F Hovis R Burnham M Storm R Edwards J Edelman K Andes P Burns B Walters Y Chen F Kimpel E Sullivan K Li C Culpepper J Rudd X Dang J Hwang S Gupta T Wysocki Fibertek Inc ID: 376370
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "High Efficiency Laser Designs for Airbor..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
High Efficiency Laser Designs for Airborne and Space-Based Lidar Applications
F. Hovis, R. Burnham, M. Storm, R. Edwards, J. Edelman, K. Andes, P. Burns, B. Walters, Y. Chen, F. Kimpel, E. Sullivan, K. Li, C. Culpepper, J. Rudd, X. Dang, J. Hwang, S. Gupta, T. Wysocki
Fibertek, Inc
Slide2
Presentation Overview
Approaches to high efficiency lasers
ICESat-2 class laser design overview
Bulk Nd solid-state
Hybrid bulk Nd solid-state/Yb fiber
High-efficiency, single-frequency ring laser development
NASA Phase 1 SBIR
Laser Vegetation Imaging System – Global Hawk (LVIS-GH) transmitter
Future design updatesSlide3
Fibertek Design Approaches
Diode-pumped, bulk solid-state 1 µm lasers
Transverse pumped
Well developed technology
Scaling to > 1 J/pulse, > 100 W demonstrated for fieldable systems
Maintaining M
2
< 1.5 a challenge at higher powers
True wall plug efficiencies have been limited to ~8%
End pumped
Well developed technology
Power scaling has been limited by pump sources
High brightness and power, fiber-coupled pump sources are a rapidly developing and enabling technology
COTS devices with > 100 W CW from 200 µm core fibers are readily available
True wall plug efficiencies of 15%-20% are possible
High efficiency is easier in low energy, high repetition rate systems
Fiber lasers
Ultimate high efficiency end pumped transmitters
Kilowatts of high beam quality have been demonstrated in CW lasers
High brightness and power, fiber-coupled pump sources are a rapidly developing and enabling technology
Energy scaling is key challengeSlide4
ICESat-2 Laser Requirements
Parameter
ATLAS Laser Transmitter
Wavelength
532 ± 1 nm
Pulse Energy
1 mJ, adjustable from 300-1000 µJ
Pulse Energy Stability
10% RMS over 1 sPulsewidth< 1.5 nsRepetition Rate10 ±0.3 kHzLinewidth/Wavelength Stability85% transmission through 30 pm filterPolarization Extinction Ratio> 100:1Spatial ModeM2 < 1.6, GaussianBeam Diameter15 mm limiting apertureBeam Divergence< 108 µradPointing Stability (shot-to-shot)< 21.6 µrad (RMS) over 1 sPointing Stability (long-term)< 100 µradLifetime5 years plus 60 days on orbitMass20 kgVolume (cm)< 50(L) x 30(W) x 15(H)Wall plug efficiency>5% for 800 µJ – 1000 µJ energies
Original Laser Support Engineering Services (LSES) contract was to support rebuild of original ICESat laser for ICESat-2
1064 nm
50 mJ/pulse
50 Hz
After LSES award the ICESat-2 design transitioned to micro-pulse lidar approach updatesSlide5
Bulk Solid State Transmitter
Design Overview
Considered multiple design options
All bulk solid-state
All fiber
Hybrid
Fiber front end
Final bulk solid state amp
Final choice was schedule drivenNeed a TRL 6 laser by February 2011Settled on all bulk solid-state approachShort pulse Nd:YVO4 oscillatorNd:YVO4 preampNd:YVO4 power ampHigh brightness 880 nm fiber coupled pump diodesBetter mode overlapLower thermal loadingTransmitter Optical Schematic532 nm outputSlide6
Short Pulse Oscillator
Nd:YVO
4
gain medium
Nd:YVO4 is more efficient
1 ns pulses can be achieved in Nd:YVO4 at fluences well below optical damage thresholds
Relatively high absorption at 880 nm
Short linear cavity with electro-optic Q-switch
< 1.5 ns pulsewidthLow timing jitterHigh brightness 880 nm fiber coupled pump diodesBetter overlap with TEMoo modeLower thermal effects than 808 nmEOQ-Switch
Conduction Cooled
Diode Array
Pump Source
Composite YVO
4
rod with HR
Fiber
Coupling
Optics
/4
Output coupler
1 µm polarizer
880 nm HRSlide7
Typical Short Pulse Oscillator
Performance
Beam profile at output coupler
X diameter = 291 µm
Y diameter = 295 µm
Parameter
Laser Performance
Pulse Energy
146 µJPulse Energy Stability2.7% RMS over 1 sPulse Width.98 nsRepetition Rate10 kHzPulse Interval Stability< 0.01 µsCenter Wavelength (IR)1064.14 nmSpatial ModeM2x - 1.2, M2y - 1.2Pointing Stability (shot-to-shot)0.43% of divergence Pointing Stability (1 hour)0.53% of divergenceSlide8
Oscillator 1064nm Linewidth
Oscillator is linewidth narrowed
Analyzer etalon resolution is 4.9 pm8 mm etalon
Reflectivity finesse 14
Linewidth = 5.9 pm
8Slide9
Oscillator/Preamp Results
M
2
= 1.3
Total output energy – 470 µJ
Extracted energy – 357 µJ
Pump power @ 10kHz 14.5 W
Optical to optical efficiency 24.6%Slide10
Amplifier 1064 nm Performance
Most sensitive parameter is pump/seed overlap
Mode matching in amplifier is key to high efficiencySlide11
Bulk Solid State Output vs. Total Diode Pump PowerSlide12
Bulk Solid-State Optical to Optical Efficiency vs. Total Diode Pump PowerSlide13
Bulk Solid-State 532nm Beam Quality vs. Amp Pump Power
Amp pump
Power
(W)
532 nm laser power
M
x
2
My24012.61.1841.2724012.61.1421.1793210.51.091.1247.61.191.1164.51.031.0482.21.0151.032Beam quality improves at lower amp pump powersSlide14
532nm Laser Power (W)
M
x2
M
y
2
12.9
1.11
1.097.31.111.145.61.101.13M2 data at 532 nm with P=12.9WBeam at focus at 532nm with P=12.9WBulk Solid-State 532 nm Beam Quality vs. OutputPower Varied by Amp DelaySlide15
Solid State Brassboard Full Transmitter
Performance Summary
Laser meets specifications for Energy: achieved 12.9W at 532nm68% conversion efficiency from 1064nm to 532nm in LBO
532nm Laser energy can be tuned with 2 methods:
Adjust power amplifier pump power
Adjust timing between Q-sitch pulse and amplifiers.
Constant input power
Data shows NO change in divergence or pointing.
532 nm beam quality: ~ 1.2532 nm pulsewidth: <1.3ns532 nm linewidth: <16 pm with etalon OCInstrument limitedFully linewidth narrowed oscillator not yet incorporatedPointing stability at 1064nm: 2% of the divergenceSlide16
Bulk Nd Solid State vs. Hybrid
Hybrid
AdvantagesSingle frequency with DFB/DBR stability
Pulse width selectable, 300 ps to 1.5 ns
High pulse format flexibility
Extremely stable T
o
triggering
Fibertek environmental data looks very goodUse of bulk solid state amp allows easy energy scalingChallengesYb Parts supply chain is immature.Very select vendors produce good parts in any reliable manner.High parts countBulk solid state Nd LaserAdvantagesMature technology - supply chain, materials selections, cleaning & bake out proceduresClear design margin identification and optical damage design rulesSimplest and lowest cost to produce.Smaller and lower weightChallengesLinewidth not single frequency BUT has substantial optical damage margin and can get high transmission through 30 pm etalon (532 nm)Slide17
Yb Fiber-MOPA Architecture
Multi-stage 1-
mm pulsed seeder
–
B
ased on established architecture at Fibertek
Uses COTS fiber-optics only
Final stage amplification to 300-400 uJ/pulse
1064nm Seed2X 6/125mm YDFA10/125mm YDFA30/250mm YDFAend-cap400uJ(4W)10uJ(0.1W)0.1nJ (1uW)1 nsec/10kHzpulse-carving500nJ (5mW)100mw cw1-mm Pulsed Seeder (1nsec/10kHz)M Z MAOMSlide18
Yb Fiber Temporal Waveforms
3
rd
stage
Final stage
3.07 W average power demonstrated from final stage
900 ps pulseSlide19
Yb Fiber Beam Quality Measurement
M
2
~ 1.25 @ 300 µJ, 0.9 ns
M
2
x
= 1.10
M2y = 1.35Slide20
Hybrid Summary
Successfully demonstrated all fiber amplifier front end
All work done with residual in-house fibers300 µJ0.9 ns
M
2
~ 1.3
Final bulk amplifier demonstrated
19 W output for 5 W input @ 10 kHz
M2 ~ 1.3Need to increase fiber front end to 500 µJ Achievable with new custom fiberNot compatible with ICESat-2 schedulePromising approach for future systemsSlide21
High-Efficiency, Single-Frequency Ring Laser Development
Synthesis of other Fibertek development work
High efficiency bulk solid-state gain media
Single- frequency ring lasers
Robust packing designs for field applications
Appropriate design for longer pulsewidth applications
≥ 3 ns
Lidar systems for winds, clouds, aerosols, vegetation canopy, ozone, ……..
Initial work supported by NASA Phase 1 SBIRPhase 1 SBIR led to contract for Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor – Global Hawk (LVIS-GH) lidar transmitterBrassboard short pulse ring oscillator1064 nm output End pumped Nd:YVO4 or Nd:YAGFiber coupled 880 nm pump1064 nm output Slide22
40 cm Cavity Nd:YAG Results
Nd:YAG has better storage efficiency but lower gain
230 µs lifetime
Longer pulsewidths
Thermal effects limited initial repetition rate scaling tests
Pulse pumping improves efficiency
Highest energy results summarySlide23
40 cm Cavity Nd:YVO
4
ResultsNd:YVO
4
has lower storage efficiency but higher gain
100 µs lifetime
Higher absorption
Shorter pulsewidths
Reduced thermal effects relative to Nd:YAG1% doping gave slightly higher efficiencies35% optical to optical efficiency1 mJ/pulseScalable to at least 8 kHz (8 W average power)M2 = 1.1Highest energy results for 120 W peak pumping880 nm pumping results @ 2500 HzNear field output beam profile M2 dataM2 = 1.1Slide24
Approach for LVIS-GH
Requirements
1.5 mJ
3-6 ns
2500 Hz
Approach
Nd:YVO
4
Higher efficiencyShorter pulse width30 cm cavity LVIS-GH requires 3-6 ns pulsewidthDual compartment sealed canisterLow distortion in high altitude environmentDerived from TWiLiTE designBrassboard results2500 Hz1.7 mJ4.3 ns pulse width30 cm cavity optimization results for 120 W peak pumpingSlide25
Future Work
Proposed as a NASA Phase 2 SBIR
Injection seeding
Modified ramp & fire approach
Scale to > 2 kHz
Power scaling
End pumped amplifier
Derived from ICESat-2 and Phase 1 designs
Field hardened packagingSealed for high altitude useDual compartmentSeparate electronics moduleSuitable for multiple near and longer term applicationsHSRL 1 transmitter replacementHurricane & Severe Storm Sentinel transmitterNext generation aerosol lidarsPump for methane lidarPump for ozone lidarSlide26
Acknowledgements
Support for this work was provided by Goddard Space Flight Center through the Laser System Services Engineering contract and the NASA SBIR office.