PDF-1Metonymy and relevance 1ANNA PAPAFRAGOU______________________________

2The rhetorical treatment of metonymy faces an interesting paradox On the onehand it captures a range of phenomena which continue to be productive andwidespread in a variety of languages moreover. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project it is useful to consider the following questions To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal Exploring . Intrinsic Diversity . in . Web Search . Karthik Raman (Cornell University). Paul N. Bennett (MSR, Redmond). Kevyn. . Collins-Thompson (MSR, Redmond). Whole-Session Relevance. Typical search model : . AIM. : Is the United Nations relevant and effective?. 1. . “. On the other hand, the organization is over 60 years old and no longer. works . as effectively as it once did. Some countries have become more. Clickthroughs. for News Search. Hongning. Wang. +. , . Anlei. Dong. *. , . Lihong. Li. *. , Yi Chang. *. , . Evgeniy. . Gabrilovich. *. +. CS@UIUC . *. Yahoo! Labs. Relevance . v.s. . Freshness. vs.. Weak Induction. Homework. Study Fallacies 1-18. Review pp. 103-132. Fallacies (definition § 4.1). § 4.2 Fallacies of Relevance (1 – 8). § 4.3 Fallacies of Weak Induction (9 – 14). For Next Class: pp. 139-152. Hang Xiao. Background. Feature. a . feature. is an individual . measurable heuristic property of a phenomenon being observed. In character recognition: . horizontal and vertical . profiles, . number of internal holes, stroke . David Collings (ECU) and Bruce Guthrie (GCA. ). In this session: . Supplementing the UES. Why workplace relevance?. WRS Development. Source, versions, items. Workplace Relevance Scale. Dennis . Trewen. Resistance to Computer Training . Suzanne Stear. BTST 656 – May 8, 2013. Area of Focus. The purpose of this study is to:. Describe and identify the areas of resistance to computer training in a corporate setting. J. Max Wawrik. Nancy Rosado Colon. Law 16. Spring 2017. Law of Evidence. . . Key Terms. Adversary System (U.S.). A system of justice where the parties work in opposition to each . other, and each party tries to win a favorable result for itself. The . And. Problem solving skills. By. Ted McCain. Facilitator: Marlene Wilkinson. Teaching for Tomorrow. Goal. : To Support Problem Solving in Quadrant D. Objectives . (Secondary):. I can…. explain how Bloom’s Taxonomy has changed and why.. Paul N. Bennett, Microsoft Research. Joint with. Ece Kamar, Microsoft Research. Gabriella Kazai, Microsoft Research Cambridge. Motivation for Consensus Task. Recover actual . relevance of . a topic-document . 2018. Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 2. DIRECT vs. CIRCUMSTANTIAL: DOES IT MATTER ??. DIRECT. . EYEWITNESS TO A FACT IN ISSUE. CIRCUMSTANTIAL. EVERYTHING ELSE . Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 3. WHICH IS MORE PERSUASIVE?. E. nergy . E. fficient . N. etwork for . IPTV. Main objectives of this lecture. General. . Illustrate the usual route taken to make good computer science research. Specific. Exemplify with a resource and energy efficient network for IPTV. 1. 2. Take-. away. . today. Interactive relevance feedback:. improve initial retrieval results by telling the IR system which docs are relevant / . nonrelevant. Best known relevance feedback method: .