PPT-The 7 C’s of Argumentation

C onsider the Situation What is the topic What is my purpose Who is my audience What action do I want my audience to take C larify your thinking What are you trying to prove . Reading to learn in . all. content areas. When you think of an argument, you probably. think of something like the following:. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnTmBjk-M0c. What argument ISN’T. Argument (argumentation) is a method that. Objectives:. Students will have a basic understanding of the history of formal argumentation.. Students will compare and contrast disagreement and contradiction to argumentation and debate.. Students will summarize the definition of an argument.. to . Find the Argumentation . Bones. Every book has a skeleton hidden . between its . covers. Your job as an analytic reader is to find it.. X-ray the book to locate its arguments.. X-raying at three levels. The mechanics of taking a firm stand aiming to persuade an audience. Arguments are Everywhere. Making an argument = expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence.. This is often the most important task of academic writing. Often, this is also an unstated expectation.. The “Argumentation . &. . Advocacy” Course in . GenEd. Carol Tutzauer. Center for Educational . Innovation. Frank . Tutzauer. Department of Communication. Universit. y. at Buffalo. The Standard . snob. appeal. bandwagon. sex. appeal. out of context quotation. half. truth. ethos. logos. pathos. WORDS ABOUT Argumentation by M. Uhland oxymoron . Question: What do the following things have in common?. Answer. : All of them represent argumentation in contemporary society. . Everything’s an Argument. Unit 1, Lesson 1. TASK 1 – Arguments Are Everywhere. Social Context. Iyad Rahwan. Introduction. Argument takes place in a social context. Arguing with oneself vs. arguing with others. New challenges:. How does the audience evaluate arguments?. How do arguers strategize?. International Colloquium on the Role of Analogy in Argumentative Discourse. University of Coimbra, May 13, 2012. Douglas Walton. CRRAR. Starting Point. There is such a huge literature on argument from analogy that during the early stages of my career I avoided work on the subject because so many scholars in so many fields had already written so much about it. . I will . entreat. Mrs. Stelzer to bring snacks for everyone.. English 10. February 24. I Can…:. Understand and analyze characters.. Analyze arguments . Plan:. Review vocabulary. Quiz on . Caesar. Finish pages 978-990 (multiple choice questions and constructed response). Chapter 4. A Strategy of Control. Chapter 4. What happens in a debate is the product of choices debaters make. Far too many debaters approach a debate round from a passive perspective, believing their responsibility is to merely track and respond to what happens in the round.. Everyday Perspective. Interpersonal conflict=2 people engaged in verbal hostility. How do I win these arguments?. Debate=verbal competition. Collaboration=working out disagreements constructively. Cooperative knowledge seeking. to Argumentation Mining in Natural Language Text. Topic 2. 4/14/2014. Huy V. Nguyen. 1. Outline. Introduction to argumentation. Argumentation mining the problem. Argumentation v. discourse. Annotation and corpora. ARGUMENTATION METHODS OF ARGUMENT RECONSTRUCTION Douglas Walton CRRAR FMAR, Konstanz, Sept. 21, 2012 Argumentation Schemes The current problem with trying to evaluate plausible reasoning using systems of weights with numerical values is that there can be many ways of doing this.