/
Chapter 20. The Financial System Chapter 20. The Financial System

Chapter 20. The Financial System - PowerPoint Presentation

ellena-manuel
ellena-manuel . @ellena-manuel
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-07

Chapter 20. The Financial System - PPT Presentation

Homework P 591 1 Financial System 101 Channels funds from borrowers to lenders Maturity transformation Pools risk for those who are risk averse Allows for diversification Equity ID: 557023

rates financial interest crisis financial rates crisis interest recovery recessions recession risk money investment policy fed regulation fannie tight effective mae freddie

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 20. The Financial System" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chapter 20. The Financial System

Homework: P. 591 #1Slide2

Financial System 101

Channels

funds from borrowers to lenders.

Maturity transformation.

Pools

risk for those who are risk averse.

Allows for diversification.

Equity

and bonds.

There

are several types of financial intermediaries.

In finance, there is asymmetric information. Also, moral hazard.

Favorably mentions Muhammad

Yunus

and the

Grameen

Bank.Slide3

Anatomy of a Financial Crisis, p. 576 ff.

Speculative bubble

Heavily leveraged financial institutions become insolvent

Falling confidence contaminates otherwise healthy financial

institutions, leading to ‘fire sales’

Credit crunch

Recession as loans to do business are no longer available

Vicious circle feeds on itself

Reference to

Rogoff

and Reinhart “This Time is Different” (2009).

There is a suggestion that recessions due to financial crises are different

from those that arise from ‘normal’ declines in investment, gov’t

spending, etc. Decline is more rapid, recovery is slower.Slide4

Krugman on Financial Crises:

NYT

yesterday

… So

it has been a terrible seven years, and even a string of good job reports won’t undo the damage. Why was it so bad?

You often hear claims, sometimes from pundits who should know better, that nobody predicted a sluggish recovery, and that this proves that mainstream macroeconomics is all wrong. The truth is that many economists, myself included,

predicted a slow recovery

from the very beginning. Why?

The answer, in brief, is that there are recessions and then there are recessions. Some recessions are deliberately engineered to cool off an overheated, inflating economy. For example, the Fed caused the 1981-82 recession with tight-money policies that temporarily

sent interest rates

to almost 20 percent. And ending that recession was easy: Once the Fed decided that we had suffered enough, it relented, interest rates tumbled, and it was morning in America.

But

“postmodern” recession

s, like the downturns of 2001 and 2007-9, reflect bursting bubbles rather than tight money, and they’re hard to end; even if the Fed cuts interest rates all the way to zero, it may find itself pushing on a string, unable to have much of a positive effect. As a result, you don’t expect to see V-shaped recoveries like 1982-84 — and sure enough, we didn’t.

This doesn’t mean that we were fated to experience a seven-year slump. We could have had a much faster recovery if the U.S. government had ramped up public investment and put more money in the hands of families likely to spend it. Slide5

Figure 20-2, p. 580. Anatomy of a Financial CrisisSlide6

Figure 20-1. p. 578. The TED SpreadSlide7

Who should be blamed for the financial crisis of 2008-09? (

pp. 580-81)

Federal Reserve:

(previously kept interest

rates too low, encouraging borrowing and housing investments.

Home buyers: were reckless, gambled, defaulted

Mortgage brokers pushed excess borrowing

Investment banks: bundled mortgages (mortgage backed securities) and sold them, often to sophisticated borrowers

Rating agencies; operated on dubious assumptions

Government regulators: Politicians had encouraged home buying (reduction of interest rates, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

)

Policy makers who pushed home ownership, subsidized mortgages through tax deductions, and discouraged effective regulation, including via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Is he avoiding criticizing academic economists?Slide8

Policy

Response in the US: (pp. 581-82)

Countercyclical monetary and fiscal policy

Limited by liquidity trap, size of deficit/debt

Fed as Lender

of

Last

R

esort

“Propped up Financial System” (bailed out commercial and shadow

banks – also, GM and Chrysler)

Reduce excessive risk taking:

Dodd-Frank

Act

More Effective Regulation

.

Note the asymmetry in terms of the crisis starting in the US, then contaminating European markets, where the damage has been larger. Of course, theirs is also a ‘sovereign debt’ crisis, which is structurally different.