PPT-“ Mixed Methods in Program Evaluation”

Presented by Tom Chapel Thomas J Chapel MA MBA Tchapelcdcgov Chief Evaluation Officer 4046392116 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agenda 1 The why and how . Program Evaluation”. Presented by Tom Chapel. Thomas J. Chapel, MA, MBA Tchapel@cdc.gov. Chief Evaluation Officer 404-639-2116. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Agenda. 2 – 269 15 MIXED METHODS RESEARCH John W. Creswell M ixed methods has emerged in the last few years as a research approach popular in many disciplines and countries, and supported through diver Day 3 Mixed Methods. Prof. Donna M. Mertens. Gallaudet University. Almaty. , Kazakhstan. July 2011. Three days together. IPEN Almaty Kazakhstan July 2011 Mertens Mixed Methods. Day 1: What is the role of the evaluator?. 7. th. ESRC Research Methods Festival . 6. th. July 2015 - . Bath. Dr Jenni . Burt. In this session. What are mixed and multi methods approaches?. When might you use them?. How can you integrate quantitative and qualitative data . Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn. Nick Saxton. Fall 2014. Agenda. Quasi-evaluation studies. Activity (if time allows). Quasi-evaluation studies. Quasi-evaluation studies. Address specific questions (often employing a wide range of methods. [. rapid] evaluations. Michael Woolcock. Lead Social Development Specialist. Development Research Group, World Bank. Santo Domingo. November 14, 2011. Primary source material. Bamberger, Michael, . Vijayendra. Gautam Rao. University of California, Berkeley. * ** Presentation credit: Temina Madon. Impact. Evaluation. The “final” outcomes we care about. - Identify and measure them. . Measuring Impacts. Objectives. To . identify the advantages and disadvantages of employing multiple research methods;. To consider those factors that influence the choice of research method and sequence of the multiple methods;. & Intimate Partner Violence in LMICs. *An Inside View*. AM Buller, A Peterman, M Ranganathan, . A Bleile, M Hidrobo & L Heise. Overall Aims. Review . quantitative. and . qualitative. evidence linking cash transfers (CT) and IPV, focusing on . Non-experimental methods for transport impact evaluation Kevin Croke ieConnect impact evaluation workshop Lisbon, Portugal July 17, 2017 overview In this sessions, we will discuss: the logic of impact evaluation Advanced Methods Webinars: Integrating Mixed Methods in Health Services and Delivery System Research Presenters: Benjamin Crabtree, PhD Michael K. Magill, MD Debra L. Scammon, PhD Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel, MHA, PhD(c) Impact Evaluation: . Pros . & Cons. GMEF FORUM IN KUMASI. 16. TH. March, 2017. By. Mrs.. . Dede. . Bedu-Addo. ,. Coordinator,. (GMEF). Acknowledging . inputs . from: . Tamale, UDS:. Prof. . Seidu. Conducting Mixed-Method EvaluationsVERSION 1JUNE2013INTRODUCTIONOver the past three decades evaluators and others in the development field have increasingly recognized that incorporating multiple meth InterAction with 31nancial support from the Rockefeller Foundation The other notes in this series are Introduction to Impact Evaluation Linking Monitoring Evaluation to Impact Evaluation and Use of I