/
Chapter 2 Presidential Control Chapter 2 Presidential Control

Chapter 2 Presidential Control - PowerPoint Presentation

debby-jeon
debby-jeon . @debby-jeon
Follow
347 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-13

Chapter 2 Presidential Control - PPT Presentation

1 2 Learning Objectives The president controls agencies through appointing and removing firing agency heads The President must appoint and the Senate must confirm officers of the US There are separate standards for inferior officers ID: 688720

independent president office counsel president independent counsel office power officer officers inferior members senate control congress agencies agency executive law sec removed

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 2 Presidential Control" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chapter 2

Presidential Control

1Slide2

2

Learning Objectives

The president controls agencies through appointing and removing firing agency heads.

The President must appoint and the Senate must confirm officers of the US.

There are separate standards for inferior officers.

Terms of office create independent agencies.

The person who appoints may also remove officers, except Article III judges.Slide3

3

Executive PowerSlide4

4

Vesting and Take Care Clauses

“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1.

Article II says that the President, specifically, “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Art. II, § 3.

Together, these define the source of the president's domestic powersSlide5

5

The Unitary Executive

Do all of the executive branch powers belong to the president him/herself?

In Chadha, Congress gave the Attorney General the power to stay the deportation of an alien

Can the president tell the AG's how to rule?

Can he only fire the AG?

Why does it matter whether the president has the power or the secretary has the power?

How does the Appointments Clause fit into this analysis?

If it is the president's power, why should the Senate care who he appoints?

What if the Senate will not confirm a secretary?Slide6

6

Art II, sec. 2, cl 2 - the Appointments Clause

"[The President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint... all other [principal] Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:

but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."Slide7

Recess Appointments

Article 2, Section 2:

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session

.Why was this included?The legal questions in the recent caseCan the Senate stay in session while the members are at home?Does the vacancy have to occur during the recess?7Slide8

Who is a Principle Officer?

It is usually clear who is a principle officer, subject to confirmation by the Senate, in existing agencies.

Or if Congress, by law, designates an office as a principle officer.

Controversies arise with new agencies, such as the independent counsel in the Morrison v. Olson case.Inferior officers are hard to tell from ordinary employees and there are a lot more of them, so there is more occasion for challenges.8Slide9

Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 130 S.Ct. 3138 (2010)

Government agency that regulates accounting firms.

Members appointed by the SEC commissioners, not the President

The Court quoted a prior opinion in which it had said that ‘‘whether one is an ‘inferior’ officer depends on whether he has a superior,’’ and that ‘‘ ‘inferior officers’ are officers whose work is directed and supervised at some level by other officers appointed by the President with the Senate’s consent.’9Slide10

Who Controls their Work?

The Board’s rules and its imposition of sanctions on accounting firms are subject to approval and alteration by the SEC

.

Members of the Board are removable ‘‘at will’’ by the SEC Commissioners.Is this sufficient control to establish they the members on inferior officers, thus appointable by the SEC rather than the president?10Slide11

11

President Nixon and the Independent Counsel

Great crisis in presidential control.

The Saturday night massacre

Nixon orders the AG to fire the independent counsel who was investigating Watergate

Two people later, he orders AAG Bork to fire him, probably in a deal already set up by the AG.

Nixon's indirect firing of the independent prosecutor was the background for this law

What was Clinton's biggest political mistake?

Not vetoing the renewal of the Independent counsel law.Slide12

12

Morrison v. Olson

, 487 US 654 (1988)

What did Olson hope to do with his suit?

What triggers the appointment of an independent counsel?

Who appoints the independent counsel?

Why class of officer must this then be?

Who can remove an independent counsel for cause?

Who can remove that person, i.e., what is the chain of presidential control?Slide13

13

The Core Function Standard for Inferior Officers

Is the independent counsel an "inferior" official?

Does the independent counsel have a policy making role?

Is this a critical area for the president to control the exercise of discretion?

How does the president retain control?

Why will the independent counsel process always be political?Slide14

14

What was the key issue in Olson?

The limitation of the removal power to good cause, rather than at-will

Does this impermissibly interfere with the president's power to carry out the laws?

Majority says no, focusing on the preservation of separation of powers

Scalia saw this as a stark limitation on the president's power to exclusively control the executive branch.Slide15

15

Was Scalia Right?

What was he worried about as regards the power of the office?

He stresses the broad powers of the IC

How did this play out in Whitewater, the Clinton investigation?

What would it cost you to be investigated if you were a junior White House counsel?Slide16

16

Congressional Determinations

If the Congress establishes that the position is an inferior officer, the courts have not second-guessed it.

This might change if Congress created an inferior office that was clearly the job of a principal officer.

Be careful of circular arguments

Just because an officer is not required to be appointed under the appointment's clause, that does not prevent the court from finding that the position is covered by the Appointment's Clause.

The real problem is that the court will also not second guess Congress determining that an officer must be confirmed by the Senate.Slide17

17

Example: General Counsel to a Cabinet Agency

What is the classification of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs?

What are the duties of the General Counsel to the Secretary?

Is the general counsel an employee, inferior officer, or principle officer of the US?

Much more authority than just an employee

Does the general counsel make decisions that affect agency policy or enforcement?

What is the level and right of supervision by the Secretary?Slide18

Tenure of Office Act – 1867

If Congress is silent on removal, the officer serves at the discretion of the President

This Act limited the right of presidents to remove cabinet members without the consent of the Senate.

President Andrew Johnson removed the Secretary of WarWas impeached, but not removed by one vote.There are now no limitations on removal of Cabinet Officers

18Slide19

19

Myers v. US

, 272 US 52 (1926)

President Wilson discharged an Oregon postmaster without cause

Postmaster sued for back pay under a law passed after the Tenure in Office Act that required the senate to approve appointment and removal of postmasters

Why all this concern about a postmaster?

Chief Justice and Ex-President Taft wrote the opinion, which found the Tenure in Office Act and related acts an unconstitutional limit on presidential power.Slide20

20

Humphrey’s Executor v. US

, 295 US 602 (1935)

Less than 10 years later, Meyers is again at issue - what is the political change over that period?

Why was the FTC controversial at that time?

What was the restriction on removing FTC commissioners?

How did the lawsuit arise?

President fired Humphrey from the FTC

Humphrey died and his executor sued for the pay for the rest of his termSlide21

21

Myers

Redux

Why did the court change its view on the removal power?

How is a postmaster different from an FTC commissioner?

(This has not been important in later cases)

What type of agency does this create?

Where does the independence come from?

Are the agencies independent if the President is in office long enough to appoint all the members?Slide22

Typical Characteristics of an Independent Agency

(1) they are headed by multi-member groups, rather than a single agency head;

(2) no more than a simple majority of these members may come from one political party;

(3) the members of the group have fixed, staggered terms, so that their terms do not expire at the same time; and (4) they can only be removed from their positions for ‘‘cause”22Slide23

Stopped here

23Slide24

How Independent are Independent Agencies?

The President usually gets to pick the chair from among the existing commissioners.

Does

not control policy, but can influence what issues are addressedNot subject to OIRA (covered later)Can be subjected to other executive controls as determined by Congress.Presidential influence increases the longer a party holds the presidency.24Slide25

25

How could the president fire an FTC commissioner?

In theory the president could state a cause and fire a commissioner, but it has not happened

It has not been an issue because they get hounded out of office if there is cause

Does this mean that they always stay when the president in unhappy with them?

This is an area where the presidents have not challenged the courtSlide26

Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

, 130 S.Ct. 3138 (2010)

PCAO Board

members are inferior officers appointed by the SEC Commissioners.SEC commissioners have terms of office and can only be removed for good cause.Is there a problem with the PCAO Board members being only removed cause?What is the presidential chain of control?26Slide27

27

The Politics of the Sentencing Commission

Started out as a way to moderate unreasonable sentences

Sentences were made longer and the judges lost discretion to shorten them.

White collar criminals did more jail time

First time drug offenders did a lot more time.

Limited and eliminated various ways to shorten a sentence (no parole)

End result was the opposite of the intentionSlide28

28

Mistretta

v. United States, 488 U.S.

361

(1989

)

The

US Sentencing Commission

is an independent commission in the Judicial Branch

The members are Article III judges appointed by the President

There are no terms of office

The Court upheld the law allowing the president to remove them, even though this is not an executive branch agencySlide29

29

Removal Wrap Up

What if the statute says an officer serves until removed for good cause, but does not specify a term of office?

Think about what would happen if they could not be removed except for cause.

Remember civil service

Can the head of a department remove inferior officers he has appointed?

Unless Congress creates a term of office, if you appoint someone, you can fire them.

Terms of office for agency heads create independent agencies

These agencies are still executive branch agencies