PPT-Presentation: Fallacies - Relevance

vs Weak Induction Homework Study Fallacies 118 Review pp 103132 Fallacies definition 41 42 Fallacies of Relevance 1 8 43 Fallacies of Weak Induction 9 14 For Next Class pp 139152. Homework. Recommended Exercises. (. do the starred problems. ). 4.4.III. : 1-50. Remember. . How does each specific argument commit a fallacy of that . type. ? . . Where precisely is the offending element in the argument?. Paul N. Bennett, Microsoft Research. Joint with. Ece Kamar, Microsoft Research. Gabriella Kazai, Microsoft Research Cambridge. Motivation for Consensus Task. Recover actual . relevance of . a topic-document . Write an OPEN, a CLOSED, and a COUNTERARGUMENT thesis for the following question.. Should states make it harder for individuals to buy guns by requiring a background check and a mental health evaluation for all gun buyers?. Exploring . Intrinsic Diversity . in . Web Search . Karthik Raman (Cornell University). Paul N. Bennett (MSR, Redmond). Kevyn. . Collins-Thompson (MSR, Redmond). Whole-Session Relevance. Typical search model : . Introduction and Activities. What is a logical fallacy?. A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true. Logical fallacies are often used to strengthen an argument, but if the reader detects them the argument can backfire, and damage the writer’s credibility . vs.. Relevance. Homework. Reading: pp. 145-152. Recommended Exercises. (. do at least the starred problems. ). 4.3.III. (of relevance & weak induction). 4.4.I . (of presumption & ambiguity). Kimberly Wyatt – Critical Reasoning. Consistency and inconsistency. Flip-flop. Waffle. Flakey. Consider new information. Change your own mind. Is it simply pandering?. Consistent Individual claims. Hang Xiao. Background. Feature. a . feature. is an individual . measurable heuristic property of a phenomenon being observed. In character recognition: . horizontal and vertical . profiles, . number of internal holes, stroke . David Collings (ECU) and Bruce Guthrie (GCA. ). In this session: . Supplementing the UES. Why workplace relevance?. WRS Development. Source, versions, items. Workplace Relevance Scale. Dennis . Trewen. J. Max Wawrik. Nancy Rosado Colon. Law 16. Spring 2017. Law of Evidence. . . Key Terms. Adversary System (U.S.). A system of justice where the parties work in opposition to each . other, and each party tries to win a favorable result for itself. The . for Pseudo–Relevance Feedback . Yuanhua . Lv. . & . ChengXiang. . Zhai. Department of Computer Science, UIUC. Presented by Bo Man . 2014/11/18. Positional Relevance Model . for Pseudo–Relevance Feedback . Don’t Be Fooled by Bad Arguments (Part 2). Classification of Fallacies. Fallacies of Relevance:. Appeal to Force. Appeal to Pity. Appeal to the People. Ad Hominem. Accident. Straw man. Missing the Point. Clickthroughs. for News Search. Hongning. Wang. . , . Anlei. Dong. *. , . Lihong. Li. *. , Yi Chang. *. , . Evgeniy. . Gabrilovich. *. . CS@UIUC . *. Yahoo! Labs. Relevance . v.s. . Freshness. 1. 2. Take-. away. . today. Interactive relevance feedback:. improve initial retrieval results by telling the IR system which docs are relevant / . nonrelevant. Best known relevance feedback method: .