PPT-Arguing in a

Social Context Iyad Rahwan Introduction Argument takes place in a social context Arguing with oneself vs arguing with others New challenges How does the audience evaluate arguments How do arguers strategize. The Netherlands Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool UK Abstract Stories can be powerful argumentative vehicles an d they are often used in arguments from analogy most notably as parables or allegories where the story illustrates Mullany and Handford14 (arguing for liability based on reasonable foreseeability), but the House took the view that it could not alter the law [1999] 2 AC 455. 13 In chap. 7 of vol 2 of The Frontier By Michael A. Gilbert. Professor of Philosophy. York University. Canada. Broadview Press. 2014. Part . Three. Arguing with People. Good Arguments. Arguments come in many types:. Serious and silly . Long and short. View as slide show. Adapted from AdPrin.com. Abolish . fraternities?. A 12-minute film showed a college professor arguing that fraternities encouraged cheating, dishonesty, social snobbishness, and racial discrimination -- as a result, they should be abolished. . The Reader. In reality, likely only one person will read your paper: me.. However, writing papers in class is supposed to be training you to write papers . for a general audience. . . Therefore you should write your paper as if people who don’t know you, have never been to this class, and do not know who I am are going to read it.. Hillenbrand.qxp 7/29/08 12:59 PM Page 50 as true as ever.Better Luck Tomorrow(Justin Lin, 2003) astiplex gate; if mainstream and Asian America are to meet, it must FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . Charles Paine, Professor, University of New Mexico. Richard Johnson-Sheehan, Professor, Purdue University. Welcome: Arguing Today. Controlling metaphor for argument: “Argument is War”. Consequences of this metaphor. TO The second edition has been reorganized to be even more user friendly.been added to several chapters.Research, organizational tasks, and bibliographic work can now be completed—using online to By Michael A. . Gilbert. Professor . of Philosophy. York University. Canada. Broadview Press. 2014. Part 1. All . About Arguments. Product and Process. Argument as. . product. when an argument is a thing, an object.. What’s at Stake in Teaching Argument. James Miller. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Texas State Board of Education: Who’s In, Who’s Out. President Barack Obama, 2014. “Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation for growth that will not only withstand future economic storms, but one that helps us strive and compete in the global economy. It’s time to reform our colleges so that they provide Americans a chance to learn the skills and knowledge necessary to compete for the jobs of the future.” . Produced by Anas Maamoun. The Author. Anton . Checkov. : (1860-1904) . A Russian . author who lived between 1860 and 1904. Best known for his short stories and plays, Anton Chekhov also worked as a physician. His job as a doctor did not pay very well, so Chekhov did a lot of different things for money, including writing.. Arguing About Bioethics is a fresh and exciting collection of essential readings in bioethics, offering a comprehensive introduction to and overview of the field. Influential contributions from established philosophers and bioethicists, such as Peter Singer, Thomas Nagel, Judith Jarvis Thomson and Michael Sandel, are combined with the best recent work in the subject.Organised into clear sections, readings have been chosen that engage with one another, and often take opposing views on the same question, helping students get to grips with the key areas of debate. All the core issues in bioethics are covered, alongside new controversies that are emerging in the field, including:embryo research selecting children and enhancing humans human cloning using animals for medical purposes organ donation consent and autonomy public health ethics resource allocation developing world bioethics assisted suicide. Each extract selected is clear, stimulating and free from unnecessary jargon. The editor\'s accessible and engaging section introductions make Arguing About Bioethics ideal for those studying bioethics for the first time, while more advanced readers will be challenged by the rigorous and thought-provoking arguments presented in the readings. Why Argue?. Argument is not in itself an end or a purpose of communication. It is rather a means of discourse, a way of developing what we have to say. We can identify four primary aims or purposes that argument helps us accomplish:.