/
1  Private  for  Profit Actors 1  Private  for  Profit Actors

1 Private for Profit Actors - PowerPoint Presentation

groundstimulus
groundstimulus . @groundstimulus
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-15

1 Private for Profit Actors - PPT Presentation

Working for the right to health The logic of regulation under the right to health Rachel Hammonds WHO 21 May 2015 2 Proposition Private provision of health services does not change the ID: 777814

rights health human private health rights private human sector provision state services governments privatization protect obligations states framework requires

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "1 Private for Profit Actors" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

Private for Profit Actors Working for the right to health? The logic of regulation under the right to health

Rachel Hammonds

WHO, 21 May 2015

Slide2

2

PropositionPrivate provision of health services does not change the role of the state as the ultimate guarantor of the realization of the right to health but makes it more difficult for a state to fulfill its obligations to realize the right to health.

Slide3

3

Increasing private provision of health care“Private provision is a substantial and growing sector that is capturing an increasing share of the health market across the world.”WHO, World Health Report, 2010

Slide4

4

Increasing private provision of health careProgress towards universal health coverage in BRICS: translating economic growth into better healthKrishna D Rao, Varduhi Petrosyan, Edson Correia Araujo & Diane McIntyre Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2014;92:429-435.

The health sector of many low- and

middle-income countries is characterized

by mixed health systems in which both the public and private sectors provide

health

services

.”

Slide5

5

Increasing private provision of health careNeoliberal arguments -reduce role of the state-reduce taxation to increase investment-greater efficiency of private sector = lower prices-choice for consumers

-improve quality

-expand coverage

Slide6

Strength of government commitment to protecting access to health services (Canada)Type of health system (see Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen – Kerala vs N India)Degree of privatization (US vs UK)Capacity and willingness of State to regulate (accountability) to ensure equitable access (cost as a barrier)

Impact of private sector provision - Context6

Slide7

7

1948: UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human RightsBy 48 - 0 with 8 abstentions (Eastern bloc, Saudi Arabia and S Africa)

Legal Protection of International Human Rights

Slide8

8

Article 12

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the

right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health

Slide9

9

Slide10

The right to health – human rights principles

10

Slide11

11

What does the human rights framework do?Provides a legal framework with standards telling us about the obligations of States Parties:What Governments can not do to us (respect)

What Governments must stop others from doing to us

(protect)

What Governments must do for us over time – ESC progressive realization and core obligations

(fulfill)

Slide12

12

How should health care services be delivered?The Committee notes that the undertaking “to take steps ... by all appropriate means including particularly the adoption of legislative measures” neither requires nor precludes any particular form of government or economic system being used as the vehicle for the steps in question, provided only that it is democratic and that all human rights

are thereby

respected….

Committee on ESC Rights, General

Comment No. 3 (1991)

Slide13

13

How should health care services be delivered?“Thus, in terms of political and economic systems the Covenant is neutral and its principles cannot accurately be described as being predicated exclusively upon the need for, or the desirability of a socialist or a capitalist system, or a mixed, centrally planned, or laissez‑faire economy, or upon any other particular approach.”

Committee on ESC Rights, General

Comment No. 3 (1991)

Slide14

14

What is the impact of privatization?It expands the human rights obligations of the state to protect its inhabitants from infringements of human rights by private health providers. This requires that states assume a more complex regulatory role. Change in power

dynamics

requires

vigilance across all policy areas including

taxation, intellectual property.Lancet-Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health (2014)

Slide15

15

What does privatization require of governments?“Governments need to be able to analyze market conditions, set policy frameworks, draw up, negotiate and enforce contracts, regulate monopolies, coordinate finance and support producers, enable community provision and provide consumers with information on their options and remedies.”Privatization of Public Sector Activities, 1999, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs

Slide16

16

What does the human rights framework require?“Whether publicly or privately provided, health care services must be affordable to all.” (para 12b.iii)

States Parties have the obligation to protect the right to health by ensuring that privatization of the health sector does not

impact on the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality

of health facilities.” ( para 35)

General Comment 14

Slide17

17

What does the human rights framework require?De Jure role of the State includes the obligation to respect the right to health by:Effective regulation - of public and private providersEffective

monitoring

which

requires

functioning health information systems, civil registration systems and disaggregated data. Effective accountability of health professionals, institutions, the health system, private sector actors (respect the right to health), IFIs (World Bank, IMF)

and

donors.

Slide18

18

Case law - Preventable Maternal MortalityAlyne da Silva Pimentel Teixeira (deceased) v. Brazil, 2011

The Committee found that Brazil directly responsible for the failure to monitor private institutions when medical services were outsourced to such institutions.” (

failure to protect

)

The Committee condemned the government for denying not just Alyne’s rights, but also those of all Brazilian women by its failure to address the systemic health care factors that lead to maternal death. (

failure to respect, fulfill

)

Slide19

19

Technical guidance on preventable maternal morbidity and mortality22… States are responsible for exercising due diligence, or acting with a certain standard of care, to ensure that non-governmental actors, including private service providers, insurance and pharmaceutical companies, and manufacturers of health-related goods and equipment, as well as community and family members, comply with certain

standards.

States

may be held responsible for private acts if they fail to act with due diligence to prevent, investigate and punish violations of

rights.United Nations Human Rights Council 2012 A/HRC/21/22

Slide20

OPERA Framework – Center for Economic, Social

and Cultural Rights20

Slide21

Neoliberal policies that encourage privatization and the resulting down-sized state are in conflict with the increased role of the state in regulation.“The smaller, weaker and less resourced governments fashioned by neoliberal policies are less able to implement their human

rights obligations to protect their members from abuses by third party institutions and actors or to effectively regulate private sector health institutions.” Audrey Chapman, The Impact of Reliance on Private Sector Health Services on the Right to Health: Health and Human Rights Journal, 2014, 16/1.Tension

21

Slide22

Accountability human rights obligations apply to governments not private actorsGuiding Principles on Business and Human Rights- “Ruggie Framework” (respect, protect and remedy)

Extra challenges in a mixed system22

Slide23

Access and equity versus profit - TRIPS“The experiences of South Africa, Thailand, and India provide examples of difficulties countries have had to overcome to implement TRIPS flexibilities. Although they were

successful in their attempts, there is fear that pressure from developed countries and pharmaceuticalcompanies will thwart future actions.”UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Anand Grover, 31 March 2009, A/HRC/11/12, Extra challenges in a mixed system

23

Slide24

24

Additional challenges of private provision for advancing the right to health How to divide responsibility for respecting, protecting and fulfilling the right to health between multiple duty

bearers?

national

government (primary)

countries in a position to assistdomestic and multinational corporations (Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights- Ruggie Framework)international actors (e.g. World Bank, Global Fund, GAVI Alliance)

Slide25

25

Conclusions

Advancing

the

right to health

requires: