/
Fertility change in Central and Eastern Europe: towards a new model of reproduction? Fertility change in Central and Eastern Europe: towards a new model of reproduction?

Fertility change in Central and Eastern Europe: towards a new model of reproduction? - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
392 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-20

Fertility change in Central and Eastern Europe: towards a new model of reproduction? - PPT Presentation

International Advisory Panel on Population and Development Republic of Moldova 2122 April 2016 Tom áš Sobotka Vienna Institute of Demography Austrian Academy of Sciences Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital ID: 633446

data fertility countries population fertility data population countries amp family europe 2014 women cee source european estimates 2015 moldova

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Fertility change in Central and Eastern ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Fertility change in Central and Eastern Europe: towards a new model of reproduction?

International Advisory Panel on Population and Development – Republic of Moldova, 21-22 April 2016

Tomáš SobotkaVienna Institute of Demography (Austrian Academy of Sciences), Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human CapitalSlide2

European fertility divides, 1980s

Main demographic divisions and cleavages, East and West of Europe, 1980s

CEE contrasted with Western & Northern Europe: Family and marriage almost universal, voluntary childlessness rareEarly family formation (unplanned pregnancies, shotgun weddings)Limited cohabitation and non-traditional family formsPronatalist family policies (only limited effect), often limited birth control and little knowledge on contraception, widespread abortionRestricted

international migration (Iron Curtain was real…)

Both East & WestSlow population growth, long-term shift to sub-replacement fertility

Two-child family normSlide3

European divisions (broader geographical regions)

Map

creator: http://edit.freemap.jp/enEastern EuropeCentral Europe“German-speaking” countries

South-eastern Europe

Nordic countriesWestern Europe

Southern EuropeSlide4

Agenda

Fertility transformations after 1989Three key trends in reproductive behaviourUncertain numbers: Data

issues in Central & Eastern Europe (CEE) and in Moldova“Our nation is dying”: The policy debates and responsesDiscussion: The new CEE diversitySlide5

Fertility transformations after 1989

economistmom.comSlide6

The global spread of low fertility

Number of countries with

period TFRs below 2.1 births per womanSource: own elaboration based on UN Fertility Database, 2013 and national statistical officesSlide7

The „fertility collapse“ and its slow recovery

Period Total Fertility Rates, selected CEE countries, 1985-2015

Sources: Eurostat, Human Fertility Database, National statistical officesSlide8

Period Total Fertility in broad European regions:

North & West vs. South & Centre & East

Source: European Demographic Data Sheet 2014 (VID/WIC 2014)Slide9

Mean age of mother at first birth, 1950-2014

Netherlands and Spain compared with 7 CEE countries

Source: Human Fertility Database,

Eurostat, own computations, Russian Fertility Database, MD: computations by K.

Zeman partly based on Penina

et al. (2015)

CEE countriesSlide10

Mean age of mother at first birth, 1950-2014

Netherlands and Spain compared with 7 CEE countries

Source: Human Fertility Database,

Eurostat, own computations, Russian Fertility Database, MD: computations by K.

Zeman partly based on Penina

et al. (2015)Slide11

Estimating the influence of fertility postponement: Conventional and tempo-adjusted TFR

Sources:

European Demographic Data Sheet 2014 and 2016 (forthcoming)Tempo effect in the EU in 2012 estimated at -0.15 (TFR 1.57, adjTFR 1.72)Slide12

Cohort fertility trends and variation

Observed and projected completed cohort fertility

by regions, women born 1960-1979

Myrskylä, M., J. Goldstein, and Y. Alice Cheng. 2012. “New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World: Rises, Falls, and Reversals.”

Popul. Dev. Rev. 39 (1): 31–56.Slide13

Childlessness

rankings: Top 5 and bottom

5 countriesEuropean Fertility Data Sheet 2015 (www.fertilitydatasheet.org) &Sobotka, T. 2016. “Childlessness in Europe: Reconstructing Long-Term Trends Among Women Born in 1900-1972.”Slide14

Rapid increase in one-child families

S. Basten, T. Frejka et al. 2016. “

Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe.” Forthcoming, Comparative Population Studies.

Share of women with a small family size (0 or 1), cohorts 1960 and 1970 (%)Slide15

The sharp rise of

non-marital childbearing (%)

Source:

Eurostat,

National statistical offices, Sobotka 2011Slide16

European Fertility Data Sheet

2015 (www.fertilitydatasheet.org)Slide17

Large education differences in fertility in CEE

Difference in family size of women with low and high education (children per woman, women born 1950-59)

European Fertility Data Sheet

2015 (www.fertilitydatasheet.org)Slide18

Ideal and intended family size in Europe strongly centered on having two children

Share of women with an ideal of having two children: European regions, 1979-2011

Sobotka, T. and É.

Beaujouan

. 2014. “Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe.”

Population and Development Review

40(3): 391-419.Slide19

Fertility intentions in Europe

Remarkable

lack of variation, two-child family norm almost universal

Also

no systematic variation by social status, very little difference between men and women

Mean intended family size of men and women aged 25-29, selected European countries, 1990s (FFS survey) and 2000s (GGS survey)

Mean, women

1990s (15 countries): 2.18

2000s (10 countries): 2.16

GGS and FFS data

analysed

by

Éva

Beaujouan

Slide20

Three key trends in reproductive behaviourSlide21

1. A shift away from abortion & towards more efficient contraception

Czech Republic:

Total induced abortion rate (abortions per woman) and % of women aged 15-44 using the contraceptive pill, 1985-2007

Source: UZIS (2012) and Czech Statistical OfficeSlide22

2. Rapid fall in teenage childbearing

Teenage fertility rate (births per 1000 women aged 15-49), selected countries, 1990 and 2014

:

Source: Eurostat (2016); Human Fertility Database (2016)Slide23

3. Falling frequency of „shotgun marriages“

Share of first marriages preceded by pre-marital conception (in %), 4 countries, 1950-2006

:

Source: Sobotka and

Toulemon

(2008: Figure 7)Slide24

Uncertain numbers:Data issues in CEE and in MoldovaSlide25

CEE: outmigration and biased population data

Population change since the 1990s:

Massive outmigration in many countries; Moldova, Baltic States, Bulgaria, eastern Germany losing 15-25% of their population

Rough estimate of net migration loss, without Russia: 9-13 million in 1989-2013 out of pop. 212 mill (including eastern Germany); 7-11 million without eastern GermanyConsequences for demographic dataOutmigration undercounted and underestimated in most countries

Statistical agencies struggle with trying to provide reliable data on age & sex distribution; frequent revisions (esp. after population censuses)Frequent Inconsistencies: de jure vs. de facto

(actual) population; including or excluding births to citizens abroadPopulation estimates highly uncertain and often upward biasedDemogr. Indicators: numerator – denominator biasSlide26

Moldova: biased population data

Particularly strong mismatch between actual and

de jure

populationStrong outmigration to EU countries and Russia

Underreported; citizens living abroad still mostly included in population structure estimates (de jure concept instead of the “usual residence” concept commonly applied in the EU)Population data were not adjusted to the actual population after the 2004 and 2014 Censuses

Affects especially women and men of reproductive ages Fertility underestimated: birth data mostly include children born in Moldova; population data also most of the citizens abroad

Recent effort to estimate “true” pop. structure and mortality by sex & age:

O. Penina, D. Jdanov, P. Grigoriev. 2015. “Producing reliable mortality estimates in the context of distorted statistics: the case of Moldova.” MPIDR Working Paper WP 2015-011.Slide27

Producing alternative fertility estimates for Moldova

Penina

, Jdanov &

Grigoriev’s (2015) population estimates for 1990-2014 can be sued to produce alternative fertility estimates for MoldovaBirths by age and birth order as observed in population registerPopulation: excluding Moldovan citizens living abroad

 using Penina et al. (2015) dataActual births in MD matched with the actual population in MD

Key assumption: Most of the births to MD citizens abroad not reported in MD vital statistics. If this assumption violated, the presented results would provide upward-biased estimates

Thank you to Krystof Zeman (VID) for computing the data presented hereSlide28

Estimated number of women aged 15-50

Data source:

O. Penina, D. Jdanov, P. Grigoriev. 2015Slide29

Estimated period Total Fertiltiy Rates, officail and elternative estimate

Data source: Population:

O. Penina, D. Jdanov, P. Grigoriev. 2015. Live births: Nat. Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. Computations by Krystof Zeman.Slide30

Interpretation, consequences

Initial (official) estimates:

Moldova has alongside Bosnia and Portugal the lowest TFR in Europe (2014), deep below EU averageNo significant fertility recovery after 2000

New estimates:Moldova has above-average TFR in Europe, slightly above the EU level (1.57)Significant increase in fertility in 2002 (1.43) to 2009 (1.70), similar to many other CEE countries

Thank you to

Krystof Zeman (VID) for computing the data presented hereSlide31

Interpretation, consequences

Total fertility rate 1985-2014: Official dataSlide32

Interpretation, consequences

Total fertility rate 1985-2014: Official data vs. alternative estimatesSlide33

“Our nation is dying

”: The policy debates and responses

Source:somatosphere.netSlide34

Many governments think fertility is too low

Government view on fertility level and government policy on fertility in 22 countries ever reaching a period total

fertility

of 1.40 or

below, 1996-2011

Source:

Sobotka 2013; based on UN reports &

UN World Population Policy Database; http://esa.un.org/PopPolicy/about_database.aspx Slide35

Public family & population policy discussions: different ideological underpinning

Demography high in political agenda in CEE

Family policies: the previous ones partly collapsing or abandonedPolicy reorientation often driven by ideological considerations & perceived need to lower government expenditures1990s: declining childcare availability; shift to the more “traditional” support of the prolonged stay of mothers at home

Policy turbulences; lacking coherence, frequent changesHungary: the least “effective” family policies?

Eastern and SE Europe: the return of explicit pronatalismRussia, Ukraine, Belarus: strong support for 2nd & higher-order births (RUS: “maternal capital”; UKR: high childcare allowances)

BG: nationalistic discussion on “Bulgaria’s collapse” coloured by strong anti-Roma sentiments (Kotzeva & Dimitrova 2014)Slide36

Selected policy trends in the EU-CEE countries after 2000

EU policies: also motivated by “enabling” people to fulfill their fertility intentions; not explicitly

pronatalist A slow expansion of public childcare coverage for children below age 3 (EU target to achieve at least 33% coverage in each country) Shorter, but better paid parental leave, with remuneration up to 100% of the previous wage (Estonia, Poland). Stimulating earlier return to employment Flexible leave arrangements: more flexibility in selecting leave period, “multispeed leave” (Czech

Republic) Tax rebatesEastern Europe: Cash support to

newborns and children: childcare allowances in Ukraine, “maternity capital” established at the time of child’s birth (second births in Russia)Slide37

SOURCE: Vanhuysse, P. 2013.

Intergenerational Justice in Aging Societies. A Cross-national Comparison of 29 OECD Countries

.

Gütersloh: BertelsmannStiftung, p. 27. www.sgi-network.org/pdf/Intergenerational_Justice_OECD.pdf‎

The elderly bias in social spending, OECD, 2007-8

Most pro-elderly biased countries: Poland, Greece, Italy, Slovakia, Czech Rep., Portugal, Slovenia, Austria,

EBiSS

>5Slide38

Discussion:The new CEE diversity?Slide39

The new model of reproduction?

Common trends across the region: Fertility decline in the 1990s and partial “recovery” in the 2000s; declining significance of marriage for reproduction; two-child family ideal; fall in early pregnancies and childbearing; “postponement transition”

Also persistent traditional gender attitudes and (mostly) negative attitudes to childlessness

Diversity, cross-country differences: First birth timing, extra-marital childbearing, one-child families, teenage fertility

Low fertility matter of concern, but migration often the key driver of population declineSlide40

Data issues: The importance of accounting for migration & consistent data concepts and definitions

Uncertain data, biased estimates

A need of adopting consistent concepts and definitions of resident population and corresponding vital statistics

A need to improve migration statistics and estimates to provide up-to-date statistics on population & demographic indicators

Proper evaluation of population trends impossible without solid dataSlide41

The importance of education transition

Rapid rise in tertiary education enrollment across the region, esp. among women

A key “explanation” of postponed family formation & lower fertility

Large education gradient in family size

Also more effective contraceptive use

Gender gap in tertiary education at age 30-34, Europe 2011

Source: VID/Wittgenstein Centre 2014: European Demographic Data Sheet 2014Slide42

tomas.sobotka@oeaw.ac.at

Work on this presentation was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC Grant agreement n° 284238 (EURREP).

EURREP website:

www.eurrep.org