PPT-Readability

Combinatoria l Pattern Matching CPM June 29 2015 Rayan Chikhi CNRS Lille Sofya Raskhodnikova Penn State Paul Medvedev Penn State Martin Milanič University of Primorska. Readability Scores What is a readability score? A readability score is the grade level you need to have completed to be able to read the text. Pros and Cons of Readability Formulas Are text-based . Datang. 欢. 迎. Vaazhga. Welcome. Professor David Wray. University of Warwick,. United Kingdom. Dr Dahlia . Janan. Universiti. . Pendidikan. Sultan . Idris. , Malaysia. Many thanks for coming to today’s meeting. research . on readability in Malay Language . Dr. Dahlia . Janan. Research title:. Matching text to reader: exploring a new model of readability for Malay language . texts. Funded by: . Research Acculturation Grants (RAGS). What is Readability?. A characteristic of text documents... “the sum total of all those elements within a given piece of printed material that affect the success . of a . group of readers have with it. . with Fry’s Readability Graph… What numbers do I use? 1. Randomly select three 100-word segments of 2. Count the number of syllables in each 100-word block and calculate the average. 3. C its use at NIU. Presidential Commission on Persons with Disabilities. Advise the President. Promote accessibility. Collaborate and advocate. PCPD’s Mission. Language Influences Perception. “. Accessibility. Calculating the readability of a text. You have been asked to analyze a piece of writing, considering (among other things) its readability. How can you calculate the ease with which it can be read?. Prepared for SSAC by. Gerd M . Flodgren. What. Works Global . Summit. London 26-28 September 2016. Interactive Health . Literacy. Framework. HEALTH. LITERACY. Skills and . abilities. Demands. and . complexity. . Interactive health literacy . Cody Dunne and Ben Shneiderman. Human-Computer Interaction Lab & . Department of Computer Science. University of Maryland. Contact: cdunne@cs.umd.edu. 26. th. Annual Human-Computer Interaction Lab Symposium. l Pattern Matching (CPM). June . 29. , . 2015. Rayan. . Chikhi. , CNRS Lille. Sofya. . Raskhodnikova. , Penn State. Paul Medvedev, Penn State. Martin . Milanič. , University of . Primorska. Overlap Digraph (definition). . Ch.. 6, . Slide . 1. Chapter 6. Revising Business Messages. Business Communication:. Process and Product, 8e. Mary Ellen . Guffey. & Dana Loewy. Taking Time to Revise: Applying Phase 3 of the Writing Process. Eliminate flabby expressions.. Revising Tips. Wordy. Concise. at this point in time. now. due to the fact that. because. in very few cases. seldom. despite the fact that. although. feel free to. please. Some Quick numbers. 21,774,931 . user. sessions. 70% . of users were on the site for . less . than10 seconds. 66% of users . viewed . one page then . left. 82% of users . viewed . two or fewer . pages and then left. Sandra Aluisio. 1. , Lucia Specia. 2. , . Caroline Gasperin. 1. , . Carolina . Scarton. 1. 1. University of São Paulo, Brazil. 2. University . of . Wolverhampton. , UK. The 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications.