PPT-____ 1) Which state’s voting results were key to determining the winner of the

a Ohio b Iowa c Texas d Florida 2 What finally decided the outcome of the 2000 presidential election a Congress . _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _____ _ TOTAL Federal Outlays1965911,2531,789in Defense Discretionary8154242in Nondefense Discretionary8172437 _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _____ _ TOTAL R&D ____/____/____ NOTE: This form cannot be used to request ECT or psychological testing . Type of Service Requested:  Mental Health  Substance Abuse Patient Name: _____ Charles Stewart III. June 1, 2012. Who won?. Who won?. How would we know?. Florida 2000 reminds us of what . V.O.. Key once wrote:. Over most of the United States, the conduct of elections is the most neglected and primitive branch of our public administration . . . . . October 22, 2009. Maura . Bardos. Outline. Two Candidates. Majority Rule. Three Candidates or More. Plurality. Borda. Condorcet. Sequential . Pairwise. Instant Runoff . Arrow’s Theorem. Approval voting. Lirong. Xia. Joint work with. . Vincent Conitzer. Jerome Lang. Sep 9, 2011. Computational voting theory IMHO. General combinatorial voting (computational perspective). Strategic sequential voting. . Making Group . Decisions. Mechanism design: study solution concepts. 7-. 1. We vote in awarding scholarships, teacher of the year, person to hire.. Rank feasible social outcomes based on agents' individual ranking of those outcomes. 1 Nissen Fundoplication Name:__________________________ ____ __ Date:___________________________ ____ __ Dietitian:__________________________ ____ Telephone:_______________________ ____ __ Questions? Copyright 2007 (909) 399-3104 www.pbguitarstudio.com POS II POS I POS III PENTATONIC LADDERS ____/____/____ Copyright 2007 Pebber Brown (909) 399-3104 www.pbguitarstudio.com PENTATONIC 1 /17 To day’s Date: ____/____/____ Group Name : ______________________________________ ________ _ _________________________ __________________________ Address: _______________________________ Mark Wang. John Sturm. Sanjeev. . Kulkarni. Paul Cuff. Basic Background – What is the problem?. Condorcet = IIA. Survey Data. Pairwise Boundaries = No strategic voting. Outline. How to make group decisions when you must.. with an Emphasis on Approval Voting. 1. Presenter: Celeste Landry. . . Voting is a process for making a collective decision. 2. An Important Distinction. Single-Winner (SW). : . governor, ward member, member of Congress. Jérôme. . Lang. with thanks to:. Let’s vote!. > >. . A . voting rule. determines winner based on votes. . > >. . > >. . 1. 2. Voting: Plurality rule. In voting theory, the goal is to make the largest number of people happy while allowing everyone to vote honestly.. Voting Theory. http://www.mclib.org/voting_booth.gif. http://www.hamburg.mi.us/clerk/images/vote-graphic.png. Dr. Lisa Handley. Redistricting Criteria Priority Pyramid: Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section 2 prohibits any voting standard, practice or procedure, including a redistricting plan, that results in the denial or dilution of minority voting strength..