PPT-Whiteboards at a former GSK site: A good argument for using

Sean Ekins Summary Oct 20 2012 Triangle Modernist Houses arranged a public tour of the former Burroughs Wellcome ElionHitchings Building in RTP NC httpbitlyQRPV0X This was last owned by GSK who exited in 2011. In Nina Paleys cartoon see Figure 1 the argument is literally a cat fight Rather than envisioning argument as something productive and useful we imagine intractable sides and use descriptors such as bad heated and violent We rarely say Great argumen Is goodness without God good enough?. A Cautionary Note. The argument is NOT that knowledge of God is required to be good.. People could breath long before scientists knew about air.. Romans 2:15 . They [Gentiles] show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them. . Senior Researcher, Futurelab www.futurelab.org.uk/events/listing/whiteboards/report Contents Introduction11. Issues, themes and gaps in existing evidence22. Key research findings43. Interactivity: cur Seminar 2: Philosophy of the Sciences. Wednesday, 14 September 2011. 1. Readings. Required reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’, Section I, Chapter 7 of Richard Feldman’s book . Epistemology. . How was your break?. New seats and teams- random draw. Quarter overview:. . The Jungle- . (excerpts) and paired nonfiction readings. Research- lab time starts next week, instruction from CGCC. . AZMerit. Argument Persu Propaganda Goal Discover t Offers good reasoning and evidence to persuade an audience to accept a “truth” Uses personal, emotional, or moral appeal to convince an audience t In Richard II. (Pages 162 and 163). The argument: . Suppose the singing birds musicians, . The grass whereon thou . tread’st. the presence strewed,. The Flowers fair ladies and thy steps no more. Kristin . Buhr. MaryLynne. Martin. Jeff Sampson. *We may inadvertently. Use IWB and SMART board. s. ynonymously.. Picture from. http://www.tech-faq.com/interactive-whiteboard.html. Interactive Poll . Seminar 2: Philosophy of the Sciences. Wednesday, 14 September 2011. 1. Readings. Required reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’, Section I, Chapter 7 of Richard Feldman’s book . Epistemology. . Seminar 1: . P. hilosophy of the Sciences. 6 September 2011. 1. What is this course about?. This course will address some of the fundamental questions in the philosophy of science.. Question 1: Can we know (or have justify beliefs) about what will happen in the future on the basis of past experiences?. effective claims and . counterclaims. . Do Now: . Make a prediction! What do you think Lyddie will do? Why do you think this?. ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. The argumentative essay . is a genre of writing that requires . Argument / Opinion Writing. W.CCR.1 . Write arguments to support claims in. . an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid. . reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.. Ethos: The Persuasiveness of Character. Ethos. The term originally meant “way of life” or “dwelling/abode” and shares the root of the words . ethics/ethical . and . ethnic.. Ethos. The term originally meant “way of life” or “dwelling/abode” and shares the root of the words . Add to your unit sketch notes from last week:. https://www.teachwriting.org/612th/2017/9/26/sketchnotes-paper-prep-thats-fun. What is Satire?. . “Don’t raise your voice, improve your argument.” Desmond Tutu.