Relationship Between The Courts and Parliament in Law Making Five Main Features of the Relationship Between Parliament and the Courts The supremacy of parliament The ability of courts to influence parliament ID: 762493
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Relationship Between The Courts and Par..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Relationship Between The Courts and Parliament in Law Making
Five Main Features of the Relationship Between Parliament and the Courts The supremacy of parliament The ability of courts to influence parliament The interpretation of statutes by courts The codification of common law The abrogation of common law
The supremacy of Parliament Can make and change law within its constitutional power. Has the ability to pass legislation to either confirm or override (abrogate) decisions made through the courts (with the exception of the high court on constitutional matters.) Responsible for passing legislation that establishes the courts and states the power they have to hear cases. Can also pass legislation to alter the jurisdiction of courts eg Magistrates Act amended to create specialist list (sexual offences list) and divisions (Koori Court, Drug Court and Family Violence Court) X Separation of Powers – must ensure courts remain independent and retains the power to determine if Parliament has made laws beyond its law-making authority.
The Ability of Courts to Influence Parliament Judges can make comments when handing down judgement in ratio decidendi or obiter dictum that inspire parliament to initiate law reform. Parliament can also be influenced to change law If court bound by previous precedent but decision creates injustice Court acts with judicial conservatism ( eg Trigwell ) Court acts with judicial activism ( eg Mabo) Courts decision may highlight an issue or lead to public uproar ( eg abortion law)
The Interpretation of Statutes by Courts For legislation to be effective the courts must apply legislations to the cases that come before them. To do this courts must sometimes interpret the meaning to the words of phrases of the Act.
Codification vc Abrogation Codification Parliament may decide to bring common law principles within statute law. This means that the common law is restated in Acts and becomes statute law. Abrogation Parliament may abolish common law principles it disagrees with.
Summary Where statute law and common law conflict, statute law prevails. This is because parliament is the supreme law-making authority . Courts give meaning to the terms used in Acts in order to apply them to specific cases. The decisions made by courts about the meaning of terms used in an Act form a precedent for future cases. Parliament may legislate to abrogate or codify the decisions made by a court.