Sam Giordanengo Hawaii Community College Terri Manning ATD Data Coach Darlene Pabis Westmoreland County Community College Trish Schade Northern Essex Community College Course Reform Viewpoint ID: 200047
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Accomplishing Reform Through Course Rede..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Accomplishing Reform Through Course Redesign: How Faculty Driven Processes Improve Student Success
Sam Giordanengo, Hawai’i Community College
Terri Manning, ATD Data Coach
Darlene Pabis, Westmoreland County Community College
Trish
Schade
, Northern Essex Community CollegeSlide2
Course Reform …..Viewpoint
Students are there to learn the content.
They should be “college-ready.”
Students should adapt to me. I should not have to adjust my course or methods for them.
Not a lot of energy is given to:
Retention strategies
First year experiences
Developing “good student skills”Slide3
When a New Student Arrives
It’s their first semester.
They complete their admissions form.
Attend orientation (if required), go through placement testing (if required) and see a counselor/advisor (if required)…. and then they register. What do they want to take?
Their general education requirements
Their developmental courses - many are advised into developmental, but don’t take them
Maybe a freshman experience course
Maybe one major course if allowedSlide4
They arrive in your course ….
What is their expectation of these courses?
We make them take a set of general education courses. Why? Why don’t we let them go straight to the major courses and graduate sooner? What do we expect them to accomplish? What skills should they exit these courses with?Slide5
ConnectionsHow do we take their current skills, attitudes and behaviors and move them toward the threshold of where we want them to be?
How can you connect “college skills or good student skills” to the content of your course?
Are there differences between activities or content geared toward retention and those geared toward improving academic skills?Slide6
Course Reform - Some Examples
Support activities
Offer supplemental instruction, service learning opportunities, tutoring, and study groups.
Create a series of success workshops (offered through the tutoring center, library or student success center) and require students attend a set number of them as part of their grade
Create learning communities or linked classes.
Implement an Early Alert System to ensure that struggling students get help. Slide7
Others, cont.
Curriculum and pedagogy
Make instruction in gatekeeper courses more related to real life experiences.
Use techniques such as active/collaborative learning, mini learning communities in the class, and computer-assisted labs.
Establish learning competencies and share them with students.
Allow retesting in courses with sequential content so students can master it.Slide8
Others, cont.
Institute “class conferencing” in classes – instructors meet with students individually on a regular basis.
Used grading rubrics for all assignments and give students a copy beforehand.
Faculty development
Offer professional development for faculty who teach gatekeeper courses.
Let the faculty with great success teach these workshops.
Focus on retention techniques, improving academic skills and student engagementSlide9
Others, cont.
Next Steps
Work with faculty across disciplines to increase the basic skills.
How do the paralegal faculty teach students to become better writers?
How do the culinary faculty improve computational skills?
How do the Nursing faculty improve critical thinking skills in students?
Why do they think this is your job and not theirs?Slide10
What Do We Need to Know?
Are students mastering the content – meeting the learning outcomes? (by this, I mean “how many students meet each learning outcome?)
If yes, then we must address support services, the institutional culture and environment, the delivery method.
If no, then we need to rethink our pedagogy – how we are teaching these courses. Maybe we should break down the curriculum differently.Slide11
As Gatekeeper Faculty…
How do we address their lack of skills?
How do we make them better students and teach content?
How can we address content in other ways than the faculty lecturing or teaching it?
Today, all content is on the internet. How can we use that to our advantage (they don’t have to get it from you)?Slide12
Gatekeeper Faculty
Have more power to influence students than any other group of faculty on the campus (but they don’t often recognize it.)
Are some of the most dedicated and conscientious faculty on the campus.
Typically know what is going on everywhere.
But they all live quite nicely in separate ivory towers (never see themselves as one faculty with one purpose.) When a student exits my course, I never see them again.Slide13
Course Reform from Three CollegesThree different colleges
Hawai’i Community College, Hilo Hawaii
Westmoreland County Community College, Youngwood, Pennsylvania
Northern Essex Community College, Haverhill, Massachusetts
Three different types of courses
A gatekeeper – history course
A developmental – reading course
A student success course – college skillsSlide14
The Process in HawaiiHawai’i Community College, Hilo, Hawaii
Our course had been placed on the gatekeeper list (high enrolled, low success)
The two full time history faculty members were new to the Island of Hawai‘i (one was from eastern Washington state the other from New York City)
The part-time instructors had, in some cases, served the college for over 20 years
We knew we had cultural issues to address
We wanted to include the Hawai‘i Life Styles faculty and counselors as well as our academic dean
We also knew that we needed to incorporate the Hawaiian culture into how we taught our classes
Through an instate innovation grant we were able to pay the lecturers for their time, provide some
makana
(gifts) for the guests, and have a retreat off campus (hotel on the other side of the island)Slide15
Process in Hawaii, cont.
Once we were all in the same room we talked about what each of us did in the classroom, pedagogy, theory of history, and what we saw as weaknesses and strength of our teaching
We also invited a national expert on how the Millennial Generation behaved in the college as compared to our generations (Boomers and
Xʻers
)
At the end of the weekend we pledged to change how we approached our students and how we conducted our classes. One year later we met to report on our progress.
Later that year we were told that history was off the gatekeeper list Slide16
The Process in PennsylvaniaWestmoreland County Community College
Westmoreland did not have true common courses. Faculty teaching any given course, taught different subject matter and with different methodologies. Decided this wasn’t working.
First, we evaluated our
A
ccuplacer
‘cut-off’ scores
(
used the Nelson Denny to
correlate
the change
).
We developed new cut scores for reading.
The fulltime faculty reviewed the syllabi of all
adjunct
faculty
to begin to provide consistency
within
all sections of reading courses.
Changed delivery of reading courses: data suggested that 3 and ½ hour block classes were not providing the retention and persistence.
Collaborated with adjunct faculty on “best practices
” and some came in a taught the fulltime faculty how they taught certain concepts
Developed a “common exit exam’ that measured the course objectives.
Developed a ‘common mid-term exam’ to assist in remediation before the final/exit exam was given.
We created common technology
with pre
diagnosticsSlide17
The Process in Massachusetts, Northern Essex Community College, Haverhill, MA
The ATD First Year Experience strategy team (faculty, staff and administrators) determined the overall goals for a student success course
An approved 3-credit College Success Seminar was already being offered; however, the course did not have an administrative support structure, and was taught by only a few faculty and staff.
Students were free to take the course regardless of where they were in their program.
The team decided two things; to re-work the existing College Success Seminar using the same course description but with updated goals and outcomes.
A small cohort of first-year students with two developmental course placements was selected for the pilot.Slide18
Process in Massachusetts, cont.
A
curriculum committee was formed
representing the science
, academic preparation, and English
departments who had
worked with college success strategies in their courses,
and
had experience with the target population of students with developmental
placements
The
group met monthly and identified key processes already at work at
the college
to bring shape and meaning to the course. Some of the key pieces of the framework
included:
Appreciative
Inquiry
Strengths-based teaching
Process
Management techniques, and
The
principles of NCBI (National Coalition Building Institute).
The
goal was to design a course and instructional system that would allow a cross section of faculty and staff to teach it.Slide19
Process in Massachusetts, cont.
A common curriculum was established so
that we could measure outcomes more
easily
.
The content
of the
course was designed, textbooks identified, a companion was written, and a website was developed for the course.
All course sections used the same curriculum and materials.
A evaluation plan (formative and summative) with outcome measures was developed to assess the
success of the course and the impact it had on students and
instructors.Slide20
Process in Massachusetts, cont.
A curriculum coordinator was selected for the course for
the two-year CSS pilot.
Her
role was
to: recruit
new
instructors and students,
generate awareness of CSS college-wide, manage the data collection and
analysis,
conduct research of other FYE
programs,
and to work with the curriculum committee to make informed recommendations for scaling up the CSS course in the future.
At the end of the
two-year
pilot,
the committee made some major revisions to the course to improve student engagement, faculty buy-in, and course outcomes.Slide21
What Was Learned Through the ProcessLessons……Slide22
Lessons Learned – Hawai’iWe needed to let go of our egos and ask
ourselves
why we taught the way we did.
For
example:
Why
did we have timed tests?
Why
did we only have a certain number of exams in the year (why not more or less?).
Why
did we take roll or why did it count towards the grade?
Why
didn’t we allow students to record a lecture?
Why
were we so strict on testing make up policy?Slide23
Lessons……
We needed to let go of the notion that we
did
things for “job training.”
For example:
If
we counted off points for being late or missing a class we claimed that we were preparing the student for the “real world” so when they got a job they would know to be on time.
We
came to the conclusion after some debate that it is not our job to teach students about job skills, it is our job to teach them history.
The
fact was most of our students did live in the real world with a job already, and kids, and elderly relatives that depended on them. They were all full up on “real world” and us having hard line classroom policies that did nothing to further their knowledge of history it just added to their burden.Slide24
Lessons…..Bringing in local culture was not hard and all that it required was that the teacher be sincere in how they included local culture in the classroom.
We needed to listen to our students more and figure out what they were expecting to learn in a history class and for them to be honest about what they saw as the value of history (we eventually had a pre and post class survey that asked 5 questions on the student’s view of what history meant to them).Slide25
Lesson, PennsylvaniaData suggested that long blocks of time
did
not provide students with increased
persistence
and
retention – so we followed the data.
‘New
cut –off’ scores improved persistence to at least one semester beyond the developmental course.
Adjunct faculty
wanted to participate and their participation
improved by approx.. 65% (based on meetings, data collection,
etc.)
Common
midterms helped students learn -
has helped improve the retention of students by identifying weakness by the 8
th
to 10 week of the semester
.
Then we address those weaknesses.Slide26
Lessons, MassachusettsSmall, nimble, thoughtful teams can move a
project
swiftly along when the right people are at
the
table. Find those who are really invested in student success and give them the freedom to be creative.
(From the coordinator): We learned a lot from our two year pilot:
the Strengths Quest focus and Reading Apprenticeship skills and strategies were very impactful and useful for students and faculty.
the set curriculum did not work well for all instructors and students.
we needed more clearly defined Goals and Outcomes for the course to give instructors the academic freedom to design a course that allowed them to teach to their strengths. Slide27
Lessons, cont.
(From the coordinator): We learned a
lot
from our two year pilot
:
we needed to create rubrics by which to measure these goals and outcomes; the rubrics would need to be teaching tools for the teachers and learning tools for the students.
a theme, based upon a book like
The Other Wes Moore
, was essential in making the course more meaningful and effective for teachers and students.
a common textbook that includes chapters that directly support each of the goals and outcomes and pertinent information for student success at our specific college was important. This common textbook adds credibility to the course and offers students and instructors a solid base from which to proceed.
it is essential to recruit instructors from across disciplines to have broad-based advocacy for the course
annual instructor trainings are key to maintaining the integrity of the course and for maintaining a community of teachers that support and encourage each other. The spirit of instructor collaboration is crucial to our program’s success.
learning communities linking CSS with another content area course provide a context and the opportunity for immediate application of the skills taught in the CSS course. Slide28
how would you have done things differently?
If you had known then what you know
now…. Slide29
Comments, Hawai’iI would have had more follow up on
pledges
that we all said we would implement in the classroom. It was three semesters later that we met again as a department and compared notes as to what we really had done and how it worked out.Slide30
Comments, PennsylvaniaI believe that understanding ‘data’ was
and
is crucial to the success of the program.
We
used to make decisions based on “ I feel” or “I believe”, or “I know” (just because I’ve been teaching for x number of years. I think if I would have had more time discussing ‘how to ask the data questions’ I would have saved time. )Slide31
Comments, Massachusetts
Identify the CSS coordinator from the start and pay her
to
do the work. At NECC we have wonderful people willing
to
pitch in- but they should be compensated. This is a very large undertaking and if we want to support faculty they way we want our faculty to support students, then we need to create a structure that demonstrates the institutional commitment to the project. The curriculum committee worked diligently and continues to work together to develop faculty trainings. In most cases, we are still doing this as an add-on to the rest of our work and responsibilities.
(
From the coordinator): I am not sure I would do many things differently. I think we had to go through the process we went through to learn what worked for our college and the student population. I can’t imagine how else we would have gathered the wisdom we found in trial and experimentation. We learned a lot about what worked well and what didn’t work well, and we did a lot of careful measuring to be sure our changes were informed and sound. Slide32
Comments, MassachusettsMy only regret
….at
the start of
implementing
the two year pilot is that I
did
not have the breadth of knowledge I have now about FYE scholarship. I still have a long way to go in terms of learning from the current scholarship on student success, but I work hard to build my knowledge base on what is current in FYE scholarship. If I had had the opportunity to study this scholarship before I became the CSS coordinator, I think I would have done some things differently, or been less stressed about certain aspects of the course. Slide33
What two or three things are most critical when working with and motivating faculty to accept and be a catalyst for course redesign?
Putting on your teaching hat……Slide34
Comments from Hawai’i
Getting over the fear of change and the excuse
to
not change “But we’ve always done it that way!” If something in the classroom is not working then it needs to be changed.
Faculty need to know that our students are not us. That is, they might be in our class just to graduate and don’t care about the content exactly. It is not personal they are not going to spend their lives in academia… like us. ;-)
Pride and ego can crush students and prevent them from success. Changing a class that you teach in order to reach more students requires
really
putting the student first.Slide35
Comments from Pennsylvania
At first, faculty
thought that
AtD
was the latest
‘
educational buzz’ word. We had to prove that
accountability
was critical to success in business and also is critical to retention and persistence in college.
Keeping the “idea alive.” We discussed
AtD
at most faculty meetings, general college meetings and in the college paper.
Getting the ‘right people on the bus’!!! The people who were invited to become part of the
AtD
initiative had to be people who were open minded and non-resistant. If the administration didn’t buy into the initiative and select the people who were willing to look at the project in an objective manner, the program probably wouldn’t have worked.
Also, the financial backing of the President and the board to provide stipends for the initiative.Slide36
Comments from Massachusetts
Invite them, support them, allow them to dig in
and
do the work, but don’t bog them down with the administrative details. The Dean and chair of the original curriculum committee took care of a lot of the details for the trainings, ordering of books, finding resources, and organization of meetings, materials, etc. Some of what we take for granted in administration
can
slow progress to a stop.
An
identified champion for the program is essential. Once we had formalized roles and responsibilities and where the CSS course would be housed, many of these problems solved themselves because they became aligned with college process, but in the infancy stages, clear lines of communication and roles and responsibilities should be defined.Slide37
Comments …..From the coordinator:
1. Be transparent
and vocal about the pilot and
what is
learned.
We
had to show our process and make sure we and the college at large understood the goals of our pilot and the ways by which we measured our success. We worked hard to gather a lot of qualitative and quantitative data to make sure we made sound decisions. We continue this practice as we monitor the newly redesigned CSS course we have in place now at the college.
Faculty
and Administration are more likely to buy into a program if it is clearly defined and measured. If they can see results, they are more likely to support and even participate in the program.Slide38
Comments….
R
ecruit
key faculty and staff members.
A
lot of
time was spent
working on recruitment. I presented
at
staff meetings, department meetings, and division meetings, explaining the course and the impact it was having on students. The presentation was designed to inform and also, hopefully, recruit new faculty members.
I
also listened to my students. I listened for what teachers they talked about, the teachers they said connected with them and made them feel good about learning, and I made a list of names. I also paid attention to the employee recognition awards and newsletters to read about the instructors featured in these ways. Then, I contacted instructors either in person or by email and asked them if they’d be interested in teaching the course. Of all the recruitment efforts, this last one was the most effective. Slide39
Comments…..
Provide
enough support for faculty and
staff
who teach the course.
We
held a comprehensive training event to help our
new
and experienced faculty understand the Five
Goals
and Outcomes for the course, we built an
instructor
resource site, and we strongly encourage
collaboration
.
We
often share ideas, and we continually learn from
each
other. The spirit of collaboration amongst CSS
instructors
is something I strive for because I think a
community
of teachers is the most powerful change
agent
or vehicle for
motivating the college. Slide40
Comments….
Integrate
student services administration
and
staff into the curriculum. Another key
piece
in promoting and developing the course was collaborating with student services, like financial aid, advising, student success center, the library, and student activities.
Our
curriculum invites collaborations with many
key
areas of student services so that students
better
understand the services available to them
and
their success. By integrating student services
into
our curriculum, the course became a
collaborative
venture that involved very talented
student
success experts at our college. Slide41
What AdviceWould you give other colleges?Slide42
Comments from Hawai’i
Keep your ego in check; the classes you teach are
not
for you they are for the students and while these students do not know what they do not know
- it
is up to you to guide them and help them understand. And when they challenge you on a point (or on your opinion of the facts) do not let that affect their standing in the class; academically or socially.
“Don’t be in a hurry to condemn because he doesn’t do what you do, or think as you think, or as fast. There was a time when you didn’t know what you know today.”
Malcolm
X
“It is important that students bring a certain ragamuffin barefoot irreverence to their studies; they are not here to worship what is known but to question it.”
-
Jacob
BronowskiSlide43
Comments from Pennsylvania
Expect resistance at first.
Be prepared to defend and abandon parts of the initiative
Ask for help when you need it. You can’t do this alone.
Develop a relationship with your coach that is based on mutual respect.
Be prepared to hear—“data suggests something
other
than you wanted!””
Communication—a document/mechanism in place for new faculty/administrators that provides information about the achievements so that previously learned lessons are not abandoned but improved.Slide44
Comments from MassachusettsCreate the course, track the success
and
be open to revising each and every semester! We continue to learn, grow, and enhance the quality of this course. Remain open to what you learn, listen to the students, create ongoing learning opportunities for faculty and find new and innovative ways to be better!!Slide45
Comments from Massachusetts(From the coordinator): Make informed
decisions
about your program. Learn from
students
and faculty and staff participating in your program by collecting data that will help gauge their experiences as participants in the course; conduct research on other FYE programs at other schools that serve a population similar to your own; create a team approach for all aspects of the course. Collaborate with student services; use the National Resource Center as a guide for current research and scholarship on FYE; make informed decisions. Slide46
What Happened in the courses?
So…….Slide47
History in Hawai’i
Hawai‘i
Community College - History Courses
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
A-C Grades
% A-C Grades
A-C Grades
% A-C Grades
A-C Grades
% A-C Grades
A-C Grades
% A-C Grades
HIST 151
106
71.6%
173
77.6%
157
77.7%
162
71.4%
HIS 152
54
58.1%
82
75.9%
119
75.8%
136
70.5%
Total Grades
160
66.4%
255
77.0%
276
76.9%
298
71.0%Slide48
Reading in Pennsylvania
Westmoreland County Community College - Reading 050 and 080 Success
Fall 06
Fall 07
Fall 08
Fall 09
Fall 10
Fall 11
Total Enrollment
5,982
6,237
6,431
7,076
7,403
Number Completing the Term
4,748
4,979
5,117
5,568
5,761
Percent Completing the Term
79.4%
79.8%
79.6%
78.7%
77.8%
Total Enrolled in Reading 050
67
114
210
257
269
Successful Completers of Reading 050
40
76
141
184
183
Percent Successfully Completing Reading 050
59.7%
66.7%
67.1%
71.6%
68.0%
Fall to Spring Retention of Reading 050 Students
92.5%
93.4%
92.2%
93.5%
88.5%
Total Enrolled in Reading 080
440
461
538
583
633
626
Successful Completers of Reading 080
323
351
397
445
456
432
Percent Successfully Completing Reading 080
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
Fall to Spring Retention of Reading 080 Students
88.9%
88.0%
89.4%
87.6%
89.9%
90.5%Slide49
Student Success in Massachusetts
Northern Essex Community College
All Students
CSS Completers (A-C)
New Students Fall 2010 to Spring 2011
64.2%
72.2%
New Students Fall 2010 to Fall 2011
50.3%
93.5%
New Students Fall 2011 to Spring 2012
69.3%
96.9%
New, Full-time, Degree-seeking, Students Fall 2010 to Spring 2011
77.1%
91.7%
New, FT, Degree-seeking, Fall 2010 to Fall 2011
60.2%
69.4%
New, FT, Degree-seeking, Fall 2011 to Spring 2012
80.5%
96.7%Slide50
Student Success, cont.
Northern Essex Community College
- College
Success Seminar
Fall
2009
Spring
2010
Fall
2010
Spring
2011
Fall
2011
Spring
2012
Fall
2012
Sections
3
2
12
6
13
8
30
Enrollment
54
35
208
79
248
133
574
CSS Completers A-C Developmental Course Completion
82%
79%
89%
80%
89%
Non CSS A-C Developmental
Course
Completion*
72%
59%
72%
81%
62%
CSS Completer Term GPA
3
3.1
3
3.2
3.1
Non CSS Completer Term GPA*
2.5
1.8
2.3
2.6
2.2
CSS Completer Average Term Credits
10.6
10.1
10.8
8.4
9.9
Non CSS Completer Average Term Credits*
8.6
7.9
8.1
7.8
5.0Slide51
QuestionsWhat 3-5 courses are in most need of redesign at your college?
What are your greatest barriers to accomplishing course redesign at your college?
Questions?Slide52
Contact
Sam Giordanengo
History Instructor
Hawai’i Community College
Humanities Department
200 West
Kāwili
Street
Hilo, HI 96720
(808) 934-2589
samuelg@hawaii.edu
Trish Schade
Assoc. Professor, Dev. Reading, College Success Seminar
Northern Essex Community College
79 Ward Street
Lexington, MA 02421
(978) 556-3414 (W)
pschade@necc.mass.edu
Darlene Pabis
Westmoreland County Community College
147
Pavillion
Lane
Youngwood, PA 15697
(724)925-4289 (office)
pabisd@wccc.edu
Terri Manning
Data Coach
Central Piedmont Community College
P.O. Box 35009
Charlotte, NC 28235
Phone Number: (704) 330-6592
FAX Number: (704) 330-6013
terri.manning@cpcc.edu