HI136 History of Germany Lecture 8 Gustav Stresemann 18781929 From a lowerclass Berlin family Studied economics and was a successful businessman before entering politics in 1907 The youngest Deputy in the Reichstag when first elected ID: 183101
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Revisionism and the Search for Stability" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Revisionism and the Search for Stability
HI136, History of Germany
Lecture 8Slide2
Gustav Stresemann (1878-1929)
From a lower-class Berlin family.
Studied economics and was a successful businessman before entering politics in 1907.
The youngest Deputy in the Reichstag when first elected.
1917: Became parliamentary leader of the National Liberal Party.
1918: Founder member of the DVP.
1923: Served as Chancellor at the height of the Inflation Crisis.
1923-29: Served as Reich Foreign Minister in successive coalitions.
1926: Received the Nobel Peace Prize.
‘Weimar’s greatest statesman’?Slide3
Source: Mark
Mazower
,
The Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century
(1998)Slide4
The Treaty of Versailles
The
German Army to be reduced to 100,000 men by March 1920 and the German General Staff abolished (Article 160).
Germany forced to accept full responsibility for the war (Article 231).Germany to compensate the Allies for all damage and financial losses incurred during the war by paying an indeterminate sum in reparations. A Commission is established to decide on the final amount by May 1921 (Article 232).
France given control of the coalmines in the Saar basin (Article 45
).
Germany to cede West Prussia and Posen to the new Polish republic (Article 87).
Germany also loses Alsace and Lorraine to France,
Eupen
and
Melmedy
to Belgium, Northern Schleswig to Denmark, Upper Silesia to Poland and Memel to Lithuania.
Germany forced to cede her colonies to the Allies (Article 119).
To ensure that Germany abides by the terms of the Treaty, the territory west of the Rhine and the bridgeheads at Cologne, Mainz and Koblenz are to be occupied by Allied troops for up to 15 years (Article 428)Slide5
The Treaty of Versailles
Source: G. Layton,
From Bismarck to Hitler
1890-1933 (1993)Slide6
The War Guilt Clause
(Article 231)
“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”Slide7
The Occupation of the Rhineland
The Rhineland to be occupied for 15 years as a guarantee of reparations payments and French security.
The area divided into 4 zones, each occupied by a different allied army.
From June 1919 the occupation was presided over by a civilian body, the Inter-Allied Rhineland High Commission (IARHC).
The relationship between occupiers and occupied varied in the different zones, but generally the Germans resented the presence of foreign troops on their soil.
Soucre
: R.
Overy
,
The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Third Reich
(1996)Slide8
Reparations
The Allies needed reparations to cover the costs of the war.
Disagreement over how much Germany should pay and what percentage should be given to each of the Allies.
It was agreed that a Reparations Commission should be established to decide on a final figure by May 1921 – in the meantime Germany was required to pay a lump sum of 20 billion gold marks and raise a further 60 billion through the sale of bonds.Jan. 1921: the Allies present Germany with a bill for 226,000 billion marks to be paid over 42 years. The Germans suggest the alternative figure of 30 billion marks.
April 1921: The Reparations Commission sets the total amount to be paid at
152,000
billion marks and Germany is given a month to agree to this figure.Slide9
Revisionism
Opposition to the Treaty of Versailles was about the only issue on which most Germans could agree during the Weimar period.
But division over how to overturn the Treaty:
‘Hardliners’ – any concession to the Allies should be avoided: reparations should not be paid, disarmament flouted and the territorial clauses overturned.‘Moderates’ – recognised that Germany’s domestic instability and diplomatic isolation hampered freedom of movement in foreign policy. The only way to achieve revision of the treaty was through negotiation.
Erf
üllungspolitik
(‘Fulfillment Policy’): an attempt to fulfill as many of the clauses of the Treaty as possible, in the hope that this display of goodwill would encourage the Allies to grant concessions. Slide10
The Rapallo Treaty (1922)
Treaty signed between Germany and the Soviet Union in April 1922.
Re-established full diplomatic relations between Germany and Russia – Germany the first nation in the world to formally recognize the USSR.
Both countries renounced claims to war debts and reparations, and agreed to co-operate over economic matters.Secret clauses of the Treaty allowed Germany to circumvent the military clauses of the Treaty of Versailles by training troops and developing forbidden weapons (tanks, an airforce
etc.) on Russian soil.
Foreign Minister Walther
Rathenau
(1867-1922)Slide11
The Ruhr Crisis, 1923-24
On
11 January 1923 French and Belgian troops entered the Ruhr.
Germany responded by pursuing a policy of ‘passive resistance’, but this placed strain on the already weak German economy and led to hyperinflation.Stresemann was appointed Chancellor on 13 August 1923, a state of emergency was proclaimed and passive resistance called off.
But the occupation had weakened the French economy as well and in January 1924 they were forced to agree to the establishment of a commission to investigate the problem of reparations.
The Dawes Plan (1924)
did not alter the total sum to be repaid, but drew up a more realistic repayment plan and provided a large American loan to help finance German economic recovery.Slide12
The Locarno Treaties (1925)
After signing the Locarno Treaties, London, 16 Nov. 1925. French Premier Aristide Briand is in the centre, Gustav
Streseman
stands behind him. British Foreign Secretary Austin
Chamberliain
is on the left. Slide13
“Locarno…is the achievement of lasting peace on the Rhine, guaranteed by the formal renunciation of force by the two great neighbouring nations and also by the commitment of other states to come to the aid of the victim of an act of aggression in violation of this treaty…It can and it ought to be the basis for a general cooperative effort among these nations to spread peace wherever their material power and moral influence reach.”
Gustav Stresemann, 1926Slide14
Rehabilitation
1926: Germany allowed to join the League of Nations.
1926: Treaty of Berlin with USSR reaffirms the agreements made at Rapallo in 1922.
1928: Germany signs the
Kellog
-Briand Pact, thereby renouncing the use of force and committing herself to disarmament.
1929: The Young Plan – a revised scheme for repaying Reparations. The allies agree to evacuate the Rhineland early.Slide15
Foreign Policy After Stresemann
1930: Withdrawal of Allied troops from the Rhineland.
Change of gear after Stresemann: more assertive foreign policy under
Curtius and Brüning.1931: Proposed customs union with Austria.June 1932: One year moratorium on reparations.
July 1932: Withdrawal from International Disarmament Commission.
1932:
Lusanne
Agreement – ends reparations.Slide16
Stresemann – a good European?
Yes
Conciliatory cooperative policy towards France and Britain.
Germany joins League of Nations.International recognition Nobel Peace Prize (together with Aristide Briand).
No
Economic pressure on Poland.
Germany as advocate of rights of German minorities in Eastern Europe.
Letter to Crown Prince: readjustment of Eastern borders and liberation of Germany from foreign domination.
Illegal military cooperation with Soviet Russia.Slide17
Was Stresemann successful?
Foreign Policy
Reparation
payments now clear.American investment.
Beginning of reconciliation with France and integration into European policies.
Early withdrawal of French troops from Ruhr and later from Rhineland.
No territorial revisions in the East.
Effects on domestic policy
German
public opinion violently against amount and length of payments.
German financial system dependent on American money.
Public opinion:
Germany gained too little by renouncing claim to Alsace-Lorraine.
Disappointment
.
Without doubt constructive and successful foreign policy in longer term perspective, in short-term perspective was not supported by German public opinion – was not able to give additional legitimacy to Weimar democracy.Slide18
Book Review
Due: Monday in Lecture,
Week 1, Term 2
You may choose any book that is at least 200 pages and has been published since the year 2000. The purpose of a book review is to provide a summary of the work, evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, and, most importantly, present your overall assessment of the work. Towards this assessment, you should discuss one or more of the following: the book’s audience, its usefulness (for scholars, students, the general public), and its contribution to the field.
Slide19
Sample Book Review
Available on
Jstor
:Hannah Schissler, “Review: Rebuilding West German Society: A Gendered View”, Reviewed work: Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany by Robert G. Moeller Central European History
, Vol. 26, No. 3 (1993), pp. 326-334
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4546350
Linda Gordon, “Review: Nazi Feminists?”, Reviewed work:
Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics
by Claudia
Koonz
Feminist Review
, No. 27 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 97-105
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394813?&Search=yes&term=feminists&term=gordon&term=linda&term=nazi&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq0%3Dlinda%2Bgordon%2Bnazi%2Bfeminists%26f0%3Dall%26c1%3DAND%26q1%3D%26f1%3Dall%26acc%3Don%26wc%3Don%26Search%3DSearch%26sd%3D%26ed%3D%26la%3D%26jo%3D&item=2&ttl=321&returnArticleService=showFullText
Robert
Gellately
, “Review: [untitled]”, Reviewed work:
Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust
by Daniel Jonah
Goldhagen
The Journal of Modern History
, Vol. 69, No. 1 (Mar., 1997), pp. 187-191
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2953473?&Search=yes&term=gellately&term=hitler%27s&term=executioners&term=willing&term=robert&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq0%3Drobert%2Bgellately%2Bhitler%2527s%2Bwilling%2Bexecutioners%26f0%3Dall%26c1%3DAND%26q1%3D%26f1%3Dall%26acc%3Don%26wc%3Don%26Search%3DSearch%26sd%3D%26ed%3D%26la%3D%26jo%3D&item=1&ttl=28&returnArticleService=showFullText