PPT-Math and Metacognition: Resolving the Paradox

Shanna Erickson sericksonucmercededu Evan Heit eheitucmercededu University of California Merced It is common that people generally display glaring overconfidence in selfperception of their ability 1 2 A possible exception to the general overconfidence phenomenon is the occurrence of math phobia 3 This . (Anticipatory Ethics).  . Or. WHAT, ME WORRY?.  . By Art . Hayes. BOSTON AGA CHAPTER. JANUARY 23, 2014. 1. "For that which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it. Every one thinks chiefly of his own, hardly at all of the common interest; and only when he is himself concerned as an individual. For besides other considerations, everybody is more inclined to neglect the duty which he expects another to fulfill; as in families many attendants are often less useful than a few. Each citizen will have a thousand sons who will not be his sons individually, but anybody will be equally the son of anybody, and will therefore be neglected by all alike. Metacognition. :. Mechanisms of self-knowledge. . Stanislas Dehaene. Chair of Experimental Cognitive Psychology . Lecture. . Definitions and first paradoxes. Course translated from the French version by CG Traduction et . Jami . Durkee. Valerie . Toothman. Jason . Prindell. What is it?. Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy) was discovered by Bertrand . Russel. . in 1901. It showed that the naïve set theory created by Georg Cantor (which states any definable collection is a set) leads to a contradiction.. A situation or statement that seems to be impossible or contradictory but is nevertheless true, literally or figuratively.. 1. Paradox. Paradox - definition. A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true: . Phylogenetics. Ziheng. Yang , Mol. Biol. . Evol. . 2007. Presented by Caroline . Uhler. and Anna-. Sapfo. . Malaspinas. Outline. What is the star-tree paradox?. Simulations. Explanation: the fair-coin paradox.. Conflict.  . Resolving Conflict. . PURPOSE. Create a climate in which church leadership can deal appropriately with conflict.. Resolving Conflict. . OBJECTIVES. Identify the sources of church conflict.. (Part 1 of “Relationships God’s Way”). NIV . Matthew 5:23-24. Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift.  . — . a biased . overview. Don Perlis. Maryland Metacognition Seminar. http://xkcd.com/. Acknowledgements. Collaboration with NRL (. Perzanowski. , . Blisard. ). Large team (Anderson, Cox, . Dinalankara. TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED. RESOLVING POWER. LORD RAYLEIGH CRITERION. RESOLVING POWER OF TELESCOPE. RESOLVING POWER OF GRATING. RESOLVING POWER. . The ability of an optical instrument, expressed as numerical measure to resolve the images of two nearby points is called resolving power of instrument.. The role of affect in metacognition and self-regulated learning. Anastasia Efklides. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Keynote speech at the Symposium on Metacognition, Alps-Adria Psychology Conference,. A . paradox. is a statement that apparently contradicts itself and yet might be true (or wrong at same time). Some logical paradoxes are known to be . invalid. arguments but are still valuable in promoting . An . OXYMORON. . is a . combination of . contradictory. words. that are . stuck together. in a . way that actually . seems to . make sense.. open secret. act naturally. found missing. deafening silence. M.Ed. Kortschak Center for Learning & Creativity. Learning Outcomes. Understand the human brain, in terms of how we learn. . Learn how to use a variety of learning strategies with different materials. . Psych 605. Three Terms: Organizing the Concept. Metacognition. Self-Regulation. Self-regulated Learning. Bandura. Flavell. Exogenous. Constructivism. Endogenous. Constructivism. Spence. Piaget. Dialectical.