PPT-ECAL

engineering these are slides which were updated after the meeting 1 2 Summary of ECAL discussions by C Grefe In previous discussions it has been agreed that the inner radius of the ECAL should be 1500mm This fact alone results a significant cost reduction with respect to the ILD ECAL which starts at 1800mm. Rémi . Cornat. Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet. Ecole Polytechnique – . IN2P3/CNRS. On . behalf. of the . SiW. -ECAL ILD . project. *. w. ithin. CALICE coll.. 2. From this.... t. o this. . :. ECAL. nA. -- ~3 . mkA. HCAL, similar expected for ECAL), the magnitude of the LED difference does not depend on the PMT . position (Irina). . Jacques’ hypothesis: this can be rate effect, it is known to saturate at anode currents of 10-100 . Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan. 2011. 1. Overview. SPIROCA in . testbeam. 9.2010. (Jean-. Baptiste. ). Why change from . SPIROCA to VATA64?. VATA64 measurements. Plans for the electronics . There is a consensus that it is not possible to obtain a software (. π. 0. ) calibration with few days delay (this is to be verified, this is the major starting point). Then, the only way to control e.g. trigger rates is to use the LED system. sdf {dot} org http://decal.sdf.org A presentation by Derek Callaway ecal { at} s df {dot } org http://decal.sdf.org • Independent Digital Security Consultant • Web Application Penet 16/03/2011. 2. Integrator boards. NB. requires slight modification of CW bases: install 100 . nF. in series with 25 . Ω. . This does not affect the signal.. Recently, the integrators were upgraded: the 40 mezzanines were replaced with new ones.. Status . Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 18 Sep 2011. Trigger Rates. With L=3.5x10. 32. , . m. =1.4, 1380 bunches. Hadron (. E. T. >. 3.5 . GeV. and SPD<600): . 395 kHz. Electron (. E. T. >. 2.5 . Wesley H. Smith. U. Wisconsin – Madison. CMS Trigger Coordinator. Seminar, Texas A&M. April 20, 2011. Outline:. Introduction to CMS . Trigger Challenges & Architecture. Level -1 Trigger Implementation & Performance. Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) . -------------------------------------------------. 1. OUTLINE. Very short presentation of LLR, including our collaborations with Japan. Presentation of the CILEX –. Apolon. SLAC. Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27, 2011. 1. HPS Test Run Goals. Primary HPS Test Run Goals:. M. easure . Si sensor occupancies . 9 . Nov. 2018 (GMT . 313. ). To. 16:00 on . M. on 12 Nov. . 2018 (GMT . 316. ). AMS on ISS. Readout. Data Reduction. Detectors. POIC, MSFC. AMS CAN Bus. AMS. Laptop. Ku-band. S-band. Internet. AMSWire. Sergey . Boyarinov. Sep 25, 2017. N. otation. ECAL – old EC (electromagnetic calorimeter). PCAL – . preshower. calorimeter. DC – drift chamber. HTCC – high threshold . cherenkov. counter. FT – forward tagger. PARAMETERS. The . experimental apparatus includes two main detectors: a silicon vertex tracker (SVT) for . precise momentum vertex determination and . and an electromagnetic calorimeter (. ECal. ) to trigger on . Nabarun . Dev. 1. , Colin Jessop. 1. , Nancy Marinelli. 1. , Maurizio Pierini. 2. 08. /11/. 2017. 1 . University of Notre . Dame. 2. CERN. DQM-ML meeting. Outline. N.Dev, University of Notre Dame. DQM-ML Meeting, 08/11/17.