Jacques McMillan

Jacques McMillan Jacques McMillan - Start

2017-08-06 42K 42 0 0

Description

jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be. Has Accreditation fulfilled the expectations?. Jacques McMillan. Former European Commission Official responsible for regulatory policy for the free movement of goods and market surveillance. ID: 576464 Download Presentation

Embed code:
Download Presentation

Jacques McMillan




Download Presentation - The PPT/PDF document "Jacques McMillan" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.



Presentations text content in Jacques McMillan

Slide1

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

Has Accreditation fulfilled the expectations?

Jacques McMillanFormer European Commission Official responsible for regulatory policy for the free movement of goods and market surveillance

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

1

Slide2

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

Introduction

From technical barriers to trade to product safety legislation;From prevention of new technical barriers and harmonisation to the development of common tools over and beyond product safety to include the framework elementsFrom common tools to the development of TRUST.

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

2

Slide3

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

The evolutions

The move from the concentration on products to the inclusion of framework elements accompanied the evolutions at the national level where there was a move away from the “all government system” to a gradual outsourcing of: first, product specification writingthen, testingthen, certification/inspectionthen, accreditation

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

3

Slide4

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

The point of departure of the New Approach

1979 EC Cassis de Dijon Court case: Member states can only stop products for non respect of “essential” health safety requirements.Ergo: we should only harmonise essentials and leave everything else out of EU legislation  the New Approach in 1985BUT this is a legal principle, not a means to creating trustThe original idea was that this “everything else” would sort itself out without public authority intervention, but this was a dream: it was too simple!We needed to build a full policy on the basis of the new approach

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

4

Slide5

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

Who wanted what in the 80s

Governments wanted to downsize their activities but wanted more controls on products, especially mass produced, on manufacturers & on CABs.Manufacturers were faced with product liability (85/347) and needed CA support, but wanted reduction of multiple certificates.CABs wanted more freedom but also a level playing field.Consumers wanted credible guarantees on the quality & safety of products & on an overall clear & transparent system.

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

5

Slide6

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

The « Sum » of trust

Level of Safety+ Quality of products+Quality of measurements+ Qaulity of eco operators+ Quality of CA procedures+ Quality of third parties (CABs)+ Quality of Accreditation+ Quality of market surveillance+ Quality of controls from third countries--------------------------------------------------== Safe products------------------------------------------------------(Markings, CE & others)

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

6

Slide7

The New Legislative Framework

Accreditation Public authority activity1 national accreditation body (NAB) per Member StatePrevention of competition for NABs Set of requirements for NABsEA (European co-operation for accreditation)Cross border accreditation (EA role) Peer evaluation (EA role)Rules applicable to mandatory & voluntary area

+32 (0)475 68 00 82

Jacques McMillan jacques.mcmillan@telenet.be

7

Slide8

Accreditation last control before market

So Accreditation must control: the quality of CABs for public authoritiesfor the benefit of:CABs, public authorities, manufacturers and consumersmust set level playing field for manufacturers and CABs

8

Slide9

Why Accreditation & not something else?

a technical quality toolbased on international textsindependenttransparent: can be seen to operatetransparent peer evaluation of memberspeer evaluation system overviewed by public authorities & other stakeholderspulls the level of quality upthere is no other system that gives the same level of trust through such transparency

9

Slide10

EA versus EU Accreditation body

EA is transparent and can be seen to operateIn EA dog watches dogIn EA better bodies do not want to be dragged down: so cooperation and mutual supportso quality developmentsingle body more opaque, less motivation for quality development, less checks and balances64 000 $ question: who controls it?

10

Slide11

Why Regulation 765/2008?

To stabilise the rules of the systemTo clearly set responsibilities of national authorities, EU Commission, ABs, etc.It is directly applicableTo act as guardrail against temptations:to go commercial to multiply bodiesto reinvent wheelsTo protect and promote the EU system in the face of the world market

11

Slide12

Has the system answered expectations?

YES but with room for improvement.The system is in place and clearly works wellAcceptance of accredited certificates has become naturalTheir credibility is rarely questionedThe strength and seriousness of the EU system is recognised throughout the rest of the world and vastly copied (who is jealous?)

12

Slide13

Has the system answered expectations?

In general terms:

Manufacturers are satisfied – system credible; more systematic recourse to CA; no longer need multiple certificates.

Market place is safer & more transparent.

Public authorities satisfied but recognise that market surveillance remains necessary.

Consumers satisfied: products safer, quality is up & where problems, more quickly identified & treated in the open, within a coherent clear system.

Slide14

Has the system answered expectations?

Regulation will need further refinement in the years to come (financing of accreditation, definition of independence & vis a vis whom)

The collective strength and credibility of EA still needs to be reinforced: role of peer evaluation

National authorities are still attracted by reinvention of wheels

Slide15

Challenges for Accreditation in EU

Need for a financial system to protect against temptation to go commercialAccreditation to remain control of CABs and not for products/personnelMust remain horizontal tool and not go sectoralThe objective remains one certificate, one marketAvoid proliferation of certification systems (9000, 14000, 17000, 18000 etc.)

15

Slide16

Conclusions?

Thank you for your attention


About DocSlides
DocSlides allows users to easily upload and share presentations, PDF documents, and images.Share your documents with the world , watch,share and upload any time you want. How can you benefit from using DocSlides? DocSlides consists documents from individuals and organizations on topics ranging from technology and business to travel, health, and education. Find and search for what interests you, and learn from people and more. You can also download DocSlides to read or reference later.