PPT-Children’s Book Critique

Multicultural teachingeduc255 Jessica risch CHILDRENS BOOK CRITIQUE Corduroy By Don Freeman Viking Press 1968 Disney Doc McStuffins All Stuffed Up By Catherine Hapka. The critique is based mainly on C&H (2004), which extends and revises their earlier work, and on Collier (2000a), which provides a more elaborate theoretical exposition. John Maynard Keynes, What to do when “Art 1” is grades . 7-12. The Problem(s). D. espite “Art 1” being the first art class students have taken since Elementary School, . s. tudents of different ages have different ability levels and maturity levels. Admin thinks that 12 thru 18 year olds should be taught the same material and be held to the same standards because they are in the same class. . John Dryzek. (CRICOS) #00212K. Context. (CRICOS) #00212K. Deliberative democracy’s standards: communication should. Be non-coercive. Induce reflection (listening and respect). Connect particular interests to more general principles. Can critical thinking and sexism co-exist? . Exploring the moral . and political discourses surrounding student critically in higher education . Emily Danvers. University of Sussex. Centre for Higher Education & Equity Research (CHEER). April 2014 Argument & Critique, spring 2014 1 Shaken Baby Syndrome : Inadequate Logic , Unvalidated Theory, Insufficient Science Su san E. Luttner Technical writer and editor, Palo Alto, California Pablo Picasso. . Les Demoiselles . d’Avignon. .. 1907. ART CRITIQUE. 1. DESCRIPTION (What do you see?). Pablo Picasso. a) Artist: . Title:. Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Year:. 1907. Medium:. Oil on Canvas. Complete abstract critiques.... A comment on grades.... Where does your grade for this class come from?. From the syllabus.... Pretty simple. A comment on grades.... Where does your grade for this class come from?. Pablo Picasso. . Les Demoiselles . d’Avignon. .. 1907. ART CRITIQUE. 1. DESCRIPTION (What do you see?). Pablo Picasso. a) Artist: . Title:. Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Year:. 1907. Medium:. Oil on Canvas. PHED . 3. Sport Psychology. Arousal. Arousal . A2 PE. Starter Activity. Write down on the mini-whiteboards what you think is meant by the term “The Zone”.. What do athlete’s feel like when they are in . What you need to know to about critiquing . Fault vs. Structure. Criticism finds fault. It states only problems without presenting evidence. It is based only on emotion.. Critique looks at structure. It looks at the “How,” “What,” and “Worth.” . A fresh look at how three important twentieth-century British thinkers viewed capitalism through a moral rather than material lensWhat\'s wrong with capitalism? Answers to that question today focus on material inequality. Led by economists and conducted in utilitarian terms, the critique of capitalism in the twenty-first century is primarily concerned with disparities in income and wealth. It was not always so. The Moral Economists reconstructs another critical tradition, developed across the twentieth century in Britain, in which material deprivation was less important than moral or spiritual desolation.Tim Rogan focuses on three of the twentieth century\'s most influential critics of capitalism-R. H. Tawney, Karl Polanyi, and E. P. Thompson. Making arguments about the relationships between economics and ethics in modernity, their works commanded wide readerships, shaped research agendas, and influenced public opinion. Rejecting the social philosophy of laissez-faire but fearing authoritarianism, these writers sought out forms of social solidarity closer than individualism admitted but freer than collectivism allowed. They discovered such solidarities while teaching economics, history, and literature to workers in the north of England and elsewhere. They wrote histories of capitalism to make these solidarities articulate. They used makeshift languages of tradition and custom to describe them until Thompson patented the idea of the moral economy. Their program began as a way of theorizing everything economics left out, but in challenging utilitarian orthodoxy in economics from the outside, they anticipated the work of later innovators inside economics.Examining the moral cornerstones of a twentieth-century critique of capitalism, The Moral Economists explains why this critique fell into disuse, and how it might be reformulated for the twenty-first century. ________________________________________ We gain by not treating one another as neighbors. Labor is the most scarce of all the primary means of production. Simply think of the state as a criminal band. The writers of these remarks are among the defunct economists whose ideology has dominated the past few decades. Their thoughts, and the policies that spring from them, have brought us high unemployment, glaring inequalities, exorbitant debts, social disintegration, industrial decay, deteriorating public services, and most recently the monstrous crash of 2008. Here is a book that exposes and explains the underlying ideology of the \'neoconservative\' movement, obsessed with financial deregulation, unshackled competition, maximization of profits and shrinkage of the public sector. This \'neoconservative\' movement, writes author Angus Sibley, has fooled a great many people by the simple expedient of claiming that it alone supports true \'freedom\', while its political rivals favor policies that lead inevitably to totalitarian dictatorship. In reality, the author says, such talk is nonsensical. Many free, democratic countries have long pursued socially progressive policies without degenerating into dictatorship. Meanwhile, in the \'Anglo-Saxon\' countries especially, what neoconservatives call \'freedom\' has turned out to be the liberty of wealthy capitalists to subvert the political process, to dominate economic decision-making, and generally to take advantage of everyone else. Moreover, despite its un-Christian behavior, this group has succeeded in persuading certain churches to lend it their support, and even argues that its ideology is compatible with the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. This book offers a critique of the libertarian \'Austrian school\' of free-market economics from experience of real-world economic life and also from the wisdom traditions of Judaism and Christianity, and especially from Catholic Social Teaching. It draws upon the author\'s professional experience in economics and his theological knowledge to show how libertarian economic theory and practice, as proposed by the \'Austrian school\', are radically challenged by Catholic teaching. The author profoundly critiques the major libertarian theorists of the \'Austrian school\', namely Carl Menger, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, and Murray Rothbard. In addition, he reports on several Catholic thinkers who have defended or written positively about the Austrian school or its theorists. These include Michael Novak of the American Enterprise Institute, Robert A. Sirico of the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, and Thomas E. Woods, Jr. of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He concludes the book by asking the serious question of whether a supposedly Catholic defense of libertarian economics does not actually constitute an understanding of the human person and human society that is heretical to the Catholic tradition. Angus Sibley\'s book is published by Pax Romana / Catholic Movement for Intellectual and Cultural Affairs - USA, the US intellectual-professional federation of the worldwide Pax Romana movement devoted to the study and promotion Catholic social teaching. The books Preface is written by Joe Holland, President of Pax Romana\'s US intellectual-professional federation. Partnering in publishing the book are two US organizations equally committed to Catholic Social Teaching and especially to its defense of labor unions, namely Catholic Scholars for Worker Justice and the Catholic Labor Network. ___________________________________________________________________________ In Critique of Black Reason eminent critic Achille Mbembe offers a capacious genealogy of the category of Blackness—from the Atlantic slave trade to the present—to critically reevaluate history, racism, and the future of humanity. Mbembe teases out the intellectual consequences of the reality that Europe is no longer the world\'s center of gravity while mapping the relations among colonialism, slavery, and contemporary financial and extractive capital. Tracing the conjunction of Blackness with the biological fiction of race, he theorizes Black reason as the collection of discourses and practices that equated Blackness with the nonhuman in order to uphold forms of oppression. Mbembe powerfully argues that this equation of Blackness with the nonhuman will serve as the template for all new forms of exclusion. With Critique of Black Reason, Mbembe offers nothing less than a map of the world as it has been constituted through colonialism and racial thinking while providing the first glimpses of a more just future.  This crucial expansion on social justice discourse explores practical applications for activist thought migrating from the community into the academy.