Maintaining integrity including confidentiality and security in the peer review process is essential for Exchanging scientific opinions and evaluations without fear of reprisal Protecting trade secrets or other proprietary sensitive andor confidential information ID: 1040256
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Integrity and Confidentiality in NIH Pee..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1. Integrity and Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review Maintaining integrity- including confidentiality and security - in the peer review process is essential forExchanging scientific opinions and evaluations without fear of reprisal.Protecting trade secrets or other proprietary, sensitive and/or confidential information.Providing reliable input to the agency about research projects to support.Maintaining public trust in science.NIH takes maintaining confidentiality throughout the peer review process seriouslyStatement on Protecting the Integrity of U. S. Biomedical Research NOT-OD-14-073 (Maintaining Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review)NOT-OD-18-115 (Maintaining Integrity in NIH Peer Review: Responsibilities and Consequences) 1
2. Integrity and Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review By signing the NIH Confidentiality Certification, reviewers agree to comply with NIH confidentiality rules and not engage in the following prohibited actions with anyone who has not been officially designated to participate in the peer review process. Sharing applications or meeting materials. Granting access to any NIH secure computer system.Disclosing information to anyone, including a panel member who has a declared conflict of interest with that application, about the committee deliberations, discussions, evaluations, or documents.Using information contained in an application for his/her personal benefit or making such information available for the personal benefit of any other individual or organization. 2
3. Integrity and Confidentiality in NIH Peer Review Possible Consequences If the NIH determines that a situation involves a breach of integrity (including confidentiality and/or security) in the peer review process, the NIH in coordination with other offices may take action(s) including, but not limited to:Notifying the individuals and institutions involved. Terminating the reviewer’s service in peer review. Pursuing a referral for government-wide suspension or debarment. Referring the matter to the NIH Office of Management Assessment and possibly to the Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to determine if more serious consequences should be implemented.3
4. Conflict of InterestSituations that create conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest are described in the pre-meeting COI documents. Check for potential conflicts of interest (or appearances of conflicts) and alert the SRO immediately of any conflicts of which you are aware. A waiver is required for a conflicted reviewer to participate. During the meeting, if a reviewer has a conflict of interest with any application, the reviewer must leave the room during evaluation and scoring of that application. In signing the post-review certification, each reviewer certifies that he/she did not participate in an evaluation of any applications with which he/she knowingly had a conflict of interest. 4
5. Conflict of Interest (COI)Contact us immediately if you discover a new potential conflict of interest.5
6. Unconscious Bias in Peer ReviewUnconscious bias: an implicit attitude, stereotype, motivation or assumption that can occur without one’s knowledge, control or intentioneven the most well-intentioned people experience some degree of unconscious biasTypes of bias that can impact peer review include: False correlationsConfirmation biasIn-group preferences Racial/ethnic biasGender/sexual orientation biasInstitutional biasAge biasCultural preconceptionsGeographic preconceptionsLanguage presumptions6
7. Mitigating unconscious bias in peer reviewGreater awareness and educational interventions are effective in reducing bias and lead to an improved review process.Tips for minimizing the influence of bias and assumptionsLearn about unconscious bias and its impact on peer review and use the additional resources in next slide (follow the hyperlinks and review related chapter in the “Reviewer Manual” in “Meeting Materials” folder of IAR).Periodically evaluate your judgments and consider whether unconscious biases may influence your decisions.Spend sufficient time evaluating each application.Maintain your standard and apply the criteria consistently to all applications throughout the review process. Evaluate each individual’s entire application. Don't rely too heavily on only one element of the application to evaluate an applicant.7Unconscious Bias in Peer Review
8. 8Unconscious Bias in Peer ReviewAdditional ResourcesUnconscious bias (Office of the Director Scientific Workforce Division/NIH)NIH Peer Review Overview (Office of Extramural Research/NIH) Research Integrity (Office of Extramural Research/NIH) Minimizing Bias in Peer Review (“Reviewer Manual”, IAR)