PPT-Teaching Machines to
Author : jane-oiler | Published Date : 2018-11-09
Converse Jiwei Li Computer Science Department Stanford University Collaborators Dan Jurafsky Stanford Alan Ritter Ohio State University Will Monroe Stanford
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Teaching Machines to" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Teaching Machines to: Transcript
Converse Jiwei Li Computer Science Department Stanford University Collaborators Dan Jurafsky Stanford Alan Ritter Ohio State University Will Monroe Stanford Michel Galley Microsoft Research. Let be the probability or fraction of time of being in state Balancing the 64258ow between state 0 and 1 yields 951 and similarly balancing the 64258ow between state 1 and 2 951 Together with the normalization 1 we get 1 ii The maximal throughp Not only are machines now able to deal with many kinds of information at high speed and in large quantities but also it is possible to manipulate these quan tities of information so as to benefit from them in entirely novel mays This is perhaps nowh What is a Simple Machine?. A simple machine has few or no moving parts.. Simple machines make work easier. Wheels and Axles. The wheel and axle are a simple machine. The axle is a rod that goes through the wheel which allows the wheel to turn. Introduction. CNC (Computer Numerical Control) Machines are automated machines, which uses programs to automatically execute a series of machining operations. .. CAD (Computer Aided Design) and CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) programs is used in modern CNC machines for end-to-end component design.. 1. Boltzmann Machine. Relaxation net with visible and hidden units. Learning algorithm. Avoids local minima (and speeds up learning) by using simulated annealing with stochastic nodes. Node activation: Logistic Function. CS 3410 Spring 2015. Mealy Machines and Moore Machines. In Mealy Machines, output and next state both depend on current state and input.. Next State . Current State. Input. Output. Comb.. Logic. Registers. Increasing Your Ability to Connect with Students. Marsha L. Bayless, Stephen F. Austin State University. Joshua changes my perception.. How Do You Relate to Your Students. First, you need to understand your perspective. Work. Work is done when a . force . (push or pull) causes an object to move in the . same direction . that the force is applied.. Formula: Work= Force x Distance . (W = F x D). If there is no movement, there is no work.. including Finite State Machines.. Finite State MACHINES. Also known as Finite State Automata. Also known as FSM, or State . Machines. Facts about FSM, in general terms. Finite State Machines are important . Why do we use machines?. Machines make doing work easier.. But they do not decrease the work that you do.. Instead, they . change the way you do work.. In general you trade more force for less distance or less force for more distance. including Finite State Machines.. Finite State MACHINES. Also known as Finite State Automata. Also known as FSM, or State . Machines. Facts about FSM, in general terms. Finite State Machines are important . How ed tech was born: Twentieth-century teaching machines--from Sidney Pressey\'s mechanized test-giver to B. F. Skinner\'s behaviorist bell-ringing box.Contrary to popular belief, ed tech did not begin with videos on the internet. The idea of technology that would allow students to go at their own pace did not originate in Silicon Valley. In Teaching Machines, education writer Audrey Watters offers a lively history of predigital educational technology, from Sidney Pressey\'s mechanized positive-reinforcement provider to B. F. Skinner\'s behaviorist bell-ringing box. Watters shows that these machines and the pedagogy that accompanied them sprang from ideas--bite-sized content, individualized instruction--that had legs and were later picked up by textbook publishers and early advocates for computerized learning.Watters pays particular attention to the role of the media--newspapers, magazines, television, and film--in shaping people\'s perceptions of teaching machines as well as the psychological theories underpinning them. She considers these machines in the context of education reform, the political reverberations of Sputnik, and the rise of the testing and textbook industries. She chronicles Skinner\'s attempts to bring his teaching machines to market, culminating in the famous behaviorist\'s efforts to launch Didak 101, the pre-verbal machine that taught spelling. (Alternate names proposed by Skinner include Autodidak, Instructomat, and Autostructor.) Telling these somewhat cautionary tales, Watters challenges what she calls the teleology of ed tech--the idea that not only is computerized education inevitable, but technological progress is the sole driver of events. How ed tech was born: Twentieth-century teaching machines--from Sidney Pressey\'s mechanized test-giver to B. F. Skinner\'s behaviorist bell-ringing box.Contrary to popular belief, ed tech did not begin with videos on the internet. The idea of technology that would allow students to go at their own pace did not originate in Silicon Valley. In Teaching Machines, education writer Audrey Watters offers a lively history of predigital educational technology, from Sidney Pressey\'s mechanized positive-reinforcement provider to B. F. Skinner\'s behaviorist bell-ringing box. Watters shows that these machines and the pedagogy that accompanied them sprang from ideas--bite-sized content, individualized instruction--that had legs and were later picked up by textbook publishers and early advocates for computerized learning.Watters pays particular attention to the role of the media--newspapers, magazines, television, and film--in shaping people\'s perceptions of teaching machines as well as the psychological theories underpinning them. She considers these machines in the context of education reform, the political reverberations of Sputnik, and the rise of the testing and textbook industries. She chronicles Skinner\'s attempts to bring his teaching machines to market, culminating in the famous behaviorist\'s efforts to launch Didak 101, the pre-verbal machine that taught spelling. (Alternate names proposed by Skinner include Autodidak, Instructomat, and Autostructor.) Telling these somewhat cautionary tales, Watters challenges what she calls the teleology of ed tech--the idea that not only is computerized education inevitable, but technological progress is the sole driver of events. Optima Weightech details about discovering the important features of packaging machines. For more details, visit: https://optimaweightech.com.au/.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Teaching Machines to"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents