/
YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION

YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION - PowerPoint Presentation

faustina-dinatale
faustina-dinatale . @faustina-dinatale
Follow
398 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-17

YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION - PPT Presentation

HISTORY FEEDBACK COMMON ERRORS Structure of answers you can pick up marks by learning how to structure responses Eg agreedisagreeoverall Not describing what the source saysshows No own knowledge ID: 502844

sources source question knowledge source sources knowledge question structure refer cross agree surprised context reliable reference provenance details time violent wrong add

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMINATION

HISTORY FEEDBACKSlide2

COMMON ERRORS

Structure of answers – you can pick up marks by learning how to structure responses. E.g. agree/disagree/overall

Not describing what the source says/shows

No own knowledge

Not setting source in context of what was happening at the time

No cross-referencing – you can use other sources in paper to back up points you make (examiners like this)Slide3

Question 1: What is the Message of the source?

MAIN MESSAGE

: Youths were violent thugs that should be punished

(Be obvious – not ‘make things up’)

Evidence:

weapons/ outfit/ ridden over policeman/ empty bottles/ comments by youth saying they’re just bored and shouldn’t be punished

Context:

Clacton Riots of 1964 (also explained in Sources B and C) and other riots such as Margate (Source D)Slide4

Question 2: does B prove that C is wrong?

Structure:

B does prove C is wrong because –

B does not prove C is wrong because –

Overall:

Must include:

Details from the sources – what do BOTH say?

Provenance

(just because C is written by a historian at a much later date doesn’t make it less reliable – it actually makes it more reliable – would have used a range of sources and it not caught up in the panic or emotion of time)

Newspaper – there to sell papers

- sensationalised!

Own knowledge/context/cross reference with other sourcesSlide5

Question 3: Why was this photograph taken?

You need to explain using details in the picture, the date it was produced and use own knowledge/cross reference to other sources (e.g. Source B)

Lots of youths on the beach – causing trouble. One teen is throwing an object, there is rubbish everywhere and deck chairs knocked over.

Obviously taken to show how out of control and violent youths were – to sell newspapers, so to make money and to go with reports of violence like the report in source B.Slide6

Question 4: Are you surprised by this source?

Structure:

Yes I am surprised because:

No I’m not surprised because:

Overall –

Need to use details of what the source says: e.g. you should be surprised by the students having a peaceful silent protest – as the traditional view of the time were protests were violent. You shouldn’t be surprised by the fact there were protests as students protested about many things e.g. Vietnam, nuclear weapons

etc

Must refer to the provenance of the source and use own knowledge/cross-reference to other sources (e.g. Source G another peaceful protest (sit-in).Slide7

Question 5: Do you believe source F about students in the 1960s (use F and G in answer)

Many did not refer to source G at all!

Structure: yes I do because….. No I don’t because……… overall:

Need to refer to details in source, add own knowledge, refer to context and provenance and cross reference particularly with Source G but can use other sources where appropriate.

Please note

: just because source F was written later in a History book it doesn’t make it less reliable – a historian would have used a wide variety of evidence in research – newspaper articles at the time would have been exaggerated/sensationalised so are much less reliable!!Slide8

Question 6: Use ALL sources – ‘Young People in the 60s were out of control’ How far do you agree?

Structure:

Agree – young people were out of control: refer to sources: A,B and D add own knowledge to back it up and question these sources (newspaper articles/political cartoons and a photograph)

Disagree – young people were not out of control: refer to sources: C, E, F and G add own knowledge and comment on provenance of these perhaps more considered sources.

How far do you agree overall.

NEVER

: go through source by source.

ALWAYS

use the sources that agree together and those that disagree together.