PPT-1 1 Transit Score Presentation

with Connecticut DOT Friday September 9 2011 2 2 Agenda Introduction amp Overview of Transit Score   Thomas Marchwinski Sr Director Forecasting amp Research NJ TRANSIT   Background of Transit Score and Use in Planning Smart Growth . Presentation Overview. Learning objectives. Ferry facilities and service. Vessels. Ferry terminals. Operations. Capacity considerations. Learning Objectives. Gain an understanding of the wide variety of vessels, service types, and conditions which influence ferry service. Greg Hughes, UTA Board Chairman. RTC Transit Connections 2013. Converted to Transit. “…. . [it’s] assumed by both the political left and the right that conservatives oppose public transportation, regarding it as nothing more than a form of transportation welfare for those too poor, feeble or feckless to drive”. (and cycling and traffic) planning. Peter.Topaloivc@Hamilton.ca. City of Hamilton – Transportation. Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013. How the Transportation Demand Management Professional views the purpose of TDM. May 19, 2015. Joel Volinski, NCTR Director. Study Sponsor and Objective. Funded through TCRP Synthesis Program (SA-30). Published in Fall of 2014. Identify actions transit agencies have taken to maintain effectiveness during the Great Recession. Lincoln 2014 Place Car Num Team Penalty Cost Score Presentation Score Design Score Acceleration Score Skid Pad Score Autocross Score Endurance Score Efficiency Score Total Score 1 4 Univ of Kansas City of Redding Safety Projects. April 5, 2016 . HSIP Specific:. At least one in every Cycle. 7 Project Awards in last three Cycles . Over $9.5 Million. Others Grant Used for Safety:. Bicycle Transportation Account. Lorraine Ward. Association Manager. The first mentioned team provides the score card and the scorer.. The second mentioned team provides the timing devise and the person to time.. Introduce yourselves! You are part of the court officials and must sit/stand . March 8, 2017. Regional Coordination Transit Study. Presentation Outline. Our Discussion. Overview of Recommendations. History – Where we were. The Process – Where we are. Recommendations – Where we’re going. Learning objectives. Factors . that . determine rail capacity . Line . capacity (number of trains). Person . capacity (number of passengers). Design . capacity. Generalized capacity estimation method. Crises Confronting Baltimore Transit. Transit investment hasn’t focused on promoting . affordable housing. , driving . job creation. , or reducing . violence. Our city is paralyzed by s. low bus service. Rapid Transit Steering Committee. April 30, 2013. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Purpose. To brief Rapid Transit Steering Committee members on the development of a WMATA approach to branding a regional premium transit service. AGENDA. Trial Structure & The Case. Timekeeping & Other Rules. Scoring, Presiding, & Commenting. TRIAL STRUCTURE & THE CASE. Learning about the mock trial world. What is mock trial?. Mock trial is a simulation of a . FY 2011-12. Current Financial Position. Current Operations. Service Statistics/Trends. Funding Statistics/Trends. Other Information/Assumptions. Capital Status Review. CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT. Transit Agency Status. AGENDA. Trial Structure & The Case. Timekeeping & Other Rules. Scoring, Presiding, & Commenting. TRIAL STRUCTURE & THE CASE. Learning about the mock trial world. What is mock trial?. Mock trial is a simulation of a .