/
Chapter 2:  Ethics and  Business Decision Making Chapter 2:  Ethics and  Business Decision Making

Chapter 2: Ethics and Business Decision Making - PowerPoint Presentation

ellena-manuel
ellena-manuel . @ellena-manuel
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-31

Chapter 2: Ethics and Business Decision Making - PPT Presentation

2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be copied scanned or duplicated in whole or in part except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a passwordprotected website for classroom use ID: 705313

ethical ethics corporate business ethics ethical business corporate approaches reasoning based duty action foreign companies cont

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 2: Ethics and Business Decisio..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chapter 2: Ethics and Business Decision Making

©

2013

Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.Slide2

Business Ethics

Ethics is the study of right and wrong behavior; whether an action is fair, right or just.

In business, ethical decisions are the

application of moral and ethical principles to the marketplace and workplace.

2Slide3

Business EthicsWhy Is Business Ethics Important?

Directors

and Officers owe a complex set of ethical duties to

their stakeholders (internal and external).When these duties conflict, ethical dilemmas are created.

3Slide4

Business Ethics

The Moral Minimum.

Normally considered as mere compliance with the law.

“Gray Areas” in the Law.Make it difficult for companies to navigate and forecast.

4Slide5

Business Ethics

Short-Run Profit Maximization.

Some argue a businesses only goal should be to maximize profit. But executives need to distinguish between short-term and long-term maximization.

CASE 2.1

United States v. Skilling

(

2010).

What did Skilling do that was unethical?

5Slide6

Business Ethics

“Gray Areas” in the Law.

Make it difficult for companies to navigate and forecast.

CASE 2.2

Mathews v. B and

K

Foods, Inc.

(2011).

What would you have done if you were the manager? If you were the employee?

6Slide7

Business Ethics

Importance of Ethical Leadership.

Attitude

of Top Management.Behavior of Owners and Managers.

CASE 2.3 Krasner v. HSH Nordbank AG (2010).

Did the plaintiff prove the incidents and environment of sexual favoritism were related to

his

gender?

7Slide8

Business Ethics

Creating Ethical Codes of Conduct.

One of the most effective ways to promote ethical behavior in an organization.

Ethics Training for Employees.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and web-based reporting systems (EthicsPoint).

8Slide9

Ethical Transgressions byFinancial Institutions

Corporate Stock Buybacks.

Rationale: Corporate management believes stock is undervalued, so instead of issuing dividends it buys stock in the market, thus boosting share value.

9Slide10

Ethical Transgressions byFinancial Institutions

Startling Executive Decisions at American International Group (AIG).

Executive Bonuses.

10Slide11

Approaches to

Ethical

Reasoning

Duty

Based Ethics

- derived from religious and philosophical principles.

Religious Ethical Standards

.

Kantian Ethics

.

The Principle of Rights. 

11Slide12

Duty-Based Ethics.Religious Ethical Standards

.

The

rightness or wrongness of an action is usually judged according to its conformity to an absolute rule that commands a particular form of behavior. 

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

12Slide13

Duty-Based Ethics.Religious Ethical Standards

.

The motive of the actor is irrelevant in judging the rightness or the wrongness of the action.

These rules often involve an element of compassion.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

13Slide14

Duty-Based Ethics.Religious Ethical Standards

.

The motive of the actor is irrelevant in judging the rightness or the wrongness of the action.

These rules often involve an element of compassion.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

14Slide15

Duty-Based Ethics.Kantian Ethics.

Premised on the belief that general guiding principles for moral behavior can be derived from human nature.

The

categorical imperative is a central postulate of Kantian ethics. 

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

15Slide16

Duty-Based Ethics.Kantian Ethics (cont’d).

The rightness or wrongness of an action is judged by estimating the consequences that would follow if everyone in a society performed the act under consideration.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

16Slide17

Duty-Based Ethics.Principle of Rights.

Belief that every duty gives rise to a corresponding right, deeply embedded in Western culture.

Ethicality of an action is judged by how the consequences of the action will affect the rights of others.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

17Slide18

Outcome-based Ethics: Utilitarianism. Action is ethical based on whether it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

If it affects the majority adversely, it is morally wrong.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

18Slide19

Outcome-based Ethics: Utilitarianism. Applying the utilitarian theory requires:

Determination of individuals affected;

Cost-Benefit analysis, and

Choice among alternative actions

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

19Slide20

Corporate Social Responsibility.

Those who manage corporations should be accountable to society for their actions.

Stakeholder Approach

: corporations have a duty not only to shareholders but other groups (stakeholders) affected by corporate actions. 

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

20Slide21

Corporate Social Responsibility (cont’d).

Corporate Citizenship

: promote goals that society considers worthwhile and take positive steps towards solving problems.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

21Slide22

Corporate Social Responsibility (cont’d).

Corporate Citizenship

.

A Way of Doing Business. Poll found that 70% of executives polled agreed that corporate citizenship should be a priority.But not all socially responsible activities benefit a company.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

22Slide23

Corporate Social Responsibility (cont’d).

Corporate Citizenship

.

Employee Recruiting and Retention. Younger employees look for firms that are committed to socially responsible goals and community projects.

Approaches to Ethical Reasoning

23Slide24

Making Ethical Business

Decisions

George S. May company has provided six guidelines:

The law.

Rules and procedures.

Values.

Conscience.

Promises.

Heroes (role models).

24Slide25

Practical Solutions to Corporate Ethics Questions

Corporate-Ethics.us has devised a procedure:

Inquiry.

Discussion.

Decision.

Justification.

Evaluation.

25Slide26

Business Ethics on

a Global Level

American companies must be trained in cross-cultural business practices.

Monitoring of Employment

Practices of Foreign Suppliers.

Corporate Watch groups can

hold corporations accountable.

26Slide27

Business Ethics on

a Global Level

Foreign

Corrupt Practices Act.Prohibition Against Bribery of Foreign Officials. But FCPA does not permit “grease” payments to minor officials.

Nor does FCPA prohibit payments to foreign officials which are lawful in that country.

27Slide28

Business Ethics on

a Global Level

Foreign

Corrupt Practices Act (cont’d).

Nor does FCPA prohibit payments to private companies, unless the US firm knows the payments will go to an official.

28Slide29

Business Ethics on

a Global Level

Foreign

Corrupt Practices Act (cont’d).

Bribery by Foreign Companies.

Accounting Requirements.

Penalties for Violations: companies up to $2 million in fines, individuals up to $100,000, and up to 5 years in prison.

29