/
U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-25

U.S. Department of Education - PPT Presentation

The Uniform Guidance Audit Requirements 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation you should Understand the role of audits in accountability Get an overview of how Single Audits are conducted and what they include ID: 733795

audits audit findings single audit audits single findings guidance uniform federal requirements program 200 key cfr risk impact grantees management agencies report

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "U.S. Department of Education" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

U.S. Department of Education

The Uniform GuidanceAudit Requirements – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart FSlide2

Learning Objectives

By the end of this presentation, you should:

Understand the role of audits in accountability

Get an overview of how Single Audits are conducted, and what they include

Learn the key changes in the Uniform Guidance relating to Single Audits, and their implications for ED and grantees

Know the timeline for implementation of changes

Be aware of available resources and trainingSlide3

Overview

AUDITS and SINGLE AUDITS

Current Requirements

I

ssues relating to audits

KEY CHANGES

Overview

Key Changes and their Impact

Timeline

RESOURCES

Slide4

Audits and Accountability

Audits are one of several tools available for assessing grantees’ performance and ensuring accountability. The information they yield is valuable because it is based on a

systematic process of objectively obtaining and assessing evidence to determine if

grantees’ actual programs or operations meet established criteria.

The

use of audit data is an important aspect of implementing the Department’s goal of improving program efficacy through comprehensive risk management and grant monitoringSlide5

Single Audits: Current Requirements, Basic Structure

Single Audits are the most widespread type of audits of Federal government programs.

Entities

that

expend a minimum (“threshold”) level of Federal

funds are subject to audit requirements that are commonly referred to as

Single Audits.

Single Audits:

Are authorized under the Single Audit Act, as amended in 1996, and OMB guidance

Use a risk-based approach to determine which Federal programs are covered

Combine a financial audit and a compliance audit into one reportSlide6

Single Audit Requirements: Threshold Determinations

Single Audits follow a specific approach in assessing compliance, using OMB guidance in Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and its Compliance Supplement. The audit has several steps:

Which programs to test. E

ach program is classified as major or not, depending on a sliding scale that is related to the total level of Federal expenditures, and a minimum threshold amount per program.

What is the risk level for each program

. The auditor determines what is the risk of noncompliance that could be material to the Federal program.

How much to test.

The extent of expenditures tested varies, according to the auditee’s risk level. Slide7

Single Audit Requirements: Audit Findings

Auditors are required to:Report instances of noncompliance relating to major programs identified in the OMB Compliance Supplement.

Report

questioned costs above a threshold.

Provide in their findings sufficient detail for the auditee to prepare a corrective action plan and implement it, and for Federal agencies and pass-through-entities to arrive at a management decision. Slide8

Single Audit Requirements: Audit Submission

The audit report is due to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) within nine months after the end of the entity’s fiscal period, or 30 days after the auditor provides the report to it, whichever is earlier.

The complete report package has several parts:

The Single Audit Data Collection Form

The Financial Statements and a supplementary Schedule of Expenditures of Financial Assistance (SEFA)

Auditor’s Report(s)

A Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings

A Corrective Action PlanSlide9

Single Audit Requirements: Audit Follow-Up

Federal agencies are required to

issue timely management decisions on findings

related to their

programs and to

ensure that grantees correct problems, and, as necessary, reimburse unallowable charges.

Non-federal entities passing through Federal funds to other organizations are also responsible for following up on findings in audits of their

subgrantees

.

A management decision on audit findings is due within

six months

after the audit report has been received by the FAC. Slide10

Single Audits: Common Issues

Over the years, the audit community and Federal agencies have been interested in: Improving the quality of Single Audits

Eliminating the

recurrence of findings among some auditees

Encouraging effective techniques in following up on audit findings and using audit

data in administering

grants

The Uniform Guidance address these issues.Slide11

Uniform Guidance: Key Changes

Four Broad Types of Changes in Audit Requirementsand their impact at ED and its granteesSlide12

Uniform Guidance: Overview

Prior to the issuance of the Uniform Guidance, the audit requirements relating to Single Audits were set forth in OMB Circular A-50, Audit Follow-up, OMB Circular A-133, and the Compliance Supplement to that Circular.

The audit requirements resulting from the Uniform Guidance are found at 2 CFR 200, Subpart F, and Appendix XI. Slide13

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

1. Strengthen oversight by focusing audits where

there is

greatest

risk of waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars

.

Increases audit

threshold from $

500,000

to $

750,000 (

2 CFR 200.501)

.

Gives more weight, in testing, to programs with high-risk audit findings in prior years (

2 CFR 200.518).

Raises

questioned cost threshold from $

10,000

to $

25,000

(

2 CFR 200.516).

Lowers audit burden further by reducing percentage of expenditures tested.Slide14

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

Across the Federal government, raising the threshold to $750,000 is expected to maintain Single Audit oversight over 99.7 percent of the dollars currently subject to the requirement and 87.1 percent of the entities that are currently subject to the requirement. This eliminates the requirement for about 5,000 out of the 37,500 entities currently receiving a Single Audit. The impact will vary by

state and

program. A preliminary ED analysis of prior year audits indicates a decline of more than 10 percent in Single Audits received by its pass-through-entities.

Lower value findings are reduced because of the increase in the questioned cost threshold.

Some grantees, who rely on Single Audits for monitoring,

may need to

use other audit techniques

, such as agreed-upon procedures (

2 CFR 200.506

).

Auditees should discuss with auditors their implementation of significant changes in such requirements as

subrecipient

monitoring, internal controls, and procurement.

Slide15

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

2. Provide for greater transparency of audit results by making Single Audit reports available to the public online, removing impediments to their distribution, and increasing information in audit reports. Complete reports will be available at the FAC website, with some exceptions, related to Indian Tribes

Subgrantees

are no longer required to submit their reporting package to the pass-through agency. FAC

will be the source of

subgrantees

’ reports (

2 CFR 200.512)

FAC submission process will be changed to require that audits be in text-based PDF and unlocked to improve accessibility.

More information available on audit findings and Federal expenditures.Slide16

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

The FAC responsibility for receiving and accepting audit reports will require changes in how agencies monitor submission of Single AuditsChanges in what audit findings should include, and reports should present, will increase data about compliance.

Starting with reports for FY 2015, and beyond, audit follow-up capacity at Federal

agencies

and

pass-through

entities should improve through:

Targeting audit findings of highest

risk, including whether a finding has recurred and the prior year‘s audit finding reference number

Expedited processing of lower risk audit findings

Increased opportunities for automated text analysis

Reports will be disseminated on the Internet and available to the public. Slide17

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

3. Audit follow-up will focus more on higher questioned costs, with greater attention to timely issuance of management decisions, and ensuring quality of audits resolved, and avoiding the recurrence of audit findings. 2CFR 200.513Higher threshold for reporting questioned costs means fewer, but more significant, findings resolved

Six-months clock for issuing Management Decisions starts when FAC accepts Subpart F audits; prior to Uniform Guidance it started when the agency resolving the audit received it

Federal agencies are to take part

every six

years in an

audit quality evaluation projects

.

By using Cooperative Audit Resolution practices Federal agencies are expected to significantly reduce the recurrence of audit findings among grantees. Slide18

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

ED has long used, and will continue to apply, Cooperative Audit Resolution techniques so audit findings don’t recur. This approach:

Is effective with

systemic

,

cross-cutting findings over several fiscal years

Involves a collaborative process, where participants -- including grantees, program, legal, and audit resolution staff -- share ideas and information to focus on root causes of problems and address underlying causes of findings

Often requires coordination across programs, in reaching lasting agreement on solutions, providing technical assistance, conducting site visits, and monitoring corrective actions plans Slide19

Uniform Guidance: 4 Key Changes and Their Impact

4. Strengthen Federal agencies’ use of the Single Audit process to support more efficient and effective grants management. 2 CFR 200.513

Agencies

are to develop a baseline, metrics, and targets to track effectiveness of agencies’ processes to follow up on audit findings and how they use Single Audits in awarding grants and improving accountability by grantees

.

Federal agencies must establish two new positions: (1) a

Single Audit

Accountable Official

to link the Single Audit process to improved program outcomes, including accountability by grantees, and (2) a

Key Management Single Audit

Liaison,

over operational issues, ranging from training to cooperative audit resolution.

Slide20

How ED already uses Single Audits to Improve M

onitoring and Program Outcomes

ED already uses Single Audit data to:

Assess the risk of making new and continuing grant awards, if audits are late or missing, or if serious findings are involved or are recurrent

Provide technical assistance to its grantees and impose special conditions, as necessary

Identify compliance trends and develop program-wide monitoring plans

In resolving complex findings underlying problems are addressed, which may require more time to correct than the 180 days resolution period. In issuing program determination letters on such findings, ED staff must coordinate with program offices responsible for the award and monitoring of grants, in order to

Ensure timely and consistent corrective measures, thereby improving grant outcomes

Provide audit follow-up data to assess grantee performance and make awards Slide21

When Do New Audit Requirements Go into Effect ?Slide22

Timeline

Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) applies to:

New and continuation grants awarded on

or after December 26,

2014

Audit and indirect

costs, at the start of the next

fiscal year

on or after

December 26,

2014Slide23

Timeline: Audits

Beginning of Grantee’s Fiscal Year

Uniform Guidance Audit Requirements

Apply

The First

Audit Period Subject

to 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F,

Ends

on

First Audit that is

Subject

to the 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F,

Must

be

Submitted by

January 1, 2015

January 1, 2015

December 31, 2015

September 30, 2016

July 1, 2015

July 1, 2015

June 30, 2016

March 31, 2017

October 1, 2015

October 1, 2015

September 30, 2016

June 30, 2017Slide24

ResourcesSlide25

Resources

Program Office - main point of contact

The

Department’s one-stop shop for information:

Uniform Guidance Technical Assistance for ED Grantees

Includes links to

Council on Financial Assistance Reform (COFAR)

and OMB, including

FAQs

Includes links to Uniform Guidance and EDGAR, including matrix comparing present requirements with former Parts 74 and 80

Includes the Department’s FAQs

Email questions to:

uniformgrantguidanceimplementation@ed.gov

For questions on the Uniform Guidance related to audit follow-up,

contact Charles.Laster@ed.gov.Slide26

Resources

The Department is developing additional training

on the Uniform Guidance, at

no

cost, on these topics:

Cost Principles

Internal Controls

Indirect

Cost Requirements

Procurement

Requirements

Risk and Subaward Management