/
Immanuel Immanuel

Immanuel - PowerPoint Presentation

lois-ondreau
lois-ondreau . @lois-ondreau
Follow
439 views
Uploaded On 2015-11-20

Immanuel - PPT Presentation

Kant Deontological Ethics Kant Rejects Utilitarianism Does not deny that we seek pleasure and avoid pain but rejects the notion that pleasure and pain are our sovereign masters Instead emphasizes our autonomy freedom and rationality because it is these which render dignity to each pers ID: 200042

good act imperatives universal act good universal imperatives person categorical hypothetical reason autonomy freedom law action dignity interest heteronomy

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Immanuel" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

ImmanuelKant

Deontological EthicsSlide2

Kant Rejects Utilitarianism

Does not deny that we seek pleasure and avoid pain, but rejects the notion that pleasure and pain are our

sovereign

masters.

Instead emphasizes our autonomy (freedom) and rationality, because it is these which render dignity to each person, and dignity demands respect. Slide3

Kant’s Conception of Freedom

Autonomy

To act freely

To act according to a law I give myself

Heteronomy

To act according to desires I haven’t chosen myselfSlide4

Kant’s Conception of Morality

The moral worth of an action depends upon motive, i.e. doing the right thing for the right reasonSlide5

“A good will isn’t good because of what it effects or accomplishes, it’s good in itself. Even if by utmost effort the good will accomplishes nothing it would still shine like a jewel for its own sake as something which has its full value in itself.”

Immanuel KantSlide6

Three Contrasts

Morality

Motives: Duty versus Inclination

Freedom

Determination of Autonomy versus

Will: Heteronomy

Reason

Imperatives: Categorical versus

HypotheticalSlide7

Categorical vs. Hypothetical Imperatives

Hypothetical imperatives are generally distinguished by being a) interest or goal related; b) avoidable; and c) individualized, not universal

.

Categorical Imperatives are commands which are independent of an individual person’s interests or goals and are hence a) not interest or goal related; b) unavoidable; and c) universal

.Slide8

Formula of the Universal Law

act only on that maxim

(a rule or principle that gives reason to your action)

that you can will as a universal law.”Slide9

Formula of humanity as an end

“Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.”