PDF-in 1978. The Courts decisions in the Michigan cases
Author : luanne-stotts | Published Date : 2016-06-29
1 2 were closely watched for several reasonstime was decided affirmative action w 1 Regents of the Univ of Cal v Bakke 438 US 265 1978 2 Grutter v Bollinger 539
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "in 1978. The Courts decisions in t..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
in 1978. The Courts decisions in the Michigan cases: Transcript
1 2 were closely watched for several reasonstime was decided affirmative action w 1 Regents of the Univ of Cal v Bakke 438 US 265 1978 2 Grutter v Bollinger 539 US 306 2003 upho. RESTRAINT. Definition. Examples. Picture. Court Cases. Judicial Restraint. Judicial Restraint. Definition. Judges should always try to decide on cases on the basis of:. . 1. The original intent of those who wrote the constitution.. Professor Matthew Sag. Loyola University of Chicago School of Law. August 2015. Photo . Credit. : Neville . Nel. , “What’s The Point?. ” Taken on August 25, 2014. . https://www.flickr.com/photos/nevilleslens/14843388120/. Essential Questions. Why a national judiciary?. What purpose does the judicial branch serve?. What are the procedures of the Supreme Court?. How do cases reach the Supreme Court?. How does the Supreme Court operate?. Measuring the Legal Importance of. Supreme Court Precedents. James H. Fowler. UCSD. Timothy R. Johnson (Minn.). James F. Spriggs II (. WashU). Sangick Jeon (. Stanford). Paul J. Wahlbeck (GWU). U.S. Supreme Court is Institutionally Weak. The judicial branch interprets the laws (makes decisions using the laws.). The judicial branch is made up of . Court . Judges ELECTED OFFICIALS. Juries Everyday citizens.. They hear civil and criminal cases . Ch. 12. We begin at the Supreme Court because…. Original jurisdiction. We don’t!. Majority of cases are appellant jurisdiction. Writ of certiorari . (. sersh. -oh-rare-. ee. ) . - send up the records for review!. Characteristics of the Federal Court System. Adversarial. A court provides an arena for two parties to bring their conflicts before an impartial arbiter, or judge.. The plaintiff brings a charge.. The defendant is the one being charged.. Part Two. . by Annette Demers . BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. Judicial . decision = public record. Majority . are . “unreported” . (only found at the . registry . office). Judicial Decisions. Emma Kimball. Precedent. Definition:. An earlier event or action regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.. Court case decisions have the ability to impact all further decisions relating to a particular topic.. Part Two. . by Annette Demers . BA LLB MLIS. Judicial Decisions. -judicial decision = public record. -majority are unreported (only found at the . registry . office). Judicial Decisions. -the Supreme Court . Divided into 2 levels. Federal Courts. State Courts. There are 94 Federal District courts. Have original jurisdiction over cases involving Constitutional law, Federal officers, treaties, and maritime law.. Basic Facts. Only court set up by the Constitution.. Consists of 9 Justices. One Chief Justice . Eight Associates. President Appoints, Senate Confirms. Term. Supreme Court works 9 months/year.. Begins 1. Amy Semet, Princeton University. Questions. What political, sociological, legal and economic factors impact appellate court decision-making?. When do appellate court judges defer to adjudicative agencies?. 2022. Shona Smith, MPH. MDHHS Tuberculosis Epidemiologist. 2023. . MDHHS. . World. . TB. . Day. March. . 24,. . 2023. Disclosure. No. . one. . involved. . in. . the. . planning or. . presentation of.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"in 1978. The Courts decisions in the Michigan cases"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents