PPT-The Companies ACT,1956

BY Jai Rane Introduction The Indian companies act like most of our laws has been farmed on the lines of the common law In the year 1850 the joint company act was passed This was first Indian legislation Following this the Indian companies act1913 was passed The act aimed at improvising the earlier law to meet the requirement of the then prevailing world This act was replaced by the act of 1956. as per Companies Act, 1956 maintained at Company Secretariat of MCL Sl. No. Description of matter 1. Register of investments 2. Copy of every instrument creating any charge requiring registration Security . Policies. Piotr. (Peter) . Mardziel. , . Stephen Magill, Michael . Hicks, . and . Mudhakar. . Srivatsa. Your information. 2. Bad + Good. 3. Want. Protect personal information.. Preserve beneficial uses.. Presentation . By. CA Anil Sharma. Share Capital and Debentures. Chapter IV. Sections 43 to 72. the . Companies (. Share Capital and Debentures. ) Rules, 2014. . All sections are effective from 1.4.2014 except Section 57 which was effective from 12.9.2013 and section 66 which is not yet effective.). PROVIDED FURTHER that in the case of a rule applicable only to a family it has not been discontinued by the family; (e) "full blood", "half blood" and "uterine blood"- (i) t STRUCTURE OF COMPANIES ACT,2013. :. 658 SECTIONS OF 1956 ACT Vs 470 sections. 7 schedules ( 15 schedules in 1956 Act). 29 chapters. Rule based act therefore not Complete code. 348 SECTIONS ,WHREIN RULES TO BE FRAMED SEPERATELY. L. esson 2. Starter. Read your paragraphs on . sherif. Sherif. G. R. A. V. E. Asch (1956). Ash thought . Sherif’s. findings were due to the . ambiguity. of the . situation. What would happen if participants were exposed to social influence in a group situation where there is no doubt about the correct answer (unambiguous situation. C)Book:Smith,A.,Smith,B.&Smith,C.(2001)TitleofBook.Publishernameandlocation,xyzpp.D)InternetresourcesAuthor(2002)Titleofwebsite,databaseorotherre-sources,Publishernameandlocation(ifindicated),numberof Theproblemofprosopagnosiaamplitudealternatedwithsharpwavesandrunsoflowfrequencybetarhythm.Thedisorganizationwasparticularlyevidentinthecorticalleads.Reactivityonphoticstimulationwasadequate.Thepicture 358MICHAELATKINSON,MARGARETG.HAPPEY,ANDFRANCISG.SMIDDYbyinjectingafewmillilitresofsalineandslowlyadvanced6-8cm.,exertingconstantsuctionwiththesyringe.Itisthenclearedagainbyinjectingsalineandslowlywith CaseReportsCase1,afemaleaged47years,firstseenonJuly28,1956,developedophthalnoplegiaontheleftsidefollowingsubarachnoidhaemorrhageduetoasuddenriseinbloodpressureinJanuary,1956.Sincethentherehadbeenaprog 956OCT.26,1957ALDOSTERONESECRETIONINMANtime,inbothmanandexperimentalanimals,thatsupple-mentarysodiumchloridecombinedwithrestrictionofpotassiumintakeintensifiedtheundesirableside-effectsofthesalt-retai 1956 –. Revised requirements for the Stock Exchanges and Listed Companies. . 2. Existing Regulatory Framework. Companies Act, 1956 – [Sec 391-394]. Listing Agreement. FEMA . Accounting Standards . –. . Revised requirements for the Stock Exchanges and Listed . Companies. . 1. N. ARCHANA SASTRY. STOCK EXCHANGE & SEBI VIS-À-VIS - CHANGES INTRODUCED IN THE EXISTING PROCEDURES. APPLICABILITY. . . . . P C Agrawal . . . B.Com. ., LL.B., CAIIB, FCS. cs.pcagrawal@gmail.com. . 20/2/2014 Download Source- . www.taxguru.in. . Contents. MCA Notification dated 12.9.2013.