PPT-Arguing With People

By Michael A Gilbert Professor of Philosophy York University Canada Broadview Press 2014 Part Three Arguing with People Good Arguments Arguments come in many types Serious and silly Long and short. But doesnt follow of course that there arent any good arguments Are there some At least a couple of dozen or so Swinburne good argument one that has premises that everyone knows Maybe arent any such arguments and if there are some maybe none of them Mullany and Handford14 (arguing for liability based on reasonable foreseeability), but the House took the view that it could not alter the law [1999] 2 AC 455. 13 In chap. 7 of vol 2 of The Frontier Machine. Analysis of Auto-Generated Code. Jacob . Cox. Jacob.t.cox@ivv.nasa.gov. 1. Agenda. Types of code . verification. General discussion of code generation. Some experiences. 2. The Simple Life. In the beginning . “Servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God” (1 Cor. 4:1, NKJV).. “It is required in stewards that one be found faithful” (1 Cor. 4:2).. “With me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by a human court, in fact, I do not even judge myself” (1 Cor. 4:3).. Sissel. The Baby Viking. By . Elinor. Roberts . and. Alana Huggins. Sissel. was sitting in the bath whilst playing with his hand carved duck. Dana was sitting on a chair watching over him. . Sissel. The Reader. In reality, likely only one person will read your paper: me.. However, writing papers in class is supposed to be training you to write papers . for a general audience. . . Therefore you should write your paper as if people who don’t know you, have never been to this class, and do not know who I am are going to read it.. FIE 2009: Special Session. Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech. Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN. Introduce Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC) ~ 15 min. Actively Participate in CAC ~60 min. Topic: . By Michael A. . Gilbert. Professor . of Philosophy. York University. Canada. Broadview Press. 2014. Part 1. All . About Arguments. Product and Process. Argument as. . product. when an argument is a thing, an object.. Virtues and Vices and the Tools of the Lazy . Mind. Dave Monroe. & . Christy Powers. Aristotle: Intellectual vs. Moral Virtues. Intellectual Character vs. Moral Character. Dispositional Properties. What’s at Stake in Teaching Argument. James Miller. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Texas State Board of Education: Who’s In, Who’s Out. President Barack Obama, 2014. “Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation for growth that will not only withstand future economic storms, but one that helps us strive and compete in the global economy. It’s time to reform our colleges so that they provide Americans a chance to learn the skills and knowledge necessary to compete for the jobs of the future.” . Charles Paine, Professor, University of New Mexico. Richard Johnson-Sheehan, Professor, Purdue University. Welcome: Arguing Today. Controlling metaphor for argument: “Argument is War”. Consequences of this metaphor. Everything is an argument…. -When you hear the word “argument,” what springs to mind?. -“Argument” encompasses more than the common connotation.. -An argument can be any text—written, spoken, aural, or visual—that expresses a point of view.. Chapter One The Invisible Argument Everything is an argument… -When you hear the word “argument,” what springs to mind? -“Argument” encompasses more than the common connotation. -An argument can be any text—written, spoken, aural, or visual—that expresses a point of view. Why Argue?. Argument is not in itself an end or a purpose of communication. It is rather a means of discourse, a way of developing what we have to say. We can identify four primary aims or purposes that argument helps us accomplish:.