PDF-Interrogation Zone Basics.............................................

030789735040CH03qxd 42406 1237 PM Page 37 Chapter 3 RFIDreaderDepending on the specific application interrogators and antennas are configured. 500 400 475 575 775 875 1450 1600 450 575 625 825 925 1550 1700 1000 600 675 800 1025 1175 2050 2200 650 775 850 1075 1225 2150 2300 1500 800 875 1025 1275 1475 2650 2800 850 975 1075 1325 1525 2750 2900 2000 1000 1075 1250 1525 1775 3250 3400 1050 1 Know your rights. . Review from Boring Thursday. Sources of law: statutes.. Sources of law: judge made law.. Judges write opinions and those opinions are “law.”. Stare . decisis. . . We inherited this judge-made law from merry old England. . : . Gamification. of . Police Interrogation. P2 – WP3. Human Media Interaction . KLPD / Police Academy. Aims. Build . artificial . conversational . characters. . that can play the role of a suspect/witness in a police interrogation.. Correctional Services. Copyright and Terms of Service. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, 2011. These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of TEA, except under the following conditions:. Introduction. Security Interviews And Security Interrogations. . Legal Issues. Policy. Contrast Security Interviews and Interrogations. Preparation. Appointments. Location is key. The Main Goal. Compare Security Interviews and Interrogations. averted . During the eclipse, Mark . averted. his eyes from the sun.. If you averted your eyes, you looked away from something instead of directly at it.. fury. Fury is extremely strong anger.. When Jack didn’t get his way, he stomped out of the room in a . Describe the difference between and interview and an interrogation.. Process . Police officer should always control the conversation. Yes and No question, simple response- give clearer and more accurate details of the incident. Recognising Faces. Factors Affecting . Identification. Cognitive Interview. Detecting Lies. Interrogation. Techniques. False Confessions. Top-down. Typology (FBI). Bottom-up. Approach (Canter). Case Study. Recognising Faces. Factors Affecting . Identification. Cognitive Interview. Detecting Lies. Interrogation. Techniques. False Confessions. Top-down. Typology (FBI). Bottom-up. Approach (Canter). Case Study. Interviewing witnesses and suspects. Ethical interviewing. Ethical interviewing. Police have historically made a distinction between . interviewing. (an attempt to obtain useful information from a witness) and . Course Objectives. Difference between Interview and Interrogation. How to conduct an interview. Eyewitness ID procedures. How to conduct an interrogation. Electronic recording requirements. Factors that lead to false confessions. Date:. Time in effect. From:. Time in effect. To:. . Population. (approx.). No. of. Dwellings (approx.). Evacuation Centre. Option 1. Evacuation Centre. Option 2. Evacuation Routes. 563. 201. Caboolture Memorial Hall. The Primary Time and Frequency Standard for the United States. http://tf.nist.gov/cesium/fountain.htm. f. = 9,192,631,770 Hz. T ~ 10. -6. K . T. he base unit of time is officially defined as "the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom".. Miranda and You! John Hascall & April O’Loughlin We are talking about Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 Not Lin-Manuel Miranda or Miranda Lambert Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona held- under