PPT-The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

AO data 63015 Court 2014 AO data 63015 Caseload as of June 30 2015 AO data 63015 Where Do The Come From AO data 63015 AO data 63015 Median Processing Times NOA Decision. 0855028 PlaintiffAppellant DC No v CV0601792R EW C INGULAR W IRELESS S ERVICES ORDER AND NC ATT C ORPORATION AMENDED DefendantsAppellees OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L Real Distr S COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH CIRCUIT APPELLANTS FORM A Appeal Docket No Appeal Information Form To be filed with the Notice of Appeal STYLE OF CASE COUNSEL NAME ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER Appellan judges, the Ninth Circuit convenes a After the Decision. John Blakeley. Susan . Gelmis. Andrew . Knapp. Stacy Tolchin. After the judgment: timeline. Petition for rehearing : 45 days after circuit decision. Same timeline for dispositive motions. Ninth Circuit Analysis lacks Precedent.............................561 Ninth Circuit View is an Island.........................................563 C. In April of 2005, the Supreme Court of the United I concur RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I concur OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract App OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS , Judge.Defendant-appellant Brima Bumu appeals from the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLANT Jack Kenney Stacy R. Uliana Bargersville, Indiana A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE MEMORANDUM DECISION Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D) this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicat The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO , Plaintiff - Appel l ee , vs. BRIMA BUMU , Defendant - Appell ant . : : : : : APPEAL NO. C - 1 604 92 TRIAL NO. B - 0410574A O IN REENORE LALBERTESQUIREDebtorLENORE LBERTSQUIRE AKA Lenore L Albert-Offices of Lenore AlbertAppellantvJEFFREY AN TrusteeAppelleeNo20-60006BAP NoOPINIONAppeal from the Ninth CircuitThe panel unanimou To resolve Federal tax controversies without litigation on a basis which is fair and impartial to both the Government and the taxpayer promotes a consistent application and interpretation of and volun INKLERDefendant-appellant Cleveland Saunders appeals his convictions for murder and carrying concealed weapons In the second of six assignments of error Saunders argues that the trial court erred by