Ashok Kotwal and Arka Roy Chaudhuri Prepared for IGIDR Conference Dec 13 2012 We draw on the following Outline Motivating Question Why is the poverty decline slow compared to other Asian countries despite fast growth ID: 135839
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Why Is Poverty Declining So Slowly in In..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Why Is Poverty Declining So Slowly in India?
Ashok
Kotwal
and
Arka
Roy
Chaudhuri
Prepared for IGIDR Conference Dec 1-3, 2012.Slide2
We draw on the followingSlide3
Outline
Motivating Question: Why is the poverty decline slow (compared to other Asian countries) despite fast growth?
Possible factors driving the process of poverty decline.
Are the sectors driving growth the same as the sectors driving poverty decline?
Changing employment picture from 1983-2009.
The role of consumption demand in the process of poverty decline.
Reflections
on development policy.Slide4
Poverty Decline in IndiaSlide5
Poverty Elasticity of GrowthSlide6
Compare India to China and Indonesia
Greater poverty decline in China and Indonesia during the relevant 17 years period.
Note that China’s steepest drop in poverty is during the initial phase 1980-86 when it had not yet become a manufacturing giant; it was due to agricultural productivity growth.
Unlike India, both China and Indonesia have periods when the agricultural labor force declined significantly.Slide7Slide8Slide9Slide10
Questions to Explore?
What drove India’s fast growth?
Why was this growth accompanied by a slow trickle down?
Why is the process of labor movement out of agriculture slow in India?Slide11
Structure of Indian Economy
Most of India makes its living in the informal (unorganized) sector. In 2004-05, total employment was 457 million. Only 7% in the organized or formal sector.
If we exclude agriculture, 83% of all non-farm employment is in the informal sector.
Informal sector produces 58% of NDP.
Informal sector is characterized by low level of: technology, skills, scale.
Most of the poor work in the informal sector. Agricultural wages are inversely correlated with poverty.Slide12
Possible Sources of Poverty Decline
TFP increases in the informal sector.
Expansion (either due to an increase in TFP or due to derived demand) of the non-farm sector (formal as well as informal) that draws labor out of agriculture increasing wages of labor remaining in agriculture.
Income increases in any sector create demand increases inducing the resources to move to those sectors. Do these sectors employ unskilled labor?
Education system transforms unskilled labor into skilled labor who find employment at higher wages.Slide13
TFP Increase in the Informal Sector
Greater possibilities in agriculture: irrigation, seed improvements, diversification to dairy, poultry, horticulture etc.
More difficult in non-farm informal: unlike the formal sector, available technology is not easy to transfer. Some exceptions such as cell phones.
Skill accumulation, infrastructure, access to credit are crucial for productivity improvements but they depend on institutional improvements.Slide14
Formal Sector Growth and Poverty Decline
Fruitful to examine the following conduit: Technology transfer brings about TFP increase in the formal sector that increases demand for both skilled and unskilled labor.
We will first look at the empirical picture to understand the development process at work and then see if we can capture it in a simple model.Slide15
Growth Drivers & Employment:
1983 – 93. Slide16
Growth Drivers & Employment:
1993 – 2004. Slide17
What do we infer from the previous two slides?
The fastest growing sectors did not create employment for the unskilled. Business Services was the fastest growing sector.
The fastest growing sectors are typically export oriented sectors.
Transport (13
th
fastest growing sector), Construction and Trade (25
th
and 26
th
fastest growing sectors) were the only sectors in 1983 that created any substantial employment for the unskilled.
Similarly, Trade (12
th
) and Transport (21
st
) and Construction (22
nd
) were the creators of the unskilled labor in 1993. Slide18
Labor Movement out of Agriculture 1983-2004Slide19
Labor Movement out of Agriculture 2004-09Slide20
Changes in the labor to land ratioSlide21
Observations on Labor Movement Out of Agriculture.
From 1983 to 2004, labor to land ratio has in fact increased in all but 4 states.
From 2004 to 09, it decreased in most states but not enough to overcome the increase since 1983. In fact, it is a lot higher in 2009 than in 1983.
This suggests that if there had not been TFP growth in agriculture, the wages would have in fact declined (i.e., poverty would have increased).Slide22
Elasticity of the Inverse Labor Demand Function
2004-09 period is encouraging but how much impact did the reduction in labor to land ratio have on wages?
The maximum reduction in labor to land ratio took place in Bihar (12%).
Kanika
Mahajan’s
estimation of the elasticity of inverse labor demand function based on NSS data is -0.3.
The maximum increase in agricultural wages from 2004 to 2009, by this estimate, would be 4% out of the actual increase of 25% in average real wages.Slide23
What then is non-farm sector’s contribution?
If non-farm sector had not created additional jobs, the labor to land ratio in agriculture would have been worse and the wages would have been lower.
A counter factual would help us to gauge the relative contribution of non-farm in shoring up the wages and hence in reducing poverty.
See the next figure.Slide24Slide25Slide26
Agricultural Sector Development
Indeed, the yields have gone up between 2004 and 2009.
Partly, it may be due to an increase in irrigated land.
Yield increases have also played a significant role in the increase in agricultural wage.Slide27
Employment Share of Different Sectors
1983 to 2009Slide28Slide29Slide30Slide31Slide32Slide33
ModelSlide34
ResultsSlide35
Qualifications
Indian economy is not exactly a small open economy.
Domestic demand composition matters
Non-traded goods and services form a large part of the economy.
Is it possible that those whose incomes are growing fast have low income
elasticities
for the sort of goods and services that the poor (unskilled) can produce?Slide36
Consumption Pattern across Income GroupsSlide37
Consumption of Food grains & Other Unprocessed Foods Slide38
Expenditure on Informal and Formal Sector OutputSlide39
Income Elasticities
The income
elasticities
in the descending order of magnitude are: Formal sector output, Group#2 (dairy, horticulture, poultry etc), Informal sector output (excluding agriculture), and then Group#1 (food grains and pulses).
Group#2 shows most potential for trickle down.Slide40
Educational Premia
Q: Is there continuing excess demand for skilled workers?
For the 34-42 cohort, the educational
premia
for those with middle school education and graduates over those with no education were
Rs
. 96 and
Rs
. 224 in 1983. These
premia
had risen to
Rs
. 197 and
Rs
. 696 in 2004. (
Eswaran
et al (2009)).
We have yet to carry out this exercise for 2004 to 2009.Slide41
Defining skilled?
Of course, years of education is an imperfect indicator of the level of skills.
ASER (Annual Status of Education Report, 2010) reports that 47% of class 5 children could not read a simple Class 2 level text. Even in Class 8, 17% of children could not read a class 2 level text.Slide42
Conclusions
Too small a part of the labor force
is truly skilled
. (Educational premium increasing)
Growth spearheaded by skill intensive sectors.
Any possibility for TFP increase in the informal sector is dependent on local institutions whose transformation will take a long time.
TFP growth in dairy, horticulture, poultry etc will have a direct positive impact on the poor.