/
SG Electra SG Electra

SG Electra - PowerPoint Presentation

debby-jeon
debby-jeon . @debby-jeon
Follow
392 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-19

SG Electra - PPT Presentation

Presentation PhDresearch Drs Ir Maarten Soetaert UGhent ILVO 2 Content Safety Margin for a selection of marine species Determine the injury dose ID 50 Determine the lethal dose LD ID: 411043

sole pulse effect startle pulse sole startle effect dose frequency species determine marine injury field pulses amp quality safety strength fish type

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SG Electra" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

SG Electra Presentation PhD-research

Drs. Ir Maarten SoetaertUGhent - ILVOSlide2

2Content

‘Safety Margin’ for a selection of marine species

Determine the injury dose (ID

50)

Determine the lethal dose (LD

1

0)

Optimalisation

of startle pulse for sole

At ≠ frequency, field strength, waveform, wavelength, pulse type

Effect of startle pulse for sole on marine species

Effect of electrical pulses on fish qualitySlide3

3Safety Margin (I): idea

Goal: determine the injury dose (ID) and lethal dose (LD) for a selection of marine organisms:

Sole: target species

Cod: top predator, sensitive to pulses

Shrimp: target species

Sandworm: model species for

polychetes

Starting from startle pulse for C

rangon

crangon

At 50 & 100 V/m: 5 Hz → 180 Hz

invertebrate

vertebrateSlide4

4Safety Margin (II):

What?

Injury Dose x% (

IDx

):

frequency at which x % of the exposed animals shows extra injuries

Lethal Dose x% (

LDx

):

frequency at which x % of

the exposed animals dies

In

this

example

:

ID25 = 25Hz

LD50 = 45 Hz

Slide5

5Safety Margin (III): How?

Homogeneous Field

Exposure

(3s

)

2 plate-shaped electrodes

Orientation:

Euthanasia after 14 days

Autopsy

Macroscopic: hemorrhages, color,

spots, deformation, …

Rontgen photos (lateral & dorsal)

Histology: dorsal muscle, kidney,

liver, spleen, intestine, gills, heartSlide6

6Safety Margin

(IV): Why?

What can we learn out of it?

Difference in sensitivity between 4 species

Effect of field strength on effects

(injury/mortality

)

Effect of frequency on effects (injury/mortality)

Kind of injuries function of frequency?

Is there a ‘safe’ range of pulse parameters in which we can apply pulses in justifiable way?

Pulses of

Hovercran

/

Pulskor

/

Pulswing

in safe zone?Slide7

7Content

‘Safe Zone’ for a selection of marine species

Determine the injury dose (ID

50)

Determine the lethal dose (LD

50)

Optimalisation

of startle pulse for sole

At ≠ frequencies, field strengths, waveforms, wavelengths, pulse types

Effect of startle pulse for sole on marine species

Effect of electrical pulses on fish qualitySlide8

8Startle

Pulse for Sole: idea

25 % of sole jumps out of sediment during exposure to startle pulse for

shrimp

(

Chiers

et al., 2011)

Is there a ‘safe’ startle pulse that makes the majority

of the sole jump out of the sediment ?

Varying different parameters: frequency, field strength, pulse form, pulse duration, pulse type

Chiers

et al., 2011, ‘Short-term effects of low frequency pulsed direct current on captive-housed sea fish’, submittedSlide9

9Startle

Pulse for Sole: parameters

Frequency:

Field strength:

Pulse form:

Pulse duration: 0,1 to 0,5

ms

Pulse type:

Time of exposure: 1 to 2 s

Within

Safety

MarginsSlide10

10Startle

Pulse for Sole: how?

Video tracking of reaction during exposure at specific pulse, quantification & comparison

Parameter

Effect score

(A)

Weight

(B)

Total

(T)

3

2

1

= A

x

B

1.

Hight upbove bottom

(cm)

> 15

5 - 15

< 5

3

T

1

2.

Swimming speed

(% of max)

< 75

25 - 50

< 25

1

T

2

3.

Recovery time

(s)

> 3

3 - 1

< 1

2

T

3

TOTAL “EFFECT NUMBER”

(=

assesment

number of observed startle response)

T

1

+ T

2

+ T

3Slide11

11Content

‘Safe Zone’

for

a

selection

of marine species

Determine

the

injury

dose (ID50)

Determine the lethal

dose (LD

50)Optimalisation

of

startle

pulse

for

sole

At ≠

frequency

, field

strength

,

waveform, wavelength, pulse type

Effect of startle pulse for sole on marine species

Effect of electrical pulses

on fish

qualitySlide12

12Startle

Pulse for Sole: Effects

Video tracking of reaction

after

exposure at optimal sole startle pulse

Feeding response

Behavior

Euthanasia & autopsy (

cfr

ID &

LD):

Macroscopic

Rontgen photos

Histology

s

ole

&

c

od

s

ole

&

cod

s

hrimp

&

sandwormSlide13

13Content

‘Safe Zone’ for a selection of marine species

Determine the injury dose (ID

50)

Determine the lethal dose (LD

50)

Optimalisation

of startle pulse for sole

At ≠ frequency, field strength, waveform, wavelength, pulse type

Effect of startle pulse for sole on marine species

Effect of pulses on fish qualitySlide14

14Effect of

pulses on fish quality

Is there an effect on the sole quality?

in appearance?

Pulse fisherman is getting a better price: why?

What/how big is the difference with beam trawl?

in filet quality?

Do electric pulses have an effect on fish decay? (QIM)

f.e

. faster or slower decay

in filet taste?Slide15

Thanks for your attention!

Questions?