International Summit of Human Gene Editing

International Summit of Human Gene Editing International Summit of Human Gene Editing - Start

2018-10-29 5K 5 0 0

International Summit of Human Gene Editing - Description

December 2, 2015 . Gary E. Marchant, Ph.D., J.D. . g. ary.marchant@asu.edu. Human Gene Editing: International Governance. Arguments for International Governance. International standards assure equal protection for citizens of all nations. ID: 701145 Download Presentation

Download Presentation

International Summit of Human Gene Editing




Download Presentation - The PPT/PDF document "International Summit of Human Gene Editi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.



Presentations text content in International Summit of Human Gene Editing

Slide1

International Summit of Human Gene EditingDecember 2, 2015 Gary E. Marchant, Ph.D., J.D. gary.marchant@asu.edu

Human Gene Editing: International Governance

Slide2

Arguments for International GovernanceInternational standards assure equal protection for citizens of all nationsUniform national requirements discourage medical tourismInternational standards provide consistent requirements for companies and scientists in the fieldHarmonized national standards prevent trade disputes (eg GMOs)

Prevent “race to the bottom” or “risk havens”Regulators benefit from economies of scale and sharing resources and workload

Slide3

Different social, political, and ethical norms in different countriesDifferent national approaches allows for experimentation on different governance approachesLarge resources, time and effort needed to create international standards might be better utilized in developing national oversightComplete agreement and compliance by all nations highly unlikelyArguments Against International Governance

Slide4

Timing of International vs. National StandardsFrancis Fukuyama:“[R]egulation cannot work in a globalized world unless it is global in scope. Nonetheless, national-level regulation must come first. Effective regulation almost never starts at an international level ….” Foreign Policy, Mar/Apr 2002.But developing national regulations first may:

unduly delay international regimebe more difficult in the face of entrenched and inconsistent national regulations (e.g., GMOs)

Slide5

Slide6

Breggin et al., London School of Economics (2009)

Mechanisms of International Convergence

Slide7

Negotiation of international treaty requires enormous commitment of resources, time and political capitale.g., climate changeIrresoluble compliance and enforcement challengese.g., Biological Weapons ConventionTraditional “Hard Law”: Treaties and Other Formal Agreements

Slide8

Treaty Precedent: UN International Cloning ConventionIn 2001, the U.N. General Assembly established an Ad Hoc Committee to draft an international convention to prohibit human reproductive cloning The Human Cloning ban deadlocked in the U.N. in December 2003 due to disagreement

U.N. Legal Committee discussed ban again in Oct. 2004; again failed to reach agreementKey points of disagreement:

Scope

Duration

Enforcement

Slide9

“Transnational New Governance”Originates from “soft law” concept in international lawSubstantive obligations and requirements created by instruments that are not directly legally enforceable

International scope/focus/participationBroadening oversight from top-down government requirements to include a much broader range of decision-makers

e.g., companies,

researchers, NGOs

, public-private partnerships,

other third

parties

Slide10

Advantages of Transnational New GovernanceVoluntary; cooperativeReflexiveCan be adopted or revised relatively quicklyMany different approaches can be tried simultaneouslyCan be gradually “hardened” into more formal regulatory oversight

Slide11

Limitations of Transactional New GovernanceNorms/standards not directly enforceableRisk of “whitewashing” or “greenwashing”Participation limitationsNot always as flexible and adaptable as hopedPotential for confusion/overlapLess legitimacy

Slide12

Examples of Transnational New Governance Tools & ExamplesTransnational regulatory dialogue and networksOECD working GroupsInternational regulatory harmonization committeesInternational Conference on HarmonizationUnited Nations DeclarationsUNESCO International Declaration on Human Genetic Data

International principlesWorld Medical Association/Helsinki PrinciplesInternational Scientific Assessment bodiesIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Professional society guidelinesISSCR Guidelines for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

International statements of policy

HUGO statements

Private/industry standards

IGSC Harmonized Screening Protocol

Framework conventions

Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Slide13


About DocSlides
DocSlides allows users to easily upload and share presentations, PDF documents, and images.Share your documents with the world , watch,share and upload any time you want. How can you benefit from using DocSlides? DocSlides consists documents from individuals and organizations on topics ranging from technology and business to travel, health, and education. Find and search for what interests you, and learn from people and more. You can also download DocSlides to read or reference later.