II Maoist Naxalite uprising in India Harinda Vidanage PhD Naxalites The Maoist movement also called the Naxalite movement after Naxalbari the name of a rural town where a 1967 peasant uprising ignited this tendency ID: 691511
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "India: Democracy, Nationalism and Confli..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
India: Democracy, Nationalism and Conflict II‘Maoist/Naxalite uprising in India’
Harinda Vidanage PhDSlide2
NaxalitesThe Maoist movement, also called the Naxalite movement, after Naxalbari
the name
of a rural town where a 1967 peasant uprising ignited this tendency
within the
Indian Communist movement, has the New Democratic Revolution as
its declared
objective, the overthrow of the ‘‘semi-feudal, semi-colonial’’
state through
protracted people’s war. Because of this, it has always faced
severe state
repression
. (
Giri
2009)Slide3
Why Naxalite, The word Naxal comes from the village of
Naxalbari
, near
Siliguri
in West Bengal where the movement first originated. The origins of all
Naxalite
groups come from the CPI (ML), the Communist Party of India-Marxist-LeninistSlide4
Until the 1990s the Naxalites were a marginal presence in Indian politics. But in that decade they began working more
closely with
the tribal communities of the Indian heartland.
About 80
million Indians are officially recognized as “tribal”; of
these, some
15 million live in the northeast, in regions untouched
by Hindu
influence. It is among the 65 million
tribals
of the
heartland that
the Maoists have found a most receptive audience.Slide5
TribalsEconomically The tribals are the most deeply disadvantaged segment
of Indian society. As few as 23
percent of
them are literate; as many as 50 percent live under
the poverty
line. The state fails to provide them with
adequate education
, healthcare or sanitation; more actively, it
works to
dispossess them of their land and resourcesSlide6
Tribal ImagesSlide7
Naxal + TribalThe naxals enjoy immense support among the lower strata of the society in what is known as the Red corridor, a collection of states with
active
naxalism
(most of these
atates
are mentioned in the above
para
). The
adivasis
regard the Maoists as their friends for it is these rebels who have stood by them. All the normal channels of redress are closed for them. The police beat them. The political parties – be they the Congress or the
Bharatiya
Janata Party – are with the Salwa Judum (A anti naxalite movement in Chhattisgarh.)The courts do not give them a hearing. The media does not care. Where else will they go except to the Maoists? When the police attack them, it is the Maoists who save them (Awaaz 2010)Slide8
OperationsThey were strongest in the states of Bihar and Andhra Pradesh, where they organized low-caste sharecroppers and laborers to
demand better
terms from their upper-caste landlords.
Naxalite
activities were
open, as when conducted through labor unions, or
illegal, as
when they assassinated a particularly recalcitrant landlord
or made
a daring seizure of arms from a police campSlide9
Two phase struggleThe original struggle was against feudal landlords and landownership
The new struggle is against state domination, modernization and development which parallels the rise of India as a strong economy propelled by capitalism and liberal economic gains.
The issue of identity politics is a strong driver of the conflict Slide10
Red CorridorSlide11Slide12
Nation state and securityManmohan Singh, the Prime Minister of
I
ndia, called Maoist insurrection, “the single biggest internal-security challenge
”
Home Secretary G.K
Pillai
reiterated the magnitude of this threat, saying the Maoists want to completely overthrow the Indian state by 2050. Slide13
Framing of the problem.This security-centric understanding of the Maoist ‘‘problem,’’ is challenged by sections of the dissident left who see it as a socio-economic problem, arising
from deprivation
, loss of livelihood, lack of employment opportunities and abject
poverty, given
a neo-liberal state abdicating all welfare functionsSlide14
Politically the tribals are very poorly represented in the democratic process. In fact, compared with India’s
other subaltern
groups, such as the
Dalits
(former
Untouchables) and
the Muslims, they are well nigh invisible.
Dalits
have
their own, sometimes
very successful, political parties; the
Muslims have
always constituted a crucial vote bank for the
dominant Congress Party.Slide15
Space for expansionThe twin marginalization, economic and political, has opened a space for the Maoists to work inSlide16
Operation Green HuntGreen Hunt either began in July 2009, September 2009 or November 2009. Speaking off record, senior policemen confirmed that the intensification of “search and comb” operations in Chhattisgarh began as early as July last year. In September 2009 the press reported on the progress of “Operation Green Hunt”: a massive 3 day joint operation in which the central
CoBRA
force and state police battled
Naxal
forces in
Dantewada
. (Hindu 2009)Slide17
Chinese connectionCharu Mazumdar, the pioneer of the
N
axalite
movement had said: “China’s Chairman is our Chairman and China’s path is our path”.
While we Indians are sensitized about the ongoing proxy war by Pakistan, there is very little or no consciousness that Maoism or
Naxalism
is actually a proxy war by China being waged against India for last five decades. (Singh 2010)Slide18
IdeologyWhen more than 70 CRPF personnel were martyred in Chhattisgarh, some students of a university in Delhi, created for pioneering research but now considered a leftist bastion, celebrated the tragedy. Some students of the same university had celebrated the Tiananmen Square massacre of students in China in 1989 for what they thought was necessary to prevent China going down the Soviet Union way. This university does not lie in the ‘impoverished, underdeveloped and exploited tribal mineral heartland of India’. Its students thrive in excellent facilities made possible by the tax-payers money. (Singh 2010)