UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

UTILIZINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

Slide2

INTRODUCTION

Team

City of Greensboro

HDR Constructors

Garney

Capital Improvement Needs

Townsend WTP

TZO WRF

CMAR

vs.

Alternate Delivery Methods

Slide3

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Construction Manager at Risk

(CMAR)

in Greensboro

Owner Objectives / Goals

RFQ Process

CM Selection

Design and Partnering

Designer and CM

Pre-Construction Timeline

Slide4

DESIGN-BID-BUILD Traditional Baseline for Project DeliveryProven Procurement SolutionDIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

PROCESS

Slide5

Design-Bid-Build ADVANTAGESCompetitively BidSeparate ContractsSelf-Performance CapabilitiesTime-Tested Process / Used in All StatesMaximizes Owner InputDIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide6

Design-Bid-Build DISADVANTAGESLimited Collaboration / TeamworkEliminates Qualifications-Based SelectionNo Contractual RelationshipAdversarial ApproachLow BidValue EngineeringDesign DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide7

DESIGN-BUILDDesign and Construction Fixed PriceBased on Concept Design and/or Description from Procurement DocumentsDIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

CONSTRUCTION

PROCESS

Slide8

Design-Build ADVANTAGESTeam Qualifications-Based SelectionAccelerated Schedule Public Acceptance for Lump-Sum ContractSelf-Performing Contractor Controls ScheduleKnown Performance CriteriaFinal GMPDIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide9

Design-Build DISADVANTAGESLonger Procurement ProcessEliminates or Reduces Participation in Procurement ProcessInefficient Use of Municipal Funds and Staff Time Bidding ProcessDIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide10

CMARQualifications-Based SelectionContractor Engaged Early in Design PhaseTwo-Contract Relationship DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW

CONSTRUCTION

PROCESS

Slide11

CMAR ADVANTAGESOwner Control of Project Goals Provides for Value Engineering (VE) and Constructability ReviewsContractor-Led EstimatesReduces Overall RiskSchedule AccelerationCompetitive Selection DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide12

CMAR DISADVANTAGESEngineer’s Estimate for Initial Project CostsPotential Cost Increase with VE and Constructability Review Preconstruction Services CostDouble-BondingSeparate ContractsIncreased Design Duration DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Slide13

TZO WATER RECLAMATION FACILITYRetrofitting Existing Anthracite Media Filters with new Aqua-Aerobic Systems Diamond Cloth Filter EquipmentNew Chlorine Contact TankChemical System UpgradesSite-Wide Stormwater ImprovementsElectrical Improvements

Slide14

PRECONSTRUCTION AT TZOEstimates at 90% Document PhaseDevelopment of CPM Schedule Executed Mentor / Protégé Program with Local MBE, SRSM/WBE Work Packages

Slide15

TZO CHALLENGES AND BENEFITSChallenges & BenefitsDividing Competitive Work PackagesFlexibility with NCDEQ Filter Construction Sequencing - Eliminating Option to Bypass FiltersIncreasing Minority ParticipationConstructability / Cost Review at 90%

Slide16

TZO SCHEDULEWork PackagesConstraints of Existing Plant OperationsMinimal Shutdowns / Uninterrupted Access

Effluent Filter Modifications

One Bank of Filters Off-Line Per Time

Slide17

TOWNSEND WATER TREATMENT PLANTLime / PAC FacilityFlocculation & Sedimentation BasinsFilter UpgradesBackwash Process UpgradesMAY 16

–

DEC 17

JAN 15

–

DEC 15

PRECONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION

Slide18

TOWNSEND PRECON METHODOLOGYCost Models60% DocumentsVEEarly Project Schedule DevelopmentInput from O&M Staff, Engineer and SubcontractorsDetermines General Conditions DurationSubcontracting PackagesFacilitate Area MarketClear Scope Delineation

Slide19

TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - GMPOpen Book EnvironmentCollaborative Preconstruction WorkshopsProactive Project Execution Planning - Plant Production RestrictionsConstructability and Value Analysis

Procurement (Buy-Out) Plan

Start-Up and Commissioning Plan

Slide20

TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS – M/WBEAspirational GoalsCommitment to M/WBE ProgramOutreach and Communication with Interested IndividualsProvide Guidance during Bidding, Contracting and Construction Phases

Ensure Parties Follow City’s Guidelines for Implementation

Slide21

CMAR AT TOWNSEND WTPQualifications-Based SelectionBetter Control of Construction Implementation of M/WBE ProgramCollaborative and Team-Oriented Project DeliveryLess Adversarial Construction Environment

Slide22

TOWNSEND – ENGAGING THE CMAR EARLY60% Design DocumentsUnderstand Project BudgetAbility to Value Engineer ProjectEarly Development of CPM

Slide23

TOWNSEND – CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - MOPOMaintenance of Plant Operations (MOPO)Ability to RedesignIdentify Schedule ConstraintsMinimize Timeframe for OutagesAbility to Understand Construction Sequencing

Slide24

TOWNSEND PROJECT SCHEDULEEarly Development of CPM ScheduleIdentified SequencingIncorporated Peak TimesSequenced MOPOs

Slide25

OWNER CHALLENGES - LEGALContract Vehicle State Standard Contract vs. CMAA vs. AIAPrequalification ProcessState Statute RequirementsCriteria to Prequalify Target Audience for the Process

Slide26

OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBEDisparity StudyHispanic Participation - Goal AchievementSetting of GoalsGMP Estimate or Trade PackagesBid ResponsivenessPrequalification vs. BidsHUB Understanding of Formal Bid Process

Slide27

OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE (CONT.)Mentor – ProtégéCity ProcedureGoal AchievementNew Process for Evaluating Good FaithCM Level and Sub-Tier LevelMandatory PrequalificationParticipation ResponsivenessEducation

Slide28

OWNER CHALLENGES - DESIGNDesign Completion Level60% Townsend vs. 90% TZOSelf-PerformanceState StatuteTeam CohesivenessExperience Receptiveness to FeedbackDesign Review ProcessConstructability and VE

Slide29

GMP Finalization / Sub-Contract ExecutionBudgeting Value Engineering Construction PhaseNTP and DurationNEXT STEPS

Slide30

M/WBE UnderstandingBudgeting / Value EngineeringPrequalification ProcessStaff Understanding of CMAR ProcessEducate Key Departments / StaffDevelop Procedures to Support Delivery Method KEY TAKEAWAYS

Slide31

QUESTIONS?