The way you describe complexity all my cases are like that Håvard Aaslund MA Institute of social work and family therapy Håvard Aaslund 1 Outline of the presentation ID: 785831
Download The PPT/PDF document "Supervision and Complexity in Child Welf..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Supervision and Complexity in Child Welfare Social Work
- The way you describe complexity – all my cases are like thatHåvard Aaslund (M.A.)Institute of social work and family therapy
Håvard Aaslund
1
Slide2Outline of
the presentationBackground for the prjoectComplexity
as a theme in child welfare
social
workTheoretical frameworkMethodFindingsAnalysis and feedback
PRESENTATION TITLE
2
Slide3Background
A post-graduate course in child welfare supervisionInitiated
to give newly educated
social
workers supervision when entering the field
of child
welfare
Backgroud in a white paper about competence in child welfare services of NorwayChild welfare work is seen as one of the most complex areas of social work and welfare services in general (Bakken et al 20014)Still complexity is seldom a theme in literature about supervision
PRESENTATION TITLE
3
Slide4The conception complex situations in practice can be described as situations where:
roles are unclear and/or newdifferent professions, disciplines or agencies are cooperatingforms of understanding and theoretical paradigms collideconflict and discord occurhelp is supposed to assist families in conflict
theoretical knowledge does not sufficeskills are not learnedsociety interferes with assessment of a specific caseethical dilemmas and problems are not addressed
(Vråle 2014)
4
Slide5Increased complexity in the child welfare service
From control to welfareHigher demands
on evidenceMore individual
rights
Higher prevalence of psychological problemsHigher
values of
user-participation
More
resistant attidudes towards intervening in the private sphereFrom a principle of biology to a focus on attchment theoryThe best for the children (ethics of conviction vs ethics of responsibility)Increased complexity in childhood (Vetlesen 2012)
5
Slide6Complicating
factors in the organization‘Native tongues’, habitus, supervision
Beuraucratic written communication
Power
balance
between agencies and professionsDoxa – what is
taken for grantedIndividuell tilpasning
vs
samordning
(Willumsen 2009, Aamodt 2012)FOREDRAGETS TITTEL6
Slide7Supervision in child
welfare servicesLack of supervision can lead to
overidentifation in practice or failure to do
appropriate
action(Burns
2009, Chiller og Crisp 2012, Ellet og Millar 2004).A lot of child
welfare workers
will
experience compassion fatigue or burnout in their working life. Qualified supervision is found to be the most important factor for staying in the profession (Burns 2009, Chiller og Crisp 2012, Cicero-Reese og Black 1998, Ellet m.fl. 2006, Zlotnik m.fl. 2005, McFadden m.fl. 2013).Still our experience from the students and a resent master thesis suggest that
there is a lack
of
supervision
amongst
norwegian
child
welfare
workers
.
PRESENTATION TITLE
7
Slide8Child welfare
context (Ellet et al 2007)PRESENTATION TITLE
8
Slide9The
professional development of the helper (Rønnestad 1985)
9
Development ----------------------------
Stagnation
(increased anxiety
)
5.Integration/
realism
4 Exploring hope3. Confusion/ depression Pseudo-development Premature closing/defensitivity2. Counsciousness of complexity1.Confirmation and enthusiasm
Slide10Supervising skills in complex cases
Active listening Containing and withstandingSorting and tidyingNaming and framing(Vråle 2014)FOREDRAGETS TITTEL
10
Slide11Research method
A qualitative, fenomenological and hermenutic approachA cooperation
between practice,
education
and
researchStrategical sample of experienced child welfare
workersTwo
researchers
with skills and competencies in supervision, changing roles of interviewing and transscribingOne researcher interview one student about a prepared case while the others listenedOne researcher interviewed the students about their reflectionsSession was used as basis for lecture
the next
day
.
Data
was
analyzed
of
both
researchers
in a
three-step
hermentetic
process, with
joint
reflection
sessions in-
between
Findings
were
corresponded
to
participants
for
validity
and
reliability
Findings were structered into 4 thematical headlines
PRESENTATION TITLE
11
Slide12Roles, rules
and judgement«This case was before ‘Kvello’ This was at the time
we used assessment and judgement
»
[a
popular norwegian scholar in psychology who has provided manuals and
checklists for child
welfare
social workers].PRESENTATION TITLE12
Slide13Balancing personal
engagement«The case workers like her [the client] a lot, and she
has always been all alone
.
But
how personally engaged are you supposed
to be, without becoming
unprofessional
»?PRESENTATION TITLE13
Slide14Being in the
middle«Being a leader, means I’m getting
further away from the
clients
. I
know the top managers perspectives better than
my emploees, and I know
my co-
worker’s
needs better than my bosses. At the same time I am responible for assisting the clients needs. And there is a contractor I have to facilitate for»PRESENTATION TITLE14
Slide15The existensial
loneliness ”This is a case that is hard for me. It keeps grinding all the time”
«I was really worried
,
but
when I met her I was not emotionally accessible. Just thinking. I
thought more about
overtime
and
stuff like that.»«I have 10 employees with 30 cases each. We don’t have time to reflect upon values and attitudes. We just talk case management, so I guess I blame lack of time then.»PRESENTATION TITLE15
Slide16Feedback afterwords
«I feel I got sorted the case, even
though we didn’t find
any
solution. Sorted on an ethical level
, not theoretical. The problem became
clearer
while I was talking»«In this case you had to generate a bigger picture, I thought a lot about my own viewpoint»PRESENTATION TITLE16
Slide17Points for further
analysis Complexity was not acknowledged as such
by the social workers
or
organizations
Telling the story unaffected by the listener’s views
increases understanding
of
one’s role and possibilities of action.Peer responses (when not advicing or evluating) gave support and ideas for further reflection.Too much focus on checklists and manuals in child welfare services can threaten professional assessement.The student stopped listening when peers started
talking about
what
she
should
have done, or
pointed
out
what
she
did
wrongly.
PRESENTATION TITLE
17
Slide18Points for further analysis
(cont.) Rigidification – not to overcome but to manage complexity
Stretching polarities rather
than
sorting in boxesDifferent languages on different levels in the organizationIn complex situation we
might become so
determined
on doing the right thing that we don’t do what we could doActive listening and naming and framing, was more important skills than sorting.The word existensial was recurring both in the supervision session and the group feedback. Is there room for an existensial perspective in social work practice?PRESENTATION TITLE18
Slide19Student feedback
Students enjoyed beeing part of a ‘research project’Working
with students experiences gave a bottom
-up
perspective
on knowledgeStarting with a practical
situation made students more
motivated
for
listening to lecturesPRESENTATION TITLE19
Slide20References
*Vetlesen, Arne Johan (2012). Bedre beskyttelse av barns utvikling. Etiske og filosofiske vurderinger av praksiser i barnevernet. I: Norges Barnevern nr. 1, 286-94. (8 sider)Vråle, Gry Bruland (2014). Veiledning når det røyner på. Kommende bok.
FOREDRAGETS TITTEL
20