Presented by Tracy R Johnson CPC 2015 Mobile Alabama Chapter VicePresident Objectives Introduction on the Importance of Clear Documentation CPT Coding Audits Diagnosis Audits Denial Audits ID: 674014
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The MEAT of Documentation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The MEAT of Documentation
Presented by:
Tracy R. Johnson, CPC
2015 Mobile Alabama Chapter Vice-PresidentSlide2
Objectives:
Introduction on the Importance of Clear Documentation
CPT Coding Audits
Diagnosis Audits
Denial Audits
Compliance using 1995/1997 Coding Guidelines
What is the difference in Acute and Chronic Conditions?
What is CERT?
What is Risk Adjustment?
The MEAT of the DocumentationSlide3
The Importance of Clear Detailed Documentation
There are multiple types of audits that can be used in a tool today to gauge many different aspects of the coding realm
CPT Coding Audits: Audits that strictly take into account the accuracy of the procedural coding on a chart
Diagnosis Audits: Audits that strictly take into account the accuracy of the diagnostic coding on the chart. This is also used to establish Hierarchy of Coding (HCC) during an audit.
Denial Audits: Audits that are used to gauge the accuracy of a denial from the insurance company as to why the claim was deniedSlide4
CPT Audits
The following rules apply when auditing for Evaluation and Management during a CPT Audit
Which set of guidelines are in the “Compliance File”? Are they 1995 guidelines or 1997 guidelines?
What are the requirements for both?
In the 1995 E/M Coding Guidelines, the Evaluation and Management is based on 3 Key components (History, Examination, and Medical Decision Making)
In the 1997 E/M Coding Guidelines, the Evaluation and Management is based on a clear and documented “Extent of the Examination that was performed citing all 14 Review of Systems, and time is more a factor for 1997 Coding Guidelines than in 1995 Coding GuidelinesSlide5
IMPORTANCE OF THE AUDIT TOOL
You may be asking yourself, “Why is an Audit Tool Important”?
Here are a few detailed reasons why:
To establish compliance of not only the coder but the physician
To establish documentation guidelines within the office/hospital setting
To establish the need for further education (staff, physicians,
etc
)
To establish a “base-line” as to where all other audits will be based
To establish the identify of Medical Necessity in the overall criteria in payment in addition to the specific technical requirements of a CPT codeSlide6
THE ELEMENTS OF AN AUDIT TOOL
There are 5 Basic Elements to an Audit Tool
Condition: Statement that describes the results of an audit
Criteria: Standards used to measure the activity or performance of the auditee
Cause: Explanation of why a problem occurred
Effect: The difference between and significance of the condition and the criteria
Recommendation: Action that must be taken to correct the courseSlide7
What is CERT?
CERT stands for
Comprehensive Error Rate Testing
Contractors are to statistically analyze and establish error rates
Estimates improper payments
Claims are randomly selected for review
Not required to notify providers of the intention to start a reviewSlide8
Medicare Appeals Process
The Appeals Process contains 5 steps
Level 1: Redetermination by a Medicare Contractor
Level 2: Reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor
Level 3: Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge
Level 4: Review by the Appeals Council
Level 5: Judicial Review in Federal District CourtSlide9
Payment Recovery/Recoupment
A Medicare Overpayment occurs when a provider receives excess payments due to any of the following:
Duplicate Submission of the same service or claim
Payment to the incorrect payee
Payment for excluded medically unnecessary services
A pattern of furnishing and billing for excessive non-covered services (as determined in an audit or review)Slide10
Defining “Chronic” versus “Acute”
What is the difference between Acute and Chronic Illnesses?
Acute Illnesses: Those illnesses that will eventually resolve without any medical supervision (colds, teething)
Example: An acute illness will typically run a course regardless of whether or not there is drug intervention; (coughs, colds, teething, PMS, sleeplessness) are all examples of such illnesses. Usually, medicine for acute illnesses are regulated as Over The Counter Drugs
Chronic Illnesses: Those that require medical supervision and is often a disease that has formed over a long period of time.
Examples: Cancer, AIDS, Kidney Disease and Diabetes. Usually medicines for chronic illnesses are regulated as prescription drugs.Slide11
What is Risk Adjustment?
Risk Adjustment is the model to adjust capitation payments to private health care plans for the health expenditure risk of their employees
CMS measures the disease burden that includes 70 HCC categories, which are correlated to diagnosis codes
CMS’ model is accumulative (patient can have more than one HCC category assigned to them)
Some categories override other categories
There is Hierarchy of Coding Categories (HCC)Slide12
HCC’s and How they Affect Payment
The following HCCs reflect a few common “chronic” conditions found within the Medicare population, that Medicare Advantage Plans look for to be documented in the patient’s chart:
Diabetes without complications
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Congestive Heart Failure
Breast Cancer
Ischemic Heart Disease
AnginaSlide13
HCC Guiding Principle
The Risk Adjustment diagnosis must be based on clinical medical record documentation from a face-to-face encounter
The Diagnosis must be coded according to the ICD-9-CM Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and assigned based on dates of service within the data collection period
The Diagnosis must be submitted to the MA organization from an appropriate Risk Adjustment provider type and an appropriate Risk Adjustment physician data sourceSlide14
Understanding Diagnosis Coding: Protect Against Auditor Scrutiny
Accurately Report ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Codes
Coders cannot assume the past medical history diagnosis has a current affect on the current condition for which the patient is receiving treatment
Unless the physician has a “
direct statement”
that the past medical condition or the medications the patient is taking for the past medical condition has a direct link on the treatment for the current encounter,
Coders should not code the past medical history conditions.Slide15
Understanding Diagnosis Coding: Protect Against Auditor Scrutiny
Capture All Chronic Diseases
Coders may report chronic diseases treated on an ongoing basis as many times as the patient is receiving treatment for the condition(s)
Code All Documented Conditions that Coexist
Code all documented conditions that coexist at the time of the encounter and require or affect the patient treatment or management
Do not code conditions that a physician previously treated and no longer existsSlide16
Understanding Diagnosis Coding: Protecting against Auditor Scrutiny
History Codes V10-V19-
Coders may use history codes (V10-V19) as secondary codes when the historical condition or family history has a direct effect on the current care
Replacement Codes – Coders may use the replacement codes as secondary codes to show that a patient has had a total knee or other joint replaced.
Medication V58 – Medication V codes help to support the use of several different medications like insulin, NSAIDS, or aspirin. Slide17
Handle Other Diagnoses and Consider Final Diagnostic Statements
For reporting purposes, the definition for other diagnoses is interpreted as additional conditions that affect patient care in terms of requiring one of the following:
Clinical Evaluation
Therapeutic Treatment
Diagnostic Procedures
Extended Length of Hospital Stay
Increased nursing care and/or monitoringSlide18
Handle Other Diagnoses and Consider Final Diagnostic Statements
Consider Final Diagnostic Statements
If the physician has included a diagnosis in the final diagnostic statement
Coders should ordinarily code it
However, some physicians include resolved conditions or diagnoses and status-post procedures from previous admissions or evaluations that have no bearing on the current episode in the diagnostic statement
Coders should not report these conditions
Examples:
A patient is a smoker but presents today for a sunburn (Use of tobacco not reported)
Parkinson’s disease in a patient with a wart on the finger (Parkinson’s not reported)
Depression in a patient who has fallen off a ladder (Depression not reported)
History of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in a patient that has a cold (Old MI not reported)Slide19
Now The MEATSlide20
MEAT
What is MEAT?
M: Monitoring
E: Evaluating
A: Assessing/Addressing
T: TreatingSlide21
Monitoring “M”
Monitoring is the application of all of the below in a medical record:
Signs
Symptoms
Disease Progression
Disease RegressionSlide22
Evaluating “E”
Evaluating is the application of all the below in a medical record:
Test results
Effectiveness of medications
Response to treatmentSlide23
Assessing/Addressing “A”
Assessing or Addressing is the application of all of the below in a Medical Record:
Ordering Tests
Discussion
Review of Records
CounselingSlide24
Treating “T”
Treating is the application of all the below in a Medical Record
Medications
Therapies
Other modalitiesSlide25
How Does My Documentation Stand UP?
According to CMS an acceptable problem list must show “evaluation and treatment” for EACH condition that relates to an ICD-9-CM code
Condition
ICD-9-CM Code
Documentation Supports
CHF
428.0
Symptoms well controlled on Lasix and ACE
inhibitor. Will continue to monitor
Major Depression
296.20
Despite
being on Zoloft 50 mg per day, the patient still feels hopelessness. Will raise to 100 mg for the next two weeks
Hypertension
401.9
Stable on medicationsSlide26
Documentation “PitFalls”
Providers are not showing all documentation for work performed during the encounter
It is acceptable to include “history of” conditions if it directly affects the current treatment plan of the patient
Remember, “stating history of” means the patient no longer has that conditionSlide27
In Summary…..
Any and each condition that is addressed at the time of the encounter should be documented in the History and Physical
Each condition that relates to an ICD-9 code must show evaluation and/or treatment
A list of diagnoses is NOT acceptable as evidence that the diagnosis affected the patient management
Using MEAT ensures that documentation is sufficient for CMS’s requirements for validating coding
Following the MEAT principle will provide accurate documentation, patient of care quality, and improvement in data management for validating diagnosis codesSlide28
Questions?Slide29
Thank you for Coming!
We hope you enjoyed tonight’s presentation
Please take a moment to fill out the Speaker Survey given to you at the start of the presentation
The power point will be available on the website
www.aapcmobile.com
within 24 hours
Remember, our next meeting
March 17, 2015
6:00 pm
Providence
Hosptial
, DePaul Center