0151 794 8290 . ethics@Liverpool.ac.uk. www.liverpool.ac.uk/intranet/research-support-office/research-ethics. /. Research Ethics? . Research Ethics . is a world-wide set of principles governing the way any research involving interaction between the researcher and other humans or human tissue or data relating to humans, is designed, managed and conducted. In preparing a research project, the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of human participants must at all times be considered, respected and safeguarded. .
Download Presentation - The PPT/PDF document "Research Ethics Matthew Billington" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
Presentation on theme: "Research Ethics Matthew Billington"— Presentation transcript:
is a world-wide set of principles governing the way any research involving interaction between the researcher and other humans or human tissue or data relating to humans, is designed, managed and conducted. In preparing a research project, the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of human participants must at all times be considered, respected and safeguarded.
The application of moral rules and professional codes of conduct to the collection, analysis, reporting, and publication of information about research subjects, in particular active acceptance of subjects' right to privacy, confidentiality, and informed consent. Slide3
Research Ethics at University of Liverpool
involving human participants, animals, their tissues or data (
which, in addition to experimental and quantitative data, can include qualitative (descriptive) data, transcripts of interviews, etc.)
have ethical approval from a University of Liverpool-recognised research ethics committee.
must not start prior to ethical approval being obtained
Retrospective approval cannot be given
Respecting the rights and dignity of human participants
Legal frameworks and policies e.g. Data Protection Act, consent;
Practicalities of reducing risk
Creates better research
Research that results in benefits and has minimal risk of harm is research that has been carried out in an ethical manner. Slide4
Research Ethics at University of Liverpool
Research ethics approval is not required for:
Research which does not involve human participants, their data/tissues (literature analysis).
Secondary analysis of non-identifiable information.
Secondary analysis of information freely available in the public domain.Slide5Slide6
Consent is the central act in research ethics, in accordance with the University’s key principles, researchers should ensure that every person from whom data is collected for the purpose of research, consents freely to the process on the basis of adequate information. Participants should also be made aware that they are free to withdraw or modify their consent at any point of the research taking place.
Research staff and participants must be informed fully about the purpose, methods and intended possible uses of the research, what their participation in the research entails and what risks, if any, are involved.
Step 1: The giving of information
Step 2: The discussion, clarification and review of the information
Step 3: Obtaining the person's written and/or verbal consentSlide7
The confidentiality of information supplied by research participants and the anonymity of respondents must be respected.
When one person discloses personal information to another believing that it will be held in confidence, a duty of confidence and trust is created.
'The appropriate use and protection of patient data are also paramount. All those involved in research must be aware of their legal and ethical duties. Particular attention must be given to systems for ensuring confidentiality of personal information and to the security of those systems'.
Providing anonymity wherever possible
Safe storage of the data
Restricting access to the research teamSlide8
Research proposals should be considered in the context of the risks of the project, this can be defined as the potential physical or psychological harm or stress to the participant or the researcher. When considering a research project the benefits needs to be maximised and the risks minimised. Risks and benefits should be explained to participant as part of the informed consent process.
Social and Economic Harm
How to minimise risk
Researchers can minimise the risk of a study by implementing research that includes a well informed protocol, assemble a research team with sufficient expertise, incorporate adequate safeguards, ensure participants autonomy is maximised and ensure the benefits are maximised. A well documented risk assessment should establish that the risks of your research are minimised. Slide9
Staff Project from the Institute
of Psychology, Health and
Society, which came to full committee review last year.
Flagged to central full committee- interview/sensitiveSlide10
Research Aims and Designs
The research involved investigating drinking behaviours following periods of absence from drinking (e.g. Dry January)
The researchers proposed to provide participants with a breathalyser and a smartphone app in order to record drinking behaviours. A questionnaire would then be administered to review the participant’s perspectives against the data from the app.Slide11
The committee requested further information on how the consent process would look for the questionnaire
The committee recommended that a welcome page was added to the questionnaire which provided information on the study; and contained a consent box through which the participants could tick in order to access the rest of the questionnaireSlide12
proposed to make photocopies of participant's ID’s/
passports for verification purposes as part of the breathalyser element of the study.
committee felt that this was unnecessarily collecting identifiable data which could later compromise confidentiality and anonymity. The
the research design to take a digital photograph of each participant. Slide13
committee were concerned regarding
the proposal to send
breathalyser data to the USA from
The researchers made
modifications to the
that all participants were loaned a mobile phone with the
downloaded, meaning no identifiable information was being transmitted. Slide14
The Committee recommended that as the study had the potential to
cause distress to
participants, a debrief sheet should be produced to provide further
and support resources to participants.
The committee also suggested that the researchers prepare a procedure for managing participant distress.
The researchers were asked to provide a lone worker risk assessment to cover the interviews which involved the researchers working alone with participants.
Research Ethics Matthew Billington - Description
0151 794 8290 ethicsLiverpoolacuk wwwliverpoolacukintranetresearchsupportofficeresearchethics Research Ethics Research Ethics is a worldwide set of principles governing the way any research involving interaction between the researcher and other humans or human tissue or dat ID: 679853 Download Presentation
What it is and getting approval at LSHTM. John Porter. 2. Outline. Research ethics principles. Ethics review. Consent. Confidentiality. Ethics in the field. Making an ethics application to LSHTM. [Key reference: Rhodes & .
Jan Deckers. School of Medical Sciences. Education Development. Email:. . email@example.com. Objectives. To reflect. on what (research) ethics is.. To develop. your skills as an ethical researcher..
Issues in Research Ethics. Coercion. $$$, extra credit, social pressures. Privacy. Deception. Physiology of cheating. Discomfort or Harm. Right to . Service. Experimental group gets beneficial treatment, control group does not..
CLASS 3, Section 1 . THE STUDY OF ETHICS. Attitudes of. Good Ethics. MINISTERIAL. ETHICS. CLASS NUMBER 3. SECTION ONE. THE STUDY OF ETHICS. THE CHALLENGE? . PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. . THE VICTORIOUS LIFE AND SOME EXAMPLES..
Helena Siipi. University of Turku. firstname.lastname@example.org. Contents. Ethics for authors. Ethics for referees. 3. . Ethics for publishers. . 1. Ethics for authors. Who is the author?. Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity 2012: .
how health research is reviewed. This presentation has been developed to form part of the lesson ‘Research ethics and how health research gets reviewed’ - www.nuffieldbioethics.org/education. ‘Clinical research’ - What is it?.
Winchester. Bridget Egan. Supervisor training. Two forms:. An accredited programme for new supervisors (and anyone who wishes to complete it. Occasional sessions (within the programme) for experienced supervisors.
Bangkok, November 30 & December 1. Case study: Ethical process on the qualitative research. “. Labour. Exploitation, Trafficking and Migrant Health: Multi-country Findings on the Health Risks and Consequences of Migrant and Trafficked Workers”.