PPT-Reasoning Is A Good Thing!

Isaiah 118 Come now and let us reason together Says the LORD Though your sins are like scarlet They shall be as white as snow Though they are red like crimson They shall be as wool. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Bayesian Reasoning. P(. A . &. B. ) . = . P(. A. |. B. ) * P(. B. ). Product Rule:. Shorthand for . . P(A=true & B=true) = P(A=true | B=true) * P(B=true). Sources: D. Jensen. “Research Methods for Empirical Computer Science.”. . William M.K. . Trochim. . “Research Methods Knowledgebase”. More on Causality. What is causality?. What’s Important About Causality?. Patricia A. Alexander. Forward a claim about the association between relational reasoning with metacognition theory and research. Consider the nature of percepts and concepts in human learning and performance. Deductive reasoning. , also . deductive logic. or . logical deduction. or, informally, . ". top-down. " logic. , is the process of . reasoning. from one or more . statements. (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. It differs from . Argument. Monty Python – Argument Clinic video. Monty Python. Premises + Conclusion = Argument. Argument – a group of statements including one or more premises and a conclusion. Premise – a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. Rebecca Wulf. Ivy Tech Lafayette. rwulf@ivytech.edu. . Ben Markham. Ivy Tech Bloomington. bmarkham@ivytech.edu. . Sharon Koch. Ivy Tech Gary. s. koch12@ivytech.edu. . Ivy Tech Community College. 30 . The other side of logic. Deduction . vs. Induction. Deduction – General to Specific. Induction – Specific to General. Inductive reasoning. Uses particular facts, common threads and ideas to draw a conclusion suggested by evidence. Humans use their common sense all the time. what is it?. can we instill it in our AI programs?. if not, what are the consequences for AI?. We might think of common sense reasoning as the knowledge accumulated through experience that gives us the ability to. After Four years of CER . in the . Classroom. Laura Rossier. F. A. Day Middle School. 8. th. grade Earth & Space Science. laura_rossier@newton.k12.ma.us. What’s your CER experience?. How many have never heard of CER?. Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Task Force. Final Report. 15 September . 2016. Guiding Principle: . Educational Policy must balance access and opportunity to achieve equity.. Recommendation I. Define quantitative reasoning. Recommendation I. Mike Cooper. 29/01/16. Starter activity. Which number does not belong?. 15. 23. 20. 25. (Harder?) Starter activity. If 0.3 x 0.5 = 0.15. is 0.3 x 0.2 = 0.6. ?. Why reason?. When is reasoning needed?. Qualitative Preferences: Tools and Applications. Ganesh Ram Santhanam. 1. , . Samik. Basu. 1. & . Vasant. Honavar. 2. 1. Iowa . State . University, . 2 . Penn State University. gsanthan@iastate.edu. - Charles Sanders Peirce. On the Radar. Researching the Persuasive Speech Assignment. Due Wednesday on . WebCT. (by 11:59 p.m.). Exam Two. This Friday in Lecture. Study Guide on Course Website. Workshops for the Persuasive Speech.