PPT-Arguing Generatively and Persuasively
Author : debby-jeon | Published Date : 2016-09-18
Charles Paine Professor University of New Mexico Richard JohnsonSheehan Professor Purdue University Welcome Arguing Today Controlling metaphor for argument Argument
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Arguing Generatively and Persuasively" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Arguing Generatively and Persuasively: Transcript
Charles Paine Professor University of New Mexico Richard JohnsonSheehan Professor Purdue University Welcome Arguing Today Controlling metaphor for argument Argument is War Consequences of this metaphor. Publishing as FT Press Upper Saddle River New Jersey 07458 Authorized adaptation from the original UK edition entitled How to Argue by Jonathan Herring published by Pearson Education Limited 57513Jonathan Herring 2011 This US adaptation is published But doesnt follow of course that there arent any good arguments Are there some At least a couple of dozen or so Swinburne good argument one that has premises that everyone knows Maybe arent any such arguments and if there are some maybe none of them The Netherlands Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool UK Abstract Stories can be powerful argumentative vehicles an d they are often used in arguments from analogy most notably as parables or allegories where the story illustrates The Kuhn-loss thesis arguing that scien-tific revolutions, alongside gains, involvelosses (e. g. those of explanatory powerand of problem-solving ability) occupiesquite an important position in theKuh 1878-1945. He was a German playwright who wrote many plays in a number of different styles. An Expressionist dramatist, he was the most frequently performed playwright of the Weimar Republic (the German Government of the time).. Sissel. The Baby Viking. By . Elinor. Roberts . and. Alana Huggins. Sissel. was sitting in the bath whilst playing with his hand carved duck. Dana was sitting on a chair watching over him. . Sissel. TO The second edition has been reorganized to be even more user friendly.been added to several chapters.Research, organizational tasks, and bibliographic work can now be completedusing online to Question: What do the following things have in common?. Answer. : All of them represent argumentation in contemporary society. . Everything’s an Argument. Unit 1, Lesson 1. TASK 1 – Arguments Are Everywhere. What’s at Stake in Teaching Argument. James Miller. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Texas State Board of Education: Who’s In, Who’s Out. President Barack Obama, 2014. “Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation for growth that will not only withstand future economic storms, but one that helps us strive and compete in the global economy. It’s time to reform our colleges so that they provide Americans a chance to learn the skills and knowledge necessary to compete for the jobs of the future.” . (when sinned against). Fear . (of death & suffering). PRIDE. Holier-than -thou. Discontentment. Negative . Thinking. W. orry. Arguing. Philippians 2:14 . niv. Do. EVERYTHING. without. COMPLAINING. Post-WWI Age of Anxiety. Americas. Europe. Africa. Asia. Middle East. United States. congress does not agrees to join League of nations. Depression hits. Latin American cash crops fall in price. Spread of socialist and communist ideas . Charles Paine, Professor, University of New Mexico. Richard Johnson-Sheehan, Professor, Purdue University. Welcome: Arguing Today. Controlling metaphor for argument: “Argument is War”. Consequences of this metaphor. flourishing. Dr. John Barry. j.barry@qub.ac.uk. Background. Imagining an economics...and life... beyond orthodox growth. “. questioning growth is deemed to be the act of lunatics, idealists and revolutionaries. Arguing About Bioethics is a fresh and exciting collection of essential readings in bioethics, offering a comprehensive introduction to and overview of the field. Influential contributions from established philosophers and bioethicists, such as Peter Singer, Thomas Nagel, Judith Jarvis Thomson and Michael Sandel, are combined with the best recent work in the subject.Organised into clear sections, readings have been chosen that engage with one another, and often take opposing views on the same question, helping students get to grips with the key areas of debate. All the core issues in bioethics are covered, alongside new controversies that are emerging in the field, including:embryo research selecting children and enhancing humans human cloning using animals for medical purposes organ donation consent and autonomy public health ethics resource allocation developing world bioethics assisted suicide. Each extract selected is clear, stimulating and free from unnecessary jargon. The editor\'s accessible and engaging section introductions make Arguing About Bioethics ideal for those studying bioethics for the first time, while more advanced readers will be challenged by the rigorous and thought-provoking arguments presented in the readings.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Arguing Generatively and Persuasively"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents