PPT-The Analysis (Co-)Sparse Model

Origin Definition Pursuit DictionaryLearning and Beyond Michael Elad The Computer Science Department The Technion Israel Institute of technology Haifa 32000 Israel Mathematics amp Image Analysis MIA 2012 Workshop Paris . Raja . Giryes. ICASSP 2011. Volkan. Cevher. Agenda. The sparse approximation problem. Algorithms and pre-run guarantees. Online performance guarantees. Performance bound. Parameter selection. 2. Sparse approximation. to Multiple Correspondence . Analysis. G. Saporta. 1. , . A. . . Bernard. 1,2. , . C. . . Guinot. 2,3. 1 . CNAM, Paris, France. 2 . CE.R.I.E.S., Neuilly sur Seine, France. 3 . Université. . François Rabelais. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. . Tibshirani. Biostatistics, 2008. Presented by . Minhua. Chen. 1. Motivation. Mathematical Model. Mathematical Tools. Graphical LASSO. Related papers. 2. Outline. Motivation. Aditya. Chopra and Prof. Brian L. Evans. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin. 1. Introduction. Finite Impulse Response (FIR) model of transmission media. Analysis . Sparse Models. Michael Elad. The Computer Science Department. The Technion – Israel Institute of technology. Haifa 32000, Israel. . SPARS11 Workshop:. . . Signal . Processing with Adaptive . Origin, Definition, and Pursuit. Michael Elad. The Computer Science Department. The Technion – Israel Institute of technology. Haifa 32000, Israel. . *. *Joint . work with . Ron Rubinstein . Recovery. . (. Using . Sparse. . Matrices). Piotr. . Indyk. MIT. Heavy Hitters. Also called frequent elements and elephants. Define. HH. p. φ. . (. x. ) = { . i. : |x. i. | ≥ . φ. ||. x||. p. Tianzhu . Zhang. 1,2. , . Adel Bibi. 1. , . Bernard Ghanem. 1. 1. 2. Circulant. Primal . Formulation. 3. Dual Formulation. Fourier Domain. Time . Domain. Here, the inverse Fourier transform is for each . Sabareesh Ganapathy. Manav Garg. Prasanna. . Venkatesh. Srinivasan. Convolutional Neural Network. State of the art in Image classification. Terminology – Feature Maps, Weights. Layers - Convolution, . to Multiple Correspondence . Analysis. G. Saporta. 1. , . A. . . Bernard. 1,2. , . C. . . Guinot. 2,3. 1 . CNAM, Paris, France. 2 . CE.R.I.E.S., Neuilly sur Seine, France. 3 . Université. . François Rabelais. Molinaro. Santanu. . Dey. , Andres . Iroume. , . Qianyi. Wang. Georgia Tech. Better . approximation. of the integer hull. CuttinG. -planes. IN THEORY. Can use . any . cutting-plane. Putting all gives . Dileep Mardham. Introduction. Sparse Direct Solvers is a fundamental tool in scientific computing. Sparse factorization can be a challenge to accelerate using GPUs. GPUs(Graphics Processing Units) can be quite good for accelerating sparse direct solvers. Reading Group Presenter:. Zhen . Hu. Cognitive Radio Institute. Friday, October 08, 2010. Authors: Carlos M. . Carvalho. , Nicholas G. Polson and James G. Scott. Outline. Introduction. Robust Shrinkage of Sparse Signals. Afsaneh . Asaei. Joint work with: . Mohammad . Golbabaee. ,. Herve. Bourlard, . Volkan. . Cevher. φ. 21. φ. 52. s. 1. s. 2. s. 3. . s. 4. s. 5. x. 1. x. 2. φ. 11. φ. 42. 2. Speech . Separation Problem.