Econospheres Brussels November 2015 rjanssenetucorg RECALLING THE BACKGROUND THE EURO AREAS EXPERIMENT WITH INTERNAL DEVALUATION IF WE CANT DEVALUE THE CURRENCY ANYMORE WE HAVE TO DEVALUE WAGES ID: 574271
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CREATING JOBS BY INCREASING WAGES ?" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
CREATING JOBS BY INCREASING WAGES ?
Econospheres
, Brussels
November
2015
rjanssen@etuc.org
Slide2
RECALLING THE BACKGROUND
THE EURO AREA’S EXPERIMENT WITH INTERNAL DEVALUATION
« IF WE CAN’T DEVALUE THE CURRENCY ANYMORE, WE HAVE TO DEVALUE WAGES »Slide3
THE ROLE OF EUROPEAN ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE
BASICALLY A TRANSFER OF NATIONAL COMPETENCE ON WAGES (AND LABOUR MARKET POLICY) TO THE EUROPEAN LEVEL
ITS AIM IS TO ALLOW THE EUROPEAN LEVEL TO IMPOSE REFORMS ON MEMBER STATES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE VERY DIFFICULT….
…. BUT REFORMS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO SAVE THE SINGLE CURRENCY:
WAGES THAT ARE FLEXIBLE DOWNWARDS
MANY DIFFERENT WAYS
Troika
bail
outs
Commission
issuing
each
year
country
specific
recommendations
Macro
conditionalities
in
European
structural
funds
Since
2011, a new
policy
process
(« Excessive Macro
Imbalances
’)
giving
the Commission the
possibility
to
intervene
in national
economic
policy
making
(
including
wages
)Slide4
THEIR LATEST INVENTION: NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS BOARDS
Commission
wants
European
Council to
agree
to a Council
Recommendation
that
requests
all euro area
member
states to set up a National
Competitiveness
Board
(Non euro
members
can
join
this
if
they
want
)
Independent experts, not to
be
influenced
by ‘
stakeholders
’ (social
partners
should
be
consulted
as a relevant
stakeholder
)Slide5
WHAT EXACTLY WILL THESE COMPETITIVENESS BOARDS BE DOING?
M
onitor
competitiveness developments relative to global
competitors. This includes wage dynamics (short term).
I
nform
the wage setting process by providing relevant information.
Monitor
policies and formulate policy advise in the field of competitiveness.
P
rovide
advice on the implementation of the Country Specific RecommendationsSlide6
THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL
There
is
language
on
taking
national
wage
formation
systems
into
account
and not
affecting
the right to
negotiate
collectively
and to
take
collective action (but
this
is
only
written
in the
recitals
)
However
, ‘mission
creep
’
is
already
in the pipeline:
Boards
need
to
be
statutory
: Points to a
legalistic
approach
to
wage
competitivenesstional
law
.
Future
progress report
to
see ”whether the adoption of binding provisions appears
necessary” is already being announced (after 6 months)
Accompanying Commission Communication: “if
necessary in stage 2 (…) common principles by means of a binding instrument will be presented
”. Stage 2 = Mid 2017Slide7
THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSAL
Basically
, stage
is
being
set for a
general
(euro area
wide
)
trespassing
into
the
domain
of
wage
bargaining
…
… and
this
under
the banner of ‘
competitiveness
’
Inspired
by the
Belgian
law
on
competitiveness
and
wages
Experience
of
Belgian
trade
unions:
Works
systematically
to
the
advantage
of
employers
,
A
llows
government
to
intervene
in
wages
,
even
when
this
goes
against
collective
agreements
already
concluded
Organizes
the ‘race to the
bottom
’: The
lower
wage
dynamics
in Germany/France, the more the
legal
wage
margins
in
Belgium
get
compressedSlide8
THE ETUC RESOLUTION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OCTOBER 2015
Basic position:
The ETUC
rejects
these
National
Competitiveness
Boards
.
«
We
do not
accept
any
institution (or the basis of
such
institution)
that
interfere
with
the
autonomy
of the social
partners
» Slide9
COMPETITIVE WAGE DUMPING: DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE ?
NOT ALL OF US CAN BECOME MORE COMPETITIVE AGAINST THE REST OF US
IF ALL OR A SERIES OF EURO AREA COUNTRIES SQUEEZE WAGES, NO ONE IMPROVES ITS COMPETITIVE POSITION….
…. BUT IF ALL OF US SQUEEZE WAGES WE UNDERMINE OUR OWN DOMESTIC DEMAND DYNAMICS…
….AS WELL AS EACH OTHERS’ EXPORT MARKETS Slide10
RECENT IMF STUDY SEEMS TO CONFIRM THIS
IMF STAFF DISCUSSION NOTE: WAGE MODERATION IN CRISIS 15/22
SIMULATES SCENARIO WHEREBY 5 CRISIS COUNTRIES (GREECE,ITALY,SPAIN,IRELAND,PORTUGAL) JOINTLY PUSH NOMINAL WAGES DOWN BY 2% OVER TWO YEARS
IMF ALSO ASSUMES NOMINAL INTEREST RATES ARE ALREADY AT THE ZERO BOUND, SO ECB CAN NOT CUT INTEREST RATES AS IT IS DIFFICULT TO HAVE INTEREST RATES BELOW ZEROSlide11
THE RESULTS FOR THE ENTIRE EURO AREASlide12
ANOTHER SIMULATION: ALL, NOT JUST FIVE COUNTRIES, SQUEEZE WAGES BY 2% Slide13
THE MECHANISM BEHIND
2% WAGE MODERATION IN ALL EURO AREA COUNTRIES (HENCE NO CHANGES IN INTRA EURO AREA COMPETITIVE POSITIONS)
PULLS INFLATION DOWN BY 2%
NOMINAL INTEREST RATES ARE STUCK AT THE ZERO LEVEL
SO REAL INTEREST RATES INCREASE
AND STIFLE CONSUMPTION AND INVESTMENT EXPENDITURE
END RESULT : WAGE MODERATION KILLS JOBS Slide14
THE INVERSE MECHANISM
WHAT IF ALL EURO AREA MEMBER STATES RAISE WAGES BY 2% ?
NO ONE LOSES COMPETITIVENESS TO ANOTHER EURO AREA COUNTRY
INFLATION GOES UP AND GOES BACK FROM ZERO NOW TO 2%
WHICH IS WHAT THE ECB LIKES TO SEE AS IT DEFINES A PRICE STABIITY TARGET OF 2%
SO THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE ECB TO RAISE INTEREST RATES
HIGHER INFLATION WITH NOMINAL INTEREST RATES STAYING PUT IMPLY LOWER REAL INTEREST RATES
CONSUMPTION AND INVESTMENT TAKE OFF: WE HAVE A RECOVERY! Slide15
PICTURE YOURSELF THIS GRAPH INVERTEDSlide16
OTHER RESEARCH CONFIRMS THIS
OZLEM ONARAM/THOMAS OBST: WAGE LED GROWTH IN EU 15 MEMBER STATES – FEPS 2015 PAPER
STARTS FROM OBSERVATION THAT WAGE SHARES HAVE BEEN FALLING ALL OVER EUROPE
SIMULATES WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WAGE SHARES ARE
SIMULTANEOUSLY
INCREASED BACK TO THEIR PEAK LEVELS IN THE EU 15Slide17
A SIMULTANEOUS WAGE LED RECOVERY FOR EU 15Slide18
MECHANISM BEHIND THESE RESULTS
TENDENCY TO CONSUME OUT OF WAGE INCOME IS HIGHER THAN TENDENCY OF CAPITAL OWNERS TO CONSUME OUT OF PROFITS
REDISTRIBUTION FROM PROFITS TO WAGES BOOSTS CONSUMPTION DEMAND
IMPROVED DEMAND PERSPECTIVES IMPLY HIGHER INVESTMENT , EVEN IF PROFIT SHARE IS LOWER
ON TOP OF THAT: INCREASE IN DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION IN ONE MEMBER STATE PROVIDES EXPORT MARKET FOR OTHERS AND VICE VERSA: INVESTMENT EVERYWHERE GETS AN EXTRA UPWARD PUSH
Slide19
CONCLUSION
OUR DEMAND FOR AN INCREASE IN PAY FOR ALL WORKERS ACROSS EUROPE MAKES MUCH SENSE IN THIS CONTEXT OF LOW INFLATION
PROBLEM HOWEVER: HOW
TO CONVINCE POLICY MAKERS ?