Figure 1 Project Location Map - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Figure 1Project Location Map

Figure 2Watershed Location Map

Figure 3Topographic Map

Map Source:

Loinaz

(2005)

Approximate Blue Head

Ranch Property Line

Elevations (Ft above NAVD 1988

)

Figure 4

Property Location Map

Figure 5

Subbasins

in

Fisheating

Creek Watershed

Source:

Loinaz

(2005)

167.34 mi

246.35 mi220.45 mi27.64 mi2

4.73 mi2

42.24 mi24.35 mi2

6.44 mi

2

30.45 mi

2

50.52 mi

2

14.37 mi

2

19.31 mi

2

30.81 mi

2

Figure 6Key Subbasins

& Property

Upper

Fisheating

Creek

Fence Line

Drain

Joe Slough

Unnamed Drain

Carlton Ranch Run

Boothill

Creek

Central

Fisheating

Creek

Figure 7Subbasins contributing flow to Stream Gauges

Map Source:

Loinaz

(2005)

50.52 mi

2

30.81 mi

2

Contributing to

USGS 002255600

Upper

Fisheating

= 56 mi

2

Unnamed Drain = 4.35 mi

2

Sub-Total = 60.35 mi

2

Contributing to

FishV_O

Central

Fisheating

= 25 mi

2

Carlton Ranch Run = 6.44 mi

2

Sub-Total = 128.69 mi

2

Plus pass through = 189.04 mi

2

Fence Line Drain = 46.35 mi

2

Bootheel

Creek = 30.45 mi

2

Joe Slough = 20.45 mi

2

Contributing to

FishP

Lower

Fisheating

= 34 mi

2

Platt Branch = 14.37 mi

2

Sub-Total = 122.29 mi

2

Plus pass

through = 311.33 mi

2

Halpen

Marsh = 19.31 mi

2

Rainey Slough = 42.24 mi

2

Clay Slough = 4.73 mi

2

John Henry Slough = 7.64 mi

2

Contributing to

FishCR

Fisheating

Marsh = 51 mi

2

Gopher Gully= 30.81 mi

2

Sub-Total = 132.33 mi

2

Plus pass through = 433.66 mi

2

Gator Slough = 50.52 mi

2

13.92 %

43.59 %

71.79 %

100 %

Figure 8

Median and Mean Daily Flow per Area Values

Map Source:

Loinaz

(2005)

Contributing to

USGS 002255600

Sub-Total = 60.35 mi

2

Contributing to

FishV_O

Contributing to

FishP

Contributing to

FishCR

Med Q/Area = 0.0729

cfs

/mi

2

Median Q = 4.40

cfs

Mean Q = 53.07

cfs

Mean Q/Area = 0.8794

cfs

/mi

2

Sub-Total = 128.69 mi

2

Med Q/Area = 0.0979

cfs

/mi

2

Median Q = 12.60

cfs

Mean Q = 79.50

cfs

Mean Q/Area = 0.6178

cfs

/mi

2

Sub-Total = 122.29 mi

2

Med Q/Area = 0.1799

cfs

/mi

2

Median Q = 22.00

cfs

Mean Q = 121.99

cfs

Mean Q/Area = 0.9975

cfs

/mi

2

Sub-Total = 132.33 mi

2

Med Q/Area = 0.4232

cfs

/mi

2

Median Q = 56.00

cfs

Mean Q = 116.50

cfs

Mean Q/Area = 0.8804

cfs

/mi

2

Figure 9Key TP Water Quality Data

** TP annual loads represent likely maximum values for the watershed

Figure 10Key Model Hydrographs

Calibration Results at

FishV_O

, Simulated Flow

Calibration Results at

FishV_O

, Observed Flow

Figure 11Key Model Hydrographs

Calibration Results at

FishP

Calibration Results at

FishP

, Simulated Flow

Calibration Results at

FishP

, Observed Flow

Figure 12Key Model Hydrographs

Validation Results at

FishP

Validation Results at

FishP

, Simulated Flow

Validation Results at

FishP

, Observed Flow

Figure 13MODFLOW Model Domain

Not to Scale

Model Cells

Fisheating

Creek

Drain Cells

Constant Head

Boundary

Simulated

Recharge Basin

Figure 14

Alternative # 1

Alternative # 1

Fisheating

Creek

Map Sources: Blue Head Ranch & Cattle Company LLC and

Saunders Real Estate

Figure 15

Alternative # 1

Map Source: ESRI

Proposed 255 Acre footprint

With 225 Acres of treatment

Area using conventional STA

technology

Intake Pipe

Or Canal

Cell 2SAV

Cell 1

SAVOutletStructure andCanal

Not to Scale

Intake Pump

Station

Equalization Pool

Isolated Wetlands

Figure 16

Alternative # 2

Alternative # 2

Fisheating

Creek

Map Sources: Blue Head Ranch & Cattle Company LLC

Figure 17

Alternative # 2

Proposed 125 Acre

Footprint with ~ 100

Acre Treatment Area

Intake Pump

Station

Inlet Canal or

Pipeline

Not to Scale

Outlet Works

Equalization Pool

Map Sources: Blue Head Ranch & Cattle Company LLC

Figure 18

Alternative # 3

Alternative # 3

Fisheating

Creek

Map Sources: Blue Head Ranch & Cattle Company LLC and

Saunders Real Estate

Figure 19

Alternative # 3

Map Source: ESRI

Proposed 725 Acre footprint

With 500 Acres of treatment

Area using conventional STA

Technology and 200 Acres

Of Equalization Ponds for

Extended storage

Intake PipeOr Canal

Cell 2SAV

Cell 1SAVOutlet

Structure and

Canal

Not to Scale

Intake Pump

Station

Equalization Pool 1

Cell 3

SAV

Equalization Pool 2

Isolated Wetlands