judicial

intervention

Is the current structure, including Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) sufficient or is there a need for a

specialised

court?Slide9

ConclusionAlotau Accord 2012:Goal: to be “the most decisive,

action-packed

, transparent and accountable Government the nation has ever seen.” p.1

‘Action-packed’ judicial

developments indeed.What will it be in the next 5 years beyond the APEC?