Language learning strategies - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Language learning strategies as a complex dynamic phenomenon

Carol Griffithscarolgriffiths5@gmail.comwww.carolgriffiths.net

1

Slide2

StrategiesWhen the good language learner was first introduced to the language learning literature by Rubin (1975), it was optimistically anticipated that knowledge of strategies would be enough to empower all students to learn language successfully. 2

Slide3

StrategiesThe term “strategy” is derived from warfareAlthough some find the aggressive derivation unfortunate,

others find likening the learning of language to a

battle quite appropriate

3

Slide4

Strategies: definitionStrategies have four essential characteristicsThey are activeThey are chosen, either deliberately or automatically

They are goal-orientedThey are for learning or regulating learningA full definition would therefore be:LLS are actions chosen (either deliberately or automatically)

for the purpose of learning or regulating the learning of language4

Slide5

Strategy useThere are studies which show that frequency of strategy use is positively correlated with successful learningSuccessful learners have also been shown to use many more strategies than unsuccessful learnersSuccessful learners know how to orchestrate their strategy repertoires

5

Slide6

ComplexityStrategies, however, do not exist in a vacuum. In fact, strategy use is mediated by a complex amalgamation of a vast and complicated network of other variables, such as

contextual factors the learning target the learner’s own individual

characteristics each of these variables interacts like cogs in a wheel, and each one affects how the others behave, and is in constant motion.

6

Slide7

ContextAmong others, Norton and Toohey (2001) stress the need to view language learning as a situated experience. This may include

the learning environment (e.g. classroom, distance, study abroad etc.) all

the other factors in the background of the learner’s life (e.g. family, job, classmates/colleagues, culture, etc.). All of these variables will impact on the strategies that a learner wishes or is able to employ and the extent to which self-regulation will be successful or even possible.7

Slide8

TargetNot all learners will be aiming at the same target. Some

learners may wish to expand their vocabulary, others to improve their grammar, their pronunciation, their pragmatic competence or their language skills. Yet others may study English for some specific purpose (ESP), for instance to pursue an academic goal (EAP), to pass an exam (e.g. IELTS or TOEFL) or, perhaps, some goal such as business, teaching or tourism.

Or the language may be integrated into a course which focuses on some particular content (CLIL, e.g. medicine, or law). It would be reasonable to expect that the strategies required for these varied purposes would not be identical.

8

Slide9

Individual characteristicsStrategy selection is also determined in part by individual learner characteristics, of which there is a dauntingly large

number (e.g. Pawlak, 2012). Of these individual variables, perhaps the most important is motivation

Motivation is necessary if learners are to be prepared to invest the time and effort required to develop linguistic capital In turn, investment may depend on learners’ beliefs

, of which

positive beliefs about themselves

as language learners and

about the language they are trying to learn

seem to be the most important

In

addition, it would seem that good language learners also have the ability to

autonomously

take control of their own

learning

9

Slide10

Individual characteristicsHowever, although there is reasonably widespread agreement over the importance of motivation, investment, beliefs and autonomy there is less

consensus over the role of various other individual differences such as age gender

personality learning styleaffect.

10

Slide11

ComplexityThe literature, then would seem to suggest that GLLsare motivatedthey

therefore invest considerable time and effort in their learningthey have positive beliefs about themselves and about the language they are trying to learn

they are autonomousthey frequently use and carefully orchestrate a large repertoire of language learning strategies They choose their strategies to

suit their situation, their target and their own individual characteristics

.

11

Slide12

Research questionThe research question therefore is: which of these factors is most salient?

12

Slide13

The study: participantsThe participants in this study were 14 successful learners of English. All of the respondents were personally known to the researcher who was therefore able to confirm that they were all able to communicate effectively in English

both orally and graphically using generally appropriate vocabulary and accurate grammar, though there may have been the occasional “slip”. They were all non-native speakers of English either teaching English or in English at tertiary level, and either working for or already holding post-graduate degrees.

Nine of the respondents were women and five were menIn order to help minimise cultural bias they were deliberately chosen to represent a variety of national backgrounds. 13

Slide14

The study: participants

No.Name

GenderNationality

1

Liz

F

Turkish

2

Tina

F

Russian

3

Lana

F

Czech

4

Hanu

M

Indian

5

Lee

F

Korean

6

Hong

F

Chinese

7

Yasu

M

Japanese

8

Aziz

M

Iranian

9

Rose

F

Kyrgys

10

Ana

F

Pakistan

11

Kris

M

Polish

12

HamedMKenyan13MariaFBrazilian14HanaFFinnish

14

Slide15

The study: instrumentA Likert scale was constructed using the findings from the literature review regarding the importance of motivation, investment, beliefs, autonomy and strategy use. Strategy use was further differentiated according to number, frequency, orchestration, target, context, and individual characteristics.

Respondents were asked to respond on a scale of 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree) to a series of statements on which they were also asked to comment  

15

Slide16

The study: instrumentNo

When learning EnglishRating/comment1I was motivated

2I spent a lot of time working on my English3I put a lot of effort into my English studies

4

I used many strategies

5

I used strategies frequently

6

I chose my strategies so that they worked well together

7

I chose strategies to suit my individual needs

8

I chose strategies to suit my learning goal

9

I chose strategies to suit my learning situation

10

I took charge of my own learning

11

I believe I am a good language learner

12

I believe English is a good language to learn

16

Slide17

The study: data collection & analysisThe questionnaire was sent out by e-mail and returned by respondents at their convenience. The questionnaire data were analysed for reliability and medians The comments were examined for clarification

and further insights regarding the ratings. Some of the comments were quite brief, but others were very detailed and contained interesting insights about the participants’ journeys towards becoming good language learners. Comments were selected according to the extent to which they added insight to the research question, and also in an attempt to give every participant an opportunity to have his/her voice heard at some stage.

An independent colleague checked the reported comments for accuracy. 17

Slide18

Quantitative resultsThe Alpha co-efficient for reliability for the questionnaire was .720. Given the relatively low numbers of respondents in the study, this was considered a good result, and suggests that the instrument is reliable and that it can be used as a basis for valid conclusionsAll

respondents gave median ratings in the agree to strongly agree range for all items of the questionnaire, with only one exception (Item 6, regarding strategy orchestration. In other words, the responses to by far the majority of the items (11 out of the 12 or 92%) were on the positive side of the scale, while the remaining item was in the neutral range.

18

Slide19

Quantitative resultsWith only one exception (respondent 14), all respondents strongly agreed that they were motivated (Item 1), producing a maximum median rating of 5.0. Also highly rated with medians of 5 was matching strategies to goals (Item 8), taking charge of one’s own learning (Item 10), and the belief that English is a good language to learn (Item 12).

The investment of time and effort (Items 2 and 3) both received median ratings of 4.5The belief in self as a good language learner (Item 11) was rated 4 along with the frequent choice of many strategies to suit individual needs and situations (Items 4, 5, 7 and 9).

The choice of strategies so that they worked well together (Item 6) was rated lowest (median = 3). 19

Slide20

Quantitative Results

NumberItemMedian rating1

Motivation58Strategies chosen to suit goal5

10

Autonomy

5

12

Belief in English as a good language to learn

5

2

Investment of time

4.5

3

Investment of effort

4.5

4

Use of many strategies

4

5

Frequent use of strategies

4

7

Strategies chosen for individual needs

4

9

Strategies chosen to suit situation

4

11

Belief in self as a good language

learner

4

6

Orchestration

3

20

Slide21

Qualitative results: motivation (median=5)“If I learn a foreign language I will be able to communicate with others and understand the world better” (Liz - integrative)“Job, social status…undertake higher studies, to maintain friendships etc” (Hanu

- instrumdental) “I like English, especially the sound of English. Also, I wanted to use English well since I majored in English (People expect English majors to use English at near-native level)” (Lee – intrinsic/extrinsic)“I thought learning English will give me more opportunities, will open the door to the world” (

Rose - instrumental)21

Slide22

Qualitative results: motivationYasu provides a lengthy and thoughtful comment regarding what motivated him, including some negative motivational factors:Some

people probably feared being proficient in English due to a self-defence mechanism (a fear of failure or a fear of losing one’s identity)Others are self-consciousness (this is especially true in regards to Japanese teachers of English who have historically avoided developing proficiency. “He is not good at English because he speaks it” is how they typically ridiculed those who did learn to speak English).

I did not suffer from this crab mentality. Although I’ve experienced periods of English-related apathy, on average, I was highly motivated to learn English.22

Slide23

Qualitative results: goal-orientation (median=5)“to be a member of a multicultural and multilingual world” (Liz) “to achieve accuracy and

fluency and sound like a native speaker” (Tina) “higher studies, job, dating/social” (Hanu)“to understand a new/different culture” (Ana).

“My learning goal was to improve the four skills of English so that I was confident in communicating with others and to pass the TEM-4 and TEM-8 exam”. (Hong)“The goal was to be able to understand as much of written and spoken language as I possibly could. At first I was working towards being able to read without checking any vocabulary, but soon realized that it was a utopian scheme,

even

for native speakers

!” (Kris)

23

Slide24

Qualitative: autonomy (median=5)Hong reports that “I had good self-control” and learnt “without teachers’ urging”. Yasu comments that when he took charge of his own learning it “made a tremendous difference”.

Kris agrees that he took charge of his own learning “with the proviso that I never questioned my teachers’ decisions or balked at activities which they assigned me [but] I decided to work over and above what I was given”. Hana sums up her response in one word: “Absolutely” Ana is equally emphatic “Absolutely yes”.

24

Slide25

Qualitative: English is a good language to learn (median=5)According to Hong, the grammar, pronunciation and structure are easier than Chinese (her native language) Hamed

: “It is, of course, now the dominant intellectual language of the era, just as Latin and Arabic had been, and ancient Greek had been in its time”. Ana finds the language aesthetically pleasing: “it’s a beautiful language to learn, to write in and to use in day to day routine”. Kris is more pragmatic: “For better or worse, given the geopolitical situation, knowing English is necessary.

Hana’s reasons also tend towards the practical: “English is a good language to learn, because it is “the” lingua franca, but also because it is an easy language for a beginner to learn.”25

Slide26

Qualitative: investment of time (median=4.5)“Yes, I consulted dictionaries and grammar books, and spent a lot of time doing assignments and reading recommended and supplementary materials” (Aziz).

Hong gives quite a detailed answer: “Students at my time usually got up at 6 am and did morning readings and listened to [news in English] at 7 am everyday. We spent our time mostly in the library for some self-study, by which I guess we learned more from the teachers in class. We also went to the English Corner on campus every Thurs. evening to meet different people and improve our speaking

skills.” And Yasu explains: “In an EFL environment, becoming proficient in English is generally more time consuming”.Hana, however, confesses: “I rarely studied at home for school”.

Lee is another who

explains

: “To be honest, I haven’t spent much time nor made a great effort to improve my

English”

.

26

Slide27

Qualitative: investment of effort (median=4.5)Hong: “I regarded learning English as my utmost goal and dedicated myself to it”. “I was diligent at what I was doing and gave much attention” (Tina).

Hamed explains that his effort included “reading extensively in different areas”. But Hana disagrees: “The only time I remember having been putting effort into studying was one afternoon when I practiced to memorize 4-5 pages of King Lear verbatim. The extract may have been an “easified” reader, but it contained lots of language that was unknown and difficult to understand for a 14-year-old who had studied English for 3 years (actually 2.5)”

27

Slide28

Qualitative: belief in oneself (median=4)For Lee, this belief was fostered “because I got many rewards from English (e.g. high scores, teachers’ praises etc.)”Aziz also includes positive teacher feedback among the reasons for his positive beliefs.

Hamed credits environmental factors: “Kenya is a multicultural society with 42 languages. The majority of the people are trilingual, other even more”.

Tina, believes she is a good learner but is self-critical: “I could have done better if I had been more proactive and not afraid of making mistakes”.Kris is also

positive,

but self-critical:

“I’m

not as pleased with my achievement as I thought I’d be, but that’s probably due to realizing that there’s always space for improvement”.

Hong

is

uncertain:

“I don't know the

criterior

to judge whether I am a good language learner or not. But

I

have no problem

communicating

with foreigners and solving real-life problems in English”.

Hanu

, however, appears to have no self

doubts: he

considers himself to be “as good as a native speaker”.

28

Slide29

Qualitative: quantity (median=4)There were numerous responses to this item, including:“cognitive” (Liz); “memory” (Yasu

) “drilling; talking to a native speaker; watching English films” (Lana)“using dictionary…..watching TV” (Hanu) “I revised, read, tried to talk to colleagues, did exercises, tried to risk and look for words and resources” (Maria)

“I just read a lot” (Hamed); “I read extracurricular materials” (Kris)“extensive reading, using dictionaries and other references” (Aziz)“I wrote down all the new words from every book I read” (Rose)“I planned what to study and monitored my progress” (Lee)

29

Slide30

Qualitative: frequency (median=4)Hana: “I think trying out the language in my head was something I did continuously”.Lee provides some examples: “I guess I used several other strategies when reading English often, like predicting, skimming, and summarizing”.And Hong explains” “I tried to use

strategies often and made reflections on how effective the strategies I used were on learning so that I could adjusted my strategies timely”.But Yasu comments: “I’m not certain the frequency was vast”.

30

Slide31

Qualitative: situation (median=4)A variety of situations is noted, including precise locations, such as “Istanbul University” (Liz), while others focus on the characteristics of their situations, many of which were less than ideal:“being taught by non-native English speakers” (Tina)

“I had to study in a room where many students study together” (Lee)“my high school teacher never pronounced correctly, so that I went through a very hard time on correcting my own mispronunciations” (Hong)“I was not exposed to authentic English” (Yasu

)“I started during the Communist regime. Therefore the learning situation was quite difficult, e.g. to talk to a native speaker or buy an English Book” (Lana)31

Slide32

Qualitative: individual needs (median=4)Lee considers her strategies in relation to her learning style: “I guess I understood my learning styles when I was a high school student, so I used the strategies fit for my styles (e.g., step by step, detail oriented, auditory, and so on)”.Individual learning style is also considered by Yasu

: “Because I am a visual learner, I often use texts, tables and charts. I was not good at hands-on classroom activities, but I tried expanding my range. I am not sociable and I have trouble asking for help although I try to do so intentionally”. Others did not consider individual needs important: “I only chose strategies that were useful for my English learning without considering my individual needs” (Hong).

32

Slide33

Qualitative: orchestration (median=3)The item on combining strategies did not attract much comment and was given the lowest median rating (=3). Yasu, however, comments that in the beginning “I did not pay attention to the effective combination of strategies. I could only hope that a relatively decent combination of strategies was chosen by Buddha…..After I became familiar with the strategies…..I may have tried more than was necessary”.

This comment underlines an important point: that strategy orchestration does not always come easily, but may require trial and error to get it right.

33

Slide34

DynamicsIn addition to learner complexity, we must consider that these attributes may not remain stable. Variability is evident in several of the responses: According to Yasu

, “My goals changed during the course of my English studies. Prior to entering the university, preparing for entrance exams was the most important objective. After entering the university, developing proficiency was the goal”. Kris talks about his changing perspective on strategy orchestration: “I don’t think I considered how the strategies worked vis a vis one another – not until I myself became a teacher at least”.

34

Slide35

DynamicsLee attributes her willingness to invest time directly to her situation: “I studied English in a private language institute before going to the States, but I didn’t like it. It was while studying in the States that I spent the most time working on my English”. And change is implied in Ana’s description of language learning as “liberating…..[since] learning of a new language exposes one to a trans-cultural experience, opening vistas to experience things in life with a different cultural context, thereby releasing one from one particular cultural fixity/limitation”.

35

Slide36

ImplicationsSince strategy use is a common feature of good language learners, it would seem to make sense for teachers to encourage learners to expand their strategy repertoires and to use these repertoires frequently and appropriately. Although there are those who question the value of strategy instruction (for instance Rees-Miller, 1993), there are others (for instance

Chamot, 2005; Cohen, 2011) who can point to successful efforts to teach strategies. Since language learning strategies have the potential to be such a “powerful learning tool” (O’Malley et al. 1985, p.43), learners should surely at least be exposed to strategy possibilities so that they can make up their own minds about which ones are useful for their own individual characteristics, situations and goals.

36

Slide37

ImplicationsSince motivation is a major factor related to good language learning, it would seem only common sense to suggest that teachers need to attend to the motivational levels of their learners so that they will be willing to invest the time and effort which is required for success. One way of promoting motivation may well be to respect learners’ autonomy, which is another recurring theme as a characteristic of successful language learners

. Learner beliefs should also be reinforced. Especially important may be the belief that what they are trying to do is worth doing and that they are able to do it.

37

Slide38

Questions for ongoing researchThe current study spread the net widely in order to obtain a broad picture. It would also be useful to take a more in-depth look at successful language learners in specific locations. The criterion for “successful” in this study is relatively imprecise. A more exact definition of “good language learner” might be helpful, perhaps using standardised test results (such as TOEFL, IELTS or FCE) as a proficiency criterion.

Although it was possible to infer some dynamic aspects of good language learner development from this cross-sectional study, this perspective might be more effectively surveyed by means of a longitudinal research design38

Slide39

ConclusionsA learner is not just a repertoire of strategies, an embodiment of various characteristics, a learner of some linguistic target, or an inhabitant of a particular environment.

Every learner is the sum of all possible variables, the permutations of which are more-or-less infinite, and it is important that they are viewed holistically and the complexities and dynamics borne constantly in mind.

39

Slide40

ConclusionsNevertheless, we can conclude that good language learners:frequently use and carefully orchestrate many

strategiesinvest a great deal of time and effort. are goal-oriented

are able to adapt to a range of contextual variables according to their individual needsdisplay motivation, autonomy and positive beliefs. Therefore, it would seem that these are the qualities we should be especially aiming to develop in our students.

40

Slide41

Please contact me if you would like any further information

Carol Griffithscarolgriffiths5@gmail.comwww.carolgriffiths.net

41