/
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Pharmacodynamic Effects of

Pharmacodynamic Effects of - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
394 views
Uploaded On 2016-07-01

Pharmacodynamic Effects of - PPT Presentation

Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y 12 Receptor Mediated Signaling in Prasugrel Treated Patients Fabiana Rollini Francesco Franchi Antonio TelloMontoliu Ronakkumar Patel Andrew Darlington ID: 385880

cangrelor prasugrel platelet 001 prasugrel cangrelor 001 platelet baseline reactivity anova vasp patients results pharmacodynamic vitro index day pri

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Pharmacodynamic Effects of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y12 Receptor Mediated Signaling in Prasugrel Treated Patients

Fabiana Rollini, Francesco Franchi, Antonio Tello-Montoliu, Ronakkumar Patel, Andrew Darlington, José Luis Ferreiro, Jung Rae Cho, Ana Muniz-Lozano, Bhaloo Desai, Martin M. Zenni, Luis A. Guzman, Theodore A. Bass and Dominick J. Angiolillo.

University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA

JACC

Cardiovasc

Interv

. 2014 Apr;7(4):426-34.Slide2

Authors and disclosuresThe present study was funded by a grant from The Medicines Company. The study was designed and undertaken by the investigators who had final responsibility for the decision to publish these results.Dominick J. Angiolillo: Received payment as an individual for: a) Consulting fee or honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Merck, Evolva, Abbott Vascular and PLx Pharma; b) Participation in review activities from Johnson & Johnson, St. Jude, and Sunovion. Institutional payments for grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis,

Glaxo Smith Kline, Otsuka, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Evolva, Gilead; and has other financial relationships with Esther and King Biomedical Research Grant.José Luis Ferreiro: reports honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly Co; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Astra Zeneca.Theodore A. Bass: has received research funds (paid to Institution) from Baxter.All other authors have not disclosures to report.Slide3

BACKGROUND Despite the more rapid and potent levels of platelet inhibition achieved compared with clopidogrel, pharmacodynamic studies have shown interindividual variability in prasugrel effects (1-5)In particular, delayed antiplatelet effects and high rates of high on platelete reactivity

have been shown especially in the early hours after prasugrel administration in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI (6,7)The use of orally administered antiplatelet agents may be challenging in patients unable to swallow (e.g. patients sedated, intubated, in shock, or those with nausea or vomiting)These observations support the need for intravenous antiplatelet therapies able to yield more prompt and potent platelet inhibitory effects, which are unlikely to be achieved with oral medications (5) Cangrelor, is a potent intravenous direct-acting and reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist which has shown to reduce ischemic complications, including stent thrombosis, in P2Y12 inhibitor naïve patients undergoing PCI (8,9)

1

)

Alexopoulos

D et al.

Curr

Pharm Des.

2013;19:5121-6;

2

)

Bonello

L et

al. J Am

Coll

Cardiol

.

2011;58:467-73;

3

)

Alexopoulos

D et al.

Int

J

Cardiol

.

2012;154:333-4

;

4

)Ferreiro JL et al.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

2013;6:182-4

;

5

)Ferreiro

JL et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv.

2012;5:433-45

;

6

)Alexopoulos

D et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv.

2012;5:797-804

;

7

)Parodi

G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.

2013;61:1601-6;

8

)Bhatt

DL et al. N Engl J Med.

2013;368:1303-13;

9

)Steg

PG et al. Lancet.

2013;382:1981-92.Slide4

STUDY AIMThe aim of this prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic investigation was to assess by whole blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) the in vitro effects of cangrelor on platelets from patients with coronary artery disease on maintenance prasugrel 10mg/day therapy

treated with two reloading dose (30mg or 60mg) regimens.PRIMARY END-POINTThe primary endpoint of the study was the comparison between PRI before and after in vitro incubation with cangrelor at baseline, while patients were on maintenance prasugrel 10mg/day. Slide5

Inclusion criteria:Age between 18 and 74 years oldaspirin (81 mg/day) and prasugrel (10 mg/day) for at least 14 daysstable coronary artery disease

Exclusion criteria:age ≥ 75 years oldactive bleedingprior cerebrovascular eventbody weight < 60 kgclinical instability after the index eventuse of oral anticoagulationplatelet count < 100x106/µl

hemoglobin <10 g/dl

creatinine

> 2

mg/dl

hepatic enzymes >2.5 times the upper limit of

normal

pregnant and lactating females

STUDY POPULATION

Slide6

STUDY DESIGN

Patients on aspirin (81 mg/day) and prasugrel (10mg/day) ≥ 14 days post-PCI

Prasugrel

30 mg

Reload

Prasugrel

60

mg

Reload

Pharmacodynamic

testing:

1

hour

Pharmacodynamic

testing:

Baseline

Pharmacodynamic

testing:

4 hours

Pharmacodynamic testing

(VASP) with

and without

in vitro

cangrelor

500

nMSlide7

PLATELET FUNCTION TESTWhole blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)The VASP assay was used to determine the platelet reactivity index (PRI) according to standard protocols . VASP was performed before and after in vitro incubation with 500 nM

cangrelor at each time point. In brief, VASP phosphorylation (VASP-P) was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies (Biocytex Inc, Marseille, France). A reduced PRI is indicative of greater inhibition of the P2Y12 signalling pathway. Slide8

STATISTICAL ANALYSISConformity to the normal distribution was evaluated for continuous variables with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov testChi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (if expected value in any cell was fewer than 5) were used to compare categorical variables between two groupsA repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to evaluate intra-group comparisons and the overall difference between groups, using Bonferroni approach to correct for multiple comparisonsAn analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method with a general linear model, using the baseline value of platelet reactivity as a covariate, was used to evaluate all between-groups comparisons

A 2-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference for all the analyses performedSlide9

RESULTS (1)Baseline CharacteristicsSlide10

RESULTS (2)Comparison of platelet reactivity values between 30 mg and 60 mg prasugrel re-loading dose in the absence of cangrelor

Baseline1 hour4 hours

Prasugrel

30 mg

Prasugrel

60 mg

p=0.481

p=0.001

Prasugrel

30 mg

Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001

Baseline

vs

1hr p<0.001

Baseline

vs

4hrs p<0.001

1hr

vs

4hrs p=0.065

Prasugrel

60 mg

Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001

Baseline

vs

1hr p<0.001

Baseline

vs

4hrs p<0.001

1hr vs

4hrs p=0.001

Platelet Reactivity Index %

ANOVA p=0.935Slide11

RESULTS (3)Comparison of platelet reactivity values between 30 mg and 60 mg prasugrel re-loading dose in the presence of cangrelor

Baseline + cangrelor

1 hour

4 hours

Prasugrel

30

mg +

cangrelor

Prasugrel

60

mg +

cangrelor

p=0.604

p=0.334

Platelet Reactivity Index %

ANOVA p=0.373

Prasugrel

30 mg +

cangrelor

Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001

Baseline

vs

1h p=0.002

Baseline

vs

4

hs

p<0.001

1h

vs

4hs p=0.401

Prasugrel

60 mg +

cangrelor

Intragroup ANOVA p=0.001

Baseline

vs

1hr p=0.124

Baseline

vs

4

hrs

p=0.005

1

hr

vs

4

hrs

p=0.016Slide12

RESULTS (4)p<0.001

p=0.013p=0.001ANOVA p=0.001

Platelet Reactivity Index %

Comparison of

PRI

expressed as

percentages

measured by VASP

across time points

in the

prasugrel

30 mg reload group in presence and absence of

cangrelorSlide13

RESULTS (5)Comparison of PRI expressed as percentages measured by VASP across time points in the

prasugrel 60 mg reload group in presence and absence of cangrelorp<0.001p=0.002p=0.325

ANOVA p<0.001

Platelet Reactivity Index %Slide14

Baseline + cangrelor

1 hour4 hoursΔ Platelet Reactivity Index %

p

>0.999

p

>0.999

ANOVA p=0.290

Prasugrel

60

mg +

cangrelor

Prasugrel

30

mg +

cangrelor

RESULTS

(6)

Absolute change or delta (Δ) between

PRI

values in the absence and presence of

cangrelor

in each arm (30 mg and 60 mg

prasugrel

re-load)Slide15

CONCLUSIONS In vitro cangrelor is associated with enhanced platelet inhibition when added to platelets of patients on prasugrel maintenance therapy as well as when exposed to a reloading dosePlatelet inhibitory effects of in vitro

cangrelor are immediate and faster than prasugrel reloading aloneComparable levels of platelet reactivity to that achieved with in vitro cangrelor were observed only 4 hours after a 60 mg prasugrel reloading doseRollini F. et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):426-34