PPT-____ 1) Which state’s voting results were key to determining the winner of the

Author : jane-oiler | Published Date : 2018-12-06

a Ohio b Iowa c Texas d Florida 2 What finally decided the outcome of the 2000 presidential election a Congress

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "____ 1) Which state’s voting resu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

____ 1) Which state’s voting results were key to determining the winner of the: Transcript


a Ohio b Iowa c Texas d Florida 2 What finally decided the outcome of the 2000 presidential election a Congress . _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _____ _ TOTAL Federal Outlays1965911,2531,789in Defense Discretionary8154242in Nondefense Discretionary8172437 _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ _____ _ TOTAL R&D ____/____/____ NOTE: This form cannot be used to request ECT or psychological testing . Type of Service Requested:  Mental Health  Substance Abuse Patient Name: _____ Dry & Slept ____ Dry & Woke ____ Wet during night ___ Dry & Slept ____ Dry & Woke ____ Wet during night ___ Dry & Slept ____ Dry & Woke ____ Wet during night ___ Dry & Slept ____ Dry & Woke ____ W unable _______ unbuckle ____ __ _______ _________ pretest __ ________ __ unlimited __ ______ ____ _______ unclear ________ precook ___ ________ unsure ____ _______ ______________________ ________ prep O October 22, 2009. Maura . Bardos. Outline. Two Candidates. Majority Rule. Three Candidates or More. Plurality. Borda. Condorcet. Sequential . Pairwise. Instant Runoff . Arrow’s Theorem. Approval voting. Lirong. Xia. Joint work with. . Vincent Conitzer. Jerome Lang. Sep 9, 2011. Computational voting theory IMHO. General combinatorial voting (computational perspective). Strategic sequential voting. . Making Group . Decisions. Mechanism design: study solution concepts. 7-. 1. We vote in awarding scholarships, teacher of the year, person to hire.. Rank feasible social outcomes based on agents' individual ranking of those outcomes. _____Se"'uaZ. .____-Diyestive. _____Spinal. ____Oereb•.al. } ___Hyste"ia. ___HYPOchondria. ________Hay-Fever. _____AsthenOPia. .;___Sleeplessness. 1: .. _____ Chorea. ._____Nea•.-si(Jhtednes 1 /17 To day’s Date: ____/____/____ Group Name : ______________________________________ ________ _ _________________________ __________________________ Address: _______________________________ Changes in the Franchise. Franchise: Right to vote. Read & annotate the “Changes in the Franchise” handout. . . Note . the voting qualifications regarding: . – Citizenship status, sex, age, race, residence. Child’s Name__________________________________________________. . LAST FIRST MI. Birthdate: _____/_____/____ Age:______ □ Male □ Female. with an Emphasis on Approval Voting. 1. Presenter: Celeste Landry. . . Voting is a process for making a collective decision. 2. An Important Distinction. Single-Winner (SW). : . governor, ward member, member of Congress. Jérôme. . Lang. with thanks to:. Let’s vote!. > >. . A . voting rule. determines winner based on votes. . > >. . > >. . 1. 2. Voting: Plurality rule.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"____ 1) Which state’s voting results were key to determining the winner of the"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents